Soft to Loud: The Nature of Power and Dynamic Headroom

[minn_male42]

found this interesting article on amplifier power and required headroom.....

Why Amplifiers Often Run Out of Power Where It's Needed Most -- for Peak Dynamics

To better understand amplifier dynamic headroom, we need to look at dynamic range, and how we experience it in everyday life. On a hike in the woods, most of us know the soft rustling sound of leaves in a tree produced by a gentle breeze, a sound that measures perhaps 20 dB Sound Pressure Level (SPL) at most. And at one time or another we've experienced the sound of an orchestra or brass band in a concert hall at 100 dB SPL (or more), or of an amplified rock band at 120 dB (the latter is the maximum SPL permitted by law in a performance in a public venue). Those levels represent the extremes in dynamics that our ears can routinely register. If we were suddenly transported from that idyllic spot in the woods (20 dB SPL) to the rock concert (120 dB SPL), our ears would register a dynamic range of 100 dB.

Recall that 1 decibel (dB) represents the smallest detectable change in loudness, and that we subjectively perceive a 6-to-10-dB increase in loudness as sounding "twice as loud." What is remarkable, then, is the range in loudness that our sense of hearing can encompass without pain. In fact, our ears can accept even higher levels--a jet engine at 75 feet away measures about 140 dB SPL--before the threshold of pain is reached, but for the purposes of reproducing music or movies at home, let's confine our discussion to the dynamics of musical sounds.

To give you some perspective on music playback in the home, "quiet" music would fall in the 75-dB range, whereas "quite loud" music would measure about 85 dB SPL at your favorite spot on the couch. For purposes of illustration, let's go back to our example of listening to a recording of a solo concert-grand piano of Chopin piano works at average levels of 76 to 86 dB, using a pair of M80ti loudspeakers at a distance of 12 feet. According to our previous calculations, this would require perhaps 1 watt per channel of amplifier power, a modest demand for even the least expensive A/V receiver or small amplifier. If the pianist on the CD was playing Chopin's Grand Polonaise, however, and one of those spectacular chords in the bass octaves of the piano comes along, your amplifier and speakers will suddenly have to produce levels of 96 or 100 dB SPL without distorting, because Chopin's piano works have sudden and extreme changes in musical dynamics. Remember that a 10-dB increase in subjective loudness ("twice as loud") demands ten times as much power, or in our example, 10 watts, a level any receiver or amp will easily produce.

But if it were a real-life orchestra playing at full tilt, and you wanted to reproduce the illusion in your living room of standing next to that grand piano, then peaks of 109 dB would be required. So getting from 96 dB to 106 dB will require ten times as much power again (10 x 10) or 100 watts per channel. The goal, remember, is real-life reproduction of that grand piano, so now we only need 3 dB more (subjectively "somewhat louder") to hit 109 dB in the living room. But twice as much power is required for a 3-dB increase (100 watts x 2 = 200 watts). All of a sudden our A/V receiver or amplifier has run out of power!

Of course, it's just a brief peak, lasting perhaps 200 milliseconds (one-fifth of a second), but the amplifier must have sufficient reserves of power to properly reproduce that momentary peak without distorting. If the amplifier has 3 dB of dynamic headroom, it will make it, and output the required 200 watts per channel for a fraction of a second, with no clipping and no distortion. But the truth is that most A/V receiver amplifiers have little or no dynamic headroom, so the receiver runs out of power, the distortion rises, and audible distortion intrudes, ever-so-briefly. The piano then "sounds too loud," to our ears because of the nasty distortion components, so we turn down the volume just short of our goal, because our amp didn't have enough dynamic headroom to handle the instantaneous peak power requirement.

If your speakers are 3 dB less sensitive than the M80ti's, or you are another three feet back, then twice as much power (400 watts) again would be needed to hit that goal of 109 dB SPL. It doesn't tax our arithmetic skills to realize that aiming for rock concert peak sound levels of 115 dB (if the neighbors could stand it), is beyond our capabilities. Most of our amplifiers and receivers do not have enough dynamic headroom to deliver this kind of power output without sounding strained. (To finish the example, using M80ti's to reach 115 dB at 12 feet would require 6 dB more output, or four times the power that the 109-dB level required, so 800 watts per channel would be needed.)

How do we get that dynamic headroom into our amplifier? To answer that, we need to look at power, and how an amplifier outputs power in watts. Power in watts is the product of voltage, and current, flowing into a resistance (the loudspeaker). Voltage is the driving force, like water pressure in a hose, and it works with current, which is analogous to the rate of water flow. If the hose has greater diameter--or the speaker has less resistance to the flow of electricity, in which case it would be 4 ohms or less, rather than 8 ohms--then the amplifier voltage pushes more current through the output transistors and produces more "power." (We assume the intervening speaker cables have insignificant resistance of less than 0.3 ohms, easily achievable by using 12-gauge cables.) In many respects, it's easier to design an amplifier with big reserves of dynamic headroom to drive 4-ohm speakers, because the voice coils have fewer windings, hence less resistance to the flow of current. With 8-ohm speakers, you are wasting more potentially usable power in heat.

