Duke Spinner Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Absolutely ..Too Cool .... want somma them Too ...! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colterphoto1 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 now yer talkin! That would be fun to do! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke Spinner Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 'n a Blacklight , too .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-MAN Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 I have always taken the approach that a mid-horn in a vent/port is subject to excessive vibration due to low frequencies actually hitting it and reflecting and refracting off of it, which HAS to alter the output. One also has to consider what the effect on the dispersion characteristics of the higher frequencies are when source in the middle of a already flowing "river" of low frequency sound. So I always go with the mount that is best suited to avoid excessive vibration and obstructions to waveform flow (even for low frequencies waveforms which are larger than the obstruction and can "handle" it better than shorter ones). Why obstruct at all, if it can be avoided? DM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colterphoto1 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 They'd go great with my blacklight presidential campaign poster of Hunter S. Thompson! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clipped and Shorn Posted June 15, 2005 Author Share Posted June 15, 2005 Looks like I have all the information I need to set this up now. Thanks everyone. Will let you all know how it turns out. C&S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IB Slammin Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 ---------------- On 6/15/2005 2:49:50 PM D-MAN wrote: I have always taken the approach that a mid-horn in a vent/port is subject to excessive vibration due to low frequencies actually hitting it and reflecting and refracting off of it, which HAS to alter the output. One also has to consider what the effect on the dispersion characteristics of the higher frequencies are when source in the middle of a already flowing "river" of low frequency sound. So I always go with the mount that is best suited to avoid excessive vibration and obstructions to waveform flow (even for low frequencies waveforms which are larger than the obstruction and can "handle" it better than shorter ones). Why obstruct at all, if it can be avoided? DM ---------------- Put the 511b on top. If needed, elevate the driver so that the lens is "on line" to the sweet spot. Works for me. Terry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts