Jump to content

Speakerbuilding Debut


Zealot125

Recommended Posts

The ported -vs- sealed debate is one of the oldest in the book and you have people on both camps. As with everything in audio design it's a question of tradeoffs... group delay versus bass extension.

I tend to prefer ported (PR and vented) designs for compact freestanding units... as they benefit from better bass extension, higher efficiency, and better power handling above tuning.

I don't think it's too advanced... you can learn it as you go along.

Due to published T/S parameters variances... a ported design based on these can also be a little off. To correctly build it, the subwoofer could be built and the port (PR or Vent) can then be adjusted according to the measured tuning.

Rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record, PR and ported systems are essentially identical...ported usually being the better choice when port noise can be eliminated (which gets hard to do in a small box with a low tuning).

Here are some things to keep in mind when modelling different drivers:

-cone excursion: keep an eye out for the max power and cone excursion graphs to get an idea of how loud your max will be (you can change the wattage going to the driver under the signal tab).

-port noise: winisd is cool because you can mess around with the port dimensions. Plug in your previously found max wattage and then go to the "rear port air velocity" chart. You want to keep this under 20ms as anything faster gets audible. Ideally you'll want to even get below 10ms, but that's pretty much impossible with cabinets this small.

-cabinet volume: don't forget to compensate for the volume of your ports. If you enter in say a 10 cubic foot cabinet for the driver and your total port volume is 1 cubic foot, then you will need to build a cabinet with a volume of 11 cubic feet. In other words, you have to manually compensate for the port volume because winisd doesn't.

Btw, I would like to second the suggestion for the AE AV15 driver because it performs nearly identical to the MKIII, but costs less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just need to make a simply clarification of my understanding of volume. When I say I want to make and enclosure of say 100 liters, then the 100 liters is the total amout of free air space INSIDE the walls of the MDF right? The 1" walls of the MDF should not count as volume right?

However, say I add a port with a volume of 1 liter according to the above statement that the volume is just the air space inside the material. I will have to compensate for the volume of air inside the port AND the volume of the material making the port since I will have to adjust the enclosure volume accordingly, right? Am I making sense?

One other thing, are there any other structures that go into the enclosure other than the port, amp, and walls? are there bracings that I have to take into account to adjust volume?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd recommend the atlas 15(well actually, whatever replacement ascendant audio makes) from ascendant audio(although the others are good options too). i have it in a 24in cube with a 500 watt plate amp tuned to 20hz or so. i can get 115-118dB peaks in room clean at 2m away. imo its very tight and musical. a few highlights are it has an xbl motor(lowers distortion), adjustable q with the coils, and its BOTTOMLESS. this is just my two cents(and of course my biased opinion)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the volume is counted as internal not counting the walls and internal bracing.

Same goes with the port. The port does not count as internal volume.

Bracing is meant for stability of the box. Say the wall was flexing, instead of that energy going to music and bass, it is convertered to flexing. Also the stiffer the cabinet the less likely it is to color or add nodes into the sub. Meaning the flex can actually externuate certain bass regions.

Also you might want to look into stuffing the subwoofer, no not like a turkey but you can add polyfill or fiberglass or wool to actually lower the responce of the subwoofer. Polyfill being the cheapest and probably best option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive been doing some reading and found that for ported enclosures, that drivers with a Qts of less than .4 are best. So, I have come to the conclusion that if I make a ported enclsure, then I am going to use the Dayton Titanic, but if I decide to use a sealed enclosure, then I am going to use the AE AV15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...