jackson_ngo

don't make your own deduction

whats the point of listening to music in 4.1 or even 5.1 channel? surround speakers arn't ment for music listening. Is your front channel not loud enough? I find it stupid to listen to music in surround. When u are listening to a real life concert, do the sound comes from the front or do the sound comes from 360 degress?

Why not convert the entire boot to a serious entertainment center? But i'll love an M5...

mp3 are encoded in stereo formatt.

clean the connections with alcohol

we need a newer version of digital decorder...The decorder is not going to the rest of the world anyway...

klipsch should produce a new DD, it's getting outdated

check the fuse and the power source

having twice the power from the amp, that does't means it'll be twice as loud.

---------------- On 2/22/2004 3:18:18 AM Bohemian_Rhapsody wrote: the 4.1s are only slightly louder and that too in a larger room. The output per satellite on the 4.1s is also less than the 2.1s. The 4.1s dont go upto 110db, they go upto 108db as compared to 2.1s which go 106db, although the 4.1s are louder on paper but they dont give the same impression when u actually listen to them. You might find yourself cranking it up over the half way mark a lot of times while this was never needed with the 2.1s... thats just the way the 4.1s are... ---------------- I do aggree with u...personally, i find myself crank up my 4.1 most of the time. I'm using 2.1 on my system about 80% of my total usage, i sheldom use my rear speakers. Acording to paper, the 4.1 are pushing more power to their sats than the 2.1.

---------------- On 2/19/2004 12:41:00 AM 007 wrote: 4.1's are a lot louder: twice the power twice the satellites twice the subwoofer drivers you might want to check all your volume settings on your sound card (main volume, mp3 volume, wave volume) then just crank up your 4.1's, also try reposition your sub. I know i was able to add some serious gain with my 2.1's just by placing it in a corner. Try that with your 4.1 sub. ---------------- the 4.1 isn't very much louder than the 2.1 @ 110db vs 106db.

I don't live in US, can anyone tell me whats the difference in price between the SWS and klipsch's reference RW-8? If the price arn't too far apart, i think the RW-8 can also be considered

em... since thats the case, i'll strongly encourage u to get a multi-channel sound card to make full use of the surround sound. The sound blaster live is one of them u can consider given their low price.

U guys can always add a HT sub to your system, The world isn't coming to an end without the SWS

i don't see the need of a 4.1 speaker in the case

one of the sat of my system is screwed very tightly too. Did they borrowed the engine from viper to drive the screw in?....lol..

why not add a sunfire?

it's Sub Woofer System. e-mail klipsch if you don't believe

WallyWal, i don't think klipsch produced a ultra 7.1

thanks god i did not wait for the SWS

thank u guys for replying. i'm actually helping my uncle in asking about this two system as he have very limited space avaliable, therefor he can only limit his choice to this two system. I think i should know wat to get

can't blame the buyer. klipsch is the one who does't wanna produce more SWS for the market nor 230v for the rest of the world.

hi all, which is a better choice between the bose acoustimass 15 and klipsch quintet? the system will be used mainly for music. thanks

maybe the sunfire??