davenrk Posted January 26, 2004 Share Posted January 26, 2004 What's the difference between these speakers?? in quality terms??? which between rf 25/35 is similar to the rf 3? can i put them in a small room (4x4 metres) or would they sound bad??? i must take a decision in future view.....when i will have not only a room but an house.... thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsmyforte Posted January 26, 2004 Share Posted January 26, 2004 35 is replacement for rf-3. 25 is smaller woofers. all three are great speakers and close in performance. i give the nod to rf-3 in looks, and 35 in sound quality. but its close. any of those is big for your room, but thats ok cuz i have Forte's in pretty much the same size. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenrk Posted January 26, 2004 Author Share Posted January 26, 2004 rf 3 good in what?? sorry i didn't understand you last words.....do you have a room like mine?? are they too big really?? would i listen very bad?? i live in italy......what should be the difference in price between rf 15/25/35 and rf 3? thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klipsch RF7 Posted January 27, 2004 Share Posted January 27, 2004 Get some RF-7's and call it a night Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psypathic Posted January 27, 2004 Share Posted January 27, 2004 Go with the RF-7s. Mine sound great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsmyforte Posted January 27, 2004 Share Posted January 27, 2004 i have a room similar in size to yours. what i'm saying is any of those speakers will over power the room compared to what size they are. all are great choices. i myself preferr the looks of the RF-3II versus the other two. the 25 sounds a bit harsh in the midrange, the 35 is more open than the rf-3, but the RF-3 has a more crystal clearness to it. the difference is suttle. you would enjoy any of those, the rf-35 has more bass than the 25, but the rf-3 is tighter bass than all of them. price is probably a toss up, the rf-3II is discontinued, however you may be able to find leftovers from a dealer for same price as 25's. the 35 would definitely be most expensive new or used. if i were picking, i'd take the RF-3II used as best value vs. performance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arj Posted January 28, 2004 Share Posted January 28, 2004 In pure looks the The RF-35 is better..with the magnet grills. Sadly those plastic feet are still around ! I own an RF-3 and when i recently auditioned a RF-35 could not find too much of a difference in the lower freq. (It was a Broken in Pair), although the high frequencies appeared a bit better..I could not put a finger on the exact difference. But since the Audiotion room was heavily carpeted it may be due to that.. If price is a Factor, then you will get the best deal on an RF3.. if available Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenrk Posted January 31, 2004 Author Share Posted January 31, 2004 can you tell me please the prices of rf 15/25/35 rf3 rf 3II in United States and what should cost a pair of rf 3 (non II) , 2 years old, well used i think? here in italy: rf 15 = 700 euro rf 25 = 900 euro rf 35 = 1300 euro rf 3 = 1090?? rf 3 II = 1090! rf 3 used 2 years old what should cost they for good price? less than 700 euro?? thanks a lot! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenrk Posted February 3, 2004 Author Share Posted February 3, 2004 any idea? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.