Ozz

Good one!

Thankyou for the replys. I think I just may go with the RS35's since I am already using them now for my side surr. I'm sure RS will sound great, better than what I have now anyways. Thanks again!

Thanks guys! Im not sure the RF35's will work for my placement issues as mains but If I were to leave the RS35's as surr. for now and go for another set of RB35's for back surr. would that work? Is that something others have done or is it usally advised to stay all RS35's or all RB35's? The RF35 idea sounds tasty but just won't fit up front. I would also have a hard time with placement issues on my side surr. as well if I went RB35's to the side. I guess I will have to stay with the RS35's on the side for now so my next best choice for back surr. would be RB35's? or RC 35?

I am ready to replace my back surround speakers (Bostons) with some more Klipsch but I need some advice. I currently have RB 35's for mains, a RC35 center, and RS35 surr. I will be replacing my back surr. but I am not sure which way to go. Should I go with all RS35's or should I put a RC35 out back or maybe two more RB35's? I watch movies mostly and my room dimensions are 13X22FT. Those poor little bostons need a rest.

Spanky, I have RS 35's for my surround speakers and I ended up placing them just about 3Ft. above my ear and just forward of my listening postion. Came up with that position partly because it was the best place to hang them for my wall set up, but honestly with them just forward of my seat the sound kinda seems to hang there in front of me while my rear speakers pull the sound towards the back of the room making the rear speakers sound more detailed to me. My 1,1/2 cents worth anyway. If ya can try move'in em around to hear the difference.

Digital Video Essentials

It's a great movie, very real period stuff. Those canons are are very cool but I thought that the guys running around above deck honestly sounded as though there was crew members on my roof. THATS A TWO THUMBS UP.!!!

Watched it over the weekend. Looked and sounded good but what a strange story line.

I guess what I meant too say was that it just all blended together better compared to the lame surrounds I was using. It sounded more balanced. Sorry, Im new here.

---------------- On 7/28/2004 4:15:50 PM edgecrusher wrote: If I keep the the RS-25s, I would have, SF-3 Floors, SC-3 Center, KSW-12 and RS-25s. The main thing I would use the everything for is movies, but I'd probably listen to music on them too. What is sonically/timbre? Things would sound wierd? I can take them back and I do still have the oppurtunity to get a pair of SS-3s for $350. If you could please reply to this as quickly as possible I would appreciate it. ---------------- I think the ss-3's are what you want due to timbre matching for those speakers. Timbre matching simply means that all of your speakers will have the same tonal qualities which will yeild a better listening enviroment. I just got the RS 35's for my RB35's. I was running some boston surrounds with my set up, but with the RS it all sounded much smoother and to me the dialog was more clear. Hope that helps some. Im sure someone will come along soon with a better explination than that so hold fast.

---------------- On 7/26/2004 12:08:25 AM pinipig523 wrote: i dont understand how people can lose respect for someone if they divorce.... thats his decision. his personal life is not in question here - he won 6.... thats all i care about. 50% of marriages end in divorce, so it aint surprising. better question, if u had a divorce, would u lose respect towards yourself? another thing, it seems that everyone is so quick to blame someone for "faults" they may have. "i lost respect for him because he divorced his wife." how about the fact that he is raising 22,000,000 for cancer research this year? does anyone ever talk about that? better yet, does anyone here do anything this great for their community? and yet, conviction and judgement is such a luxury for those of us in the sidelines. ---------------- I did'ent lose respect for Lance, I mountain bike ( in real mountains) about 400 miles a month and full well know the sacrafice it takes to gain 1% of the conditioning that lance has reached. Lance is the best cyclist on earth, no doubt about it. I believe that at this level of compition or any level of compition it's not only important to just train hard but to set the standard as well in all aspects of your life. Cycling is not ordained by God but marraige is and I would think that one who trained so hard to be a winner would have given more effort in his marriage. While its true we do not know the details of his decision I find it sad that his divorce is justified by the fact that "50% of marriages end in divorce, so it aint surprising". This attitude concerning divorce is evidence of the results of this 50% number. While it's true that Lance has helped greatly with cancer research(my mother just beat cancer)it's not true that this accomplishment somehow relieves him of his duty to his family. Like I said, I know not the circumstances surrounding his break-up but to shack up with sheryl crow(he's not married to her) so quickly say's alot about where his heart may be. I realize that this is not a perfect world and sin is a desease that afflicks us all, life can be a struggle at times, but for a guy with such God given talents and in a time when wrong seems to be right and right wrong, it's just to bad his victory's come with baggage. After all, it was Lance who put himself out there, he made a decsion in the public eye and now it's public, he left his wife or she left him, it dos'ent matter who left who, what matters is that it's finished and it appears to at least some of us that cycling, and living with sheryl crow out of wedlock takes a front seat to his marriage. I mean, it was'ent like he hooked up with crow after his divorce was put to bed. On the contrary, she was on his arm before the ink was dry so that to me sounds as though it was in the works and not somethng that befell him. Would Lance have 5 tour DE Lances victory's if he would have split after the first one with his wife? Im sure the support she gave him helped him to be the great cyclist he is. Now only to shack up with a woman. I was not judging and convicting him, I was just sad to see such a great accomplishment for an American Hero degraded somewhat by his personel choice of divorce. And yes, whatever the circumstances would be surrounding a divorce for myself, it would always be a point of sorrow and failure on my account. If I so quickly ran to a greener pasture, than more so.

---------------- On 7/25/2004 10:11:16 PM paulparrot wrote: It's not like he stabbed his ex-wife to death, like that one football player did. I do agree that Sheryl Crow is a nasty bird. ---------------- hehehehehehehe, poor ole O.J. Ya I hear what your saying though. It's just to bad for his kids and stuff the way he hooked up so quickly with crow. It just seems kinda hollywooded out to much for such a great cyclists.

---------------- On 7/25/2004 1:11:05 PM Istari wrote: Teriffic for Lance Armstrong! That is quite an accomplishment for anyone. Too bad he threw away his marriage and three kids to achieve this fleeting glory. "No outside success can compensate for failure outside the home" ---------------- I second that. I love cycling very much and followed Lance but when he dumped his wife and kids for sheryl crow I lost interest in his victory's because he failed the most important race of all.

I just got one. I like it! It go's good with the Klipsch. Real lame remote and instuctions but other than that I can't think of any reason a you would'ent be happy with it.

---------------- On 7/6/2004 2:48:57 AM white_shadow wrote: I need to buy a new camera. ---------------- That was great!!!!