Jump to content

6.1 virtual matrix or 6.1...which is the better deal


shimband

Recommended Posts

quote:

Originally posted by shimband:

I was looking at the Sony receiver STR-DE1075....this does not have the virtual matrix 6.1.....I'm just learning about the 6.1......which is the better way to go 6.1 or 6.1 virtual matrix?

Thanks,

Mike

If I were you, I'd start looking at the Sony STR-DB1070 as it's a better receiver than the DE series. You can get them at OneCall.com for $549 or maybe lower. Do a couple searches for it and you'll see. Check reveiws for past versions such as the DB940 or DB930.

------------------

Bob Lindabury

SPEAKERS

Fronts: Cornwalls (2)

Center: KLF-C7 (1)

Rears: RS-3's (2)

Sub: AudioSource SW-15

Rear Center: Umm...any suggestions?

AMP: Sony STR-DB1070 6.1

MISC:

Hafler DH-200 Amp;Yamaha C-50 Pre-Amp; Technics SL-1410MK2 Turntable; Sony DVP-S360 DVD

http://www.ravenimaging.com/bobl/audioequip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm thoroughly enjoying the recent upgrade i made to include vm6.1...consider room width, if it's wide, then an ACTUAL center rear would be a good choice,but adds the cost of a center rear. my ht room is 12ft.wide in the primary area,w/the rears 12ft apart, and vm6.1 does a GREAT job of simulating a center rear. avman.

------------------

1-pair klf 30's

c-7 center

ksps-6 surrounds

sony strda-777ES receiver upgraded to v.2.02 including virtual matrix 6.1

sony playstation 2

dishnetwork model 7200 dishplayer satellite receiver/digital bitstream recorder

pioneer dvd player

sharp 32"tv and sharp xv-z1u lcd projector

panamax max dbs+5 surge protector/power conditioner

monster cable interconnects/12 gua.speaker wire

a 'teens' sub coming!(RSW-15 LOOKIN'GOOD!)

KLIPSCH-So Good It Hz!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a lot of movies are available in 6.1 Dolby EX or DTS ES which are encoded with a rear channel. However many receivers including my Outlaw 1050 will extract a rear channel from 5.1 material. Dolby encodes it's rear channel using a prologic style matrix and just as with PLII additional channels can be extracted from sources recorded with less channels. I have found, however, those with the specific designation have the most dramatic rear channel effects.

------------------

Soundog's HT Systems

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...