Nevertheless, that power has to come from someplace, and in amplifiers it's supplied by the transformer (which connects to your wall outlet) and by capacitors, which store up the reserve electrical energy from the transformer in "joules." According to Axiom electronics R&D engineer Tom Cumberland, the source of good dynamic headroom in an amplifier "comes from having a transformer with a high-flux core that measures up to 13,000 gauss--if it's any greater, the transformer will buzz--but the higher the flux in the core, the more efficient the transformer is. That will give you lots of sustained current and instantaneous current, which is then dumped into the power-supply capacitors. So the better the transformer and the better and larger the power-supply capacitors, then the better the dynamic headroom is.

"The problem with many amplifiers and A/V receivers designed for economy (the most watts for the dollar) is that they make the transformer just big enough to produce the voltage output they need , and just big enough capacitors to supply the sustained, continuous voltage and current they need for continuous power, and then the amplifiers quit, so those amplifiers have no real headroom. On top of this, the power may be calculated to be the rated output for one channel at full power and the other five at 1/8 power. So a 100-watt six-channel A/V receiver actually only has 162.5 watts of total power or 27 watts per channel with all channels driven. The better amp builders, who design for performance (reproductive accuracy for the dollar) rather than economy, will install these big transformers with huge capacitors, so then they have all these joules of energy in reserve to produce the dynamics necessary for the music."

Another important factor in dynamic headroom is that the output transistors must be very tough, and there have to be enough of them, to handle these instantaneous high-current conditions, because a great deal of heat is generated very quickly. If the transistors aren't of sufficient quality, they'll be pushed outside of the "SOA" (safe operating area) and fail. And that may happen because there isn't enough heat-sinking to keep the output devices cool under these very dynamic conditions.

One hugely important factor we've ignored so far in this discussion is whether the speakers (and the individual drivers) receiving these 200-watt or 400-watt instantaneous bursts of power from an amplifier capable of 3 dB or more of dynamic headroom can handle the peaks without significant distortion. We already know that the M80ti's are tested up to 1,200 watts of input power, but many speakers when confronted with spikes of power input may suffer something called "dynamic compression." What happens is that the sudden peak of input power pushes the driver voice coil beyond the region of magnetic flux, so the voice coil--essentially the "motor" of a loudspeaker driver--loses energy and becomes non-linear. This means it stops producing greater output levels, it can't track the incoming signal accurately, and even the driver's frequency response changes.

(Author's note: During years of participating in double-blind testing of speakers at Canada's National Research Council and publishing the results in Sound & Vision Canada magazine, which I edited, Dr. Floyd Toole introduced a special curve on our charts called a dynamic compression curve, which illustrated the change in a speaker's frequency response under very high power input levels. Unfortunately, it was not well understood by readers, so I stopped publishing the compression curve, but the phenomenon exists with all speakers at some level.)

Fortunately for Axiom, our speakers have fairly prodigious peak power-handling capabilities with little or no dynamic compression exhibited, but while the 140-dB maximum peak levels may remain elusive, it is possible using amplifiers with sufficient dynamic headroom to achieve highly realistic peak dynamics in a living room. The limitation is not in the software. As most readers know, even the two-channel 16-bit CD has a practical dynamic range of a bit less than 96 dB, and the newer formats--DVD-Audio and SACD--have spectacular dynamics. A 24-bit recording has 6 dB of dynamic range for each bit, so the potential dynamic range of these recordings is 144 dB (24 bits x 6 dB), more than enough to contain the dynamics of any known musical instruments or instrumental groups. And our home theater multichannel processors, Dolby Digital 5.1 and dts, have dynamic-range capabilities similar to the CD format. In future issues of the AudioFile we'll look at the history and use of dynamic compression in studio and live recordings, and how in some ways those practices that were so common and necessary in the era of the vinyl LP and analog tape recording have persisted and may account for losses of fidelity in modern digital recordings.

The real challenge that lies ahead is to design amplifiers and receivers capable of delivering huge instantaneous peak power output without distortion. Only then will our reproduced music and movie soundtracks not sound "too loud," and we'll sink back and revel in the thrilling dynamics that we've all experienced at one time or another with live music.

From all this, you can see the huge power requirements inherent in reproducing real-life acoustic sound levels in average or big rooms. The M80ti's are tested to levels of 1,200 watts of input power so they come very close. But the truth is that if we are seeking real-life acoustic sound levels in our listening rooms, there's a very persuasive argument for very large, powerful amplifiers. And if your speakers are less sensitive (and many are), then the power demands rise even more dramatically. Sizeable rooms and greater listening distances will also increase power demands tremendously.

