netnut

after right ckick on My Computer then properties I don't see the rest of the path

I'm going to put together a new screamer running Win XP Pro or better and Win 98 for older games that won't run on XP.My guru and wrench turner,the one who puts all my machines together,say's that if I run more than 512 ram,my machine will see it but only utilize 512 ram beause 98 will not allow the use of more than 512.He suggests having another comfuser running 98 with an AB switch to go back and forth between the screamer and 98 box.I think the AB is doable but I don't have room for two sound systems.Switching sound systems back and forth is not an option if I have to plug cables in and out from one computer to the other.For my next screamer build I will be keeping Sony GDM-F520 CRT display and case.I will be getting nothing smaller than a 120 MB SCSI HD.I want a MOBO with no limits on memory capacity.Thinking of getting 1 or 2 gig of DDR memory, and want at least 800 mhz front side bus.Want the best sound card,probably another Sound Blaster and a new graphics card.My current cards are Sound Blaster Live Platimun 5.1 with Live Drive IR and 3D Prophet DDR-DVT, 32 MB DDR ram,256 DDR Geoforce.Thanx and all opinions are valuable to me.Let me hear your opinions on 98 and memory,can one sound system be easily used for two computers and your suggestions on new components.

Moon,with all defernce to Frzninvt,you broke me up with your wrong side of the bed line otfl

Is anyone going to upgrade their Acurus Act 3 or trade in to the Aragon Stage One? I'm trying to fiqure what to do before the deadline runs out. Thanks

If money was not an issue which preamp, amp would you get? Is Krell King.Does Mcintosh float your boat?? What colors would your Flagship fly?

Thanks DW

Thanks Trooper

Any opinions on these components? I will still be running 5 speakers.The stage one is backward compatible with 5.1 and 6.1 From what I can tell I will benefit from the the enhancements of the new equipment.Whacha think? Thanks

Any quess on how much I can get for year (1999 Acurus Act 3 (5.1) preamp and 200 x 5 amp). Thanks

If your dealer would give you $1100 for a set of RF-3's,no sub, what is the max you would spend for a set of RF-7's, without a sub?

I'm not pushing Audioquest.Go to their site and read in the FAQ section what they say about cables.Hope it helps.

---------------- On 5/9/2003 10:18:44 PM TheEAR wrote: As a HGS18 owner and RF7 fanatic I will chime in Depending how your mains are set(small or large)you may need to change the crossover point. If you run your mains in LARGE lower the crossover on the HGS by 10-20Hz. If you run your mains in SMALL mode just raise the leven on the sub or the level in the pre/pro sub setup. ---------------- Thanks EAR

---------------- On 5/9/2003 9:03:45 PM fabulousfrankie wrote: You'll definitely need to recalibrate the level of the subwoofer because the RF-7's are more efficient. ---------------- Thanks Frankie

---------------- On 5/9/2003 4:57:00 PM Danartdis wrote: Netnut, My guess is that since the RF-7 goes deeper with authority, you might want to crossover a little lower if you have the flexibility to do so. I am confident you will get many more comprehensive responses here soon. (That is quite some system) ---------------- Thanks Dan

Should I have to change my sub settings when going from the Klipsch R3 speakers to the R7'S? Thanks to all responders

---------------- On 4/11/2003 6:48:05 AM Bill H. wrote: The link in yesterdays answer from the website showed the Marked down, Retail price at $1,098.00 I think............... good luck. Get ahold of this person, he has some, may help............ Dabrowski Cool Newbie ---------------- Thanks Bill

---------------- On 4/23/2003 8:38:21 PM Darth.Balls wrote: I can't say much about the RC or the RF, but I have a pair of RS-7s and I absolutely love them. They have a pretty good range for being surrounds, and they are very efficient (as always). My only gripe is that they're huge but then again, that makes them stand out when a group of friends come over. Basically, I wouldn't trade them in for anything. ---------------- Thanks Darth

---------------- On 5/1/2003 1:04:09 PM TauRus wrote: Guys, would you suggest the optimal choice of cable (brand, gauge, type) for wiring the surround channels. Let's say the overall length would be between 25-30 feet. I am using RB5-IIs as surround channels. They are bi-wirable, but does bi-wiring make sense on surround channels (keeping in mind I have just ordered Denon DVD2900 SACD/DVD-A player)? In case it makes sense what cable would be optimal in this scenario? Something like StarQuad? ---------------- TR,Get the best wire you can afford.A better cable introduces less distortion into the system.But it does'nt improve the signal it's carrying.Yes Yes Yes to bi-wiring.It reduces distortion in the cable giving you a much better sounding system. Good luck

---------------- On 4/30/2003 10:41:07 AM TheEAR wrote: I live in Canada and in canada US products are more expensive for us then for you at home.I paid $2400 Canadian for a pair of RF7's. This is below $1600US/pair...in Canada I deal and deal,if the retailer keeps a hard line and does not want to deal I leave the store and they sell nothing. ---------------- Thans EAR

---------------- On 4/30/2003 10:33:58 AM Colin wrote: Listen, listen, listen, then spend as little as possible on the ones that really sound good. Loudspeakers are the only bargain in audio – they give the most bang for the buck. Having said that, at about $1,000 for conventional loudspeakers like the Axiom Audio M80s or $2K for the Newtronics Skates, conventional loudspeakers really start sounding good. I thought that Klipsch reference towers at about $1095 also sounded very good. If you buy used, you should be able to sell them for close to what you paid for them – making the long term investment almost risk free! Although they come with their own set of unique problems, you can also get great performance from older big old horns. Unfortunately, many of these super-sensitive older models prefer the leaded fuel of tube amplifiers rather than the modern stuff. I would match a $300 NOS rebuilt integrated tube amplifier with some $500 Heresies up against any $1K conventional loudspeaker and $1K tin SS receiver any day. It may not win in every measured category, but the old fashioned, heavily built, super-sensitive combos make music like hand-made violins. ---------------- Thanks Colin

Thanks SteelerFan

Thanks Cy

---------------- On 4/29/2003 11:23:53 PM m00n wrote: For what it's worth, I am picking up a single new RF7 for $825.00 on Thursday. So you can get them for a lot better than list. There really is a huge markup on them. ---------------- Thanks again

Thanks M00n,thats the exact # I had in mind.I had posted before but I wanted more feedback.I've been seeing numbers all over the place.Don't want to add to someones retirement fund.My dealer wnats $3350.I belive he still has movement.It's not like I hav'nt spent alot of money with him already.I quess it's what have you done for me lately.I realize you pay more at a dealer but he supports my equipment.I would like to compliment you on the way you carry yourself on these forums and your helpfulness to everyone.It is much appreciated. Thanks

How much would you spend for new speakers from a dealer? (Two) RF-7... (Two) RS-7...(One) RC-7 and think you paid a fair price.