Moreover, what many of us don't realize until we hear it, is that clean undistorted loud sound often does not sound that "loud." The key here is that in most of our home listening, there are small amounts of distortion caused by a lack of dynamic headroom. It's the distortion that makes it sound "loud" in a domestic setting. To remove those distortions and increase dynamic headroom relates to even more power. We've become accustomed to accepting some distortion with our reproduced music, because all amplifier's distortion ratings gradually increase as they approach their output limits or slightly clip the audio signals. When that happens, we turn down the volume because distortion starts to intrude on our listening pleasure, and it sounds "too loud."

The lesson in this is that you can never have too much power, and that big amplifiers rarely damage speakers. Little amplifiers driven into clipping burn out speakers. In the scheme of high fidelity, that last barrier to realism is having enough power and being able to approximate real-life loudness levels.

by Alan Lofft (bio), Axiom Audio (reprinted with permission)

http://forum.ecoustics.com/bbs/messages/34579/109459.html

[maxg]

Not a single mention in the article of Speaker sensitivity - remarkable! For a given set of speakers, however, what is written is not untrue.

Of course I am not at all sure this obsession with dynamic range is really all that worthwhile beyond, say, 30 dB - in terms of music at least - movie special effects may well benefit from far more.

[Spkrdctr]

Great article! I question the want to have over 105db reproduced in your living room (think hearing loss) which is the the goal he is working towards. He does a great job of presenting the future of audio (higher powered Best Buy recievers...) if Sony and others ever get off their butt and make them! I want a 200 watt per channel Sony surround reciever for $499.....I'm waiting Sony....

A general theme in many threads is the goal of louder and louder sound reproduction. The problem with this is that after just a few years of listening to very loud music (it is fun to listen too) you start having major hearing loss. At this time in my life, at a whopping 48 yrs old, I'm doing more to protect my hearing for the future enjoyment of music when I'm 60! I think everyone (especially Klipschophiles) need to protect their hearing at all times. The efficiency of Klipsch speakers allow all of us to easily damage our hearing when an 88db/watt electrostatic will not even go loud enough to cause damage. So, please be kind to your ears!

All of the above to say it was a very good article!

[Colin]

A soft rustling breeze at only 20dB is not audible by tweaking audiophiles. Axiom m80ti are line driver arrays with rated super-sensitivity of 95db (well above the 84-86dB average). So double or triple his wattage numbers! Cut them in quarters for lovers of big ole horns.

A two-channel 16-bit CD has a practical dynamic range of a bit less than 96dB. Fast musical peaks on a CD are 15-20dB above the average music level, on either A or C weighted scale; regardless of the real life range. Amps need only reproduce those higher peaks. Rise times (attack) is often much faster than 200 milliseconds. Amps need power to sustain a note lasting that long. If even supersensitive speakers need 800 watts per channel to reach the peaks, and most amps do not have that kind of power: then most amps are always clipping when reproducing brief musical peaks. This is the argument tube-ophiles make for soft-clipping: it sounds more natural.

BTW, he completely ignores where this power requirement is needed by the driver system: the low impedance and enormous energy requirements of the huge bass waves. In other words, the power needed by a speaker to reproduce the fast musical peaks is not equally distributed. The woofer needs a lot more control and push than the mid-range or the tweeter. A woofer can require 10 times more power to accurately reproduce a note than the other drivers. This is why bi-amping and sub-woofers work so well. They add power to where it is needed most.

[jacksonbart]

"Not a single mention in the article of Speaker sensitivity - remarkable! For a given set of speakers, however, what is written is not untrue."

Its mentioned not in great detail but its in there.

"If your speakers are 3 dB less sensitive than the M80ti's, or you are another three feet back, then twice as much power (400 watts) again would be needed to hit that goal of 109 dB SPL. It doesn't tax our arithmetic skills to realize that aiming for rock concert peak sound levels of 115 dB (if the neighbors could stand it), is beyond our capabilities. Most of our amplifiers and receivers do not have enough dynamic headroom to deliver this kind of power output without sounding strained. (To finish the example, using M80ti's to reach 115 dB at 12 feet would require 6 dB more output, or four times the power that the 109-dB level required, so 800 watts per channel would be needed.)"

[michael hurd]

"Fortunately for Axiom, our speakers have fairly prodigious peak power-handling capabilities with little or no dynamic compression exhibited, but while the 140-dB maximum peak levels may remain elusive, it is possible using amplifiers with sufficient dynamic headroom to achieve highly realistic peak dynamics in a living room. "

I cry B.S. , especially the part: "We already know that the M80ti's are tested up to 1,200 watts of input power, but many speakers when confronted with spikes of power input may suffer something called "dynamic compression."

The Axiom will turn into an expensive barbeque ignitor at that input wattage, for any length of time, other than a few nanoseconds.

[michael hurd]

Reference Dope From Hope, vol 22, no# 3.

[michael hurd]

See also, the Ultimate LSH. ( Loudspeaker / Space Heater ) Klipsch can also produce a speaker that can absorb and dissipate 1200w continuously. This was meant as a jab at Robert Carver.