Jump to content
The Klipsch Audio Community

Tizman

Regulars
  • Content Count

    329
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Tizman

  1. Chris uses 3 subs in his setup, and says that this minimizes nulls. While this may not get the job done entirely, perhaps this combined with aggressive bass trapping may be the best practical solution. Has anyone successfully applied the DBA setup? It would appear, based on Chris's quote above, that he does not use DBA in his setup. If I am reading Chris's quote correctly, he is using the equivalent of three subs along the front wall and not a DBA, and that this is sufficient for his setup.
  2. Thanks for the clarification. It would appear that the solution is room treatments or a DBA. On ChrisA’s suggestion, I read up on DBAs. My concern with them, based on my reading, is that there will be so much stuff in the room that will interfere with the operation of a DBA that it may not work properly. This is based on what I read, as I have no real world experience with them. Perhaps a DBA would work out to be the best real world solution.. It certainly appears to be the lease intrusive and most elegant solution.
  3. Thanks for the reference Chris. I'm not sure how effective I can make it given that the room will contain 60 people or so, and the furniture required to seat these people, in addition to a lot of other stuff. I may have to make do with a very large bass absorber on the back wall, even though the DBA would be an elegant and far less intrusive solution. 60 people would also make for a pretty good bass absorber. A very inconsistent one though....
  4. Yes. A proper straight 20 HZ horn is house size. If I understand this correctly, and I may not, lots of horns have output at 20 HZ, but do not control directivity at that frequency. Given my ceiling height of 10 feet/3 meters as a limitation, I can build a horn where directivity is controlled to about 57 HZ in the vertical. Horizontally, I can build a horn where directivity is controlled to around 19 HZ. Either way, there will be lots of output at 20HZ. I understand that there may be better ways to do this, and thanks ChrisA for your suggestion that I look at DBA and the SPUDS. I will do so. My goal here is to get the best sound possible in this room, and have it all be horn loaded. This project will prioritize SQ above any other criteria. There will be extensive acoustic treatments used in the room. For example, if I need to take up 10’ at the other end of the room for bass traps, it will be done. The goal is to have as large a sweet spot as possible, with the best SQ possible. All other criteria are far less important.
  5. I always thought that anything other than a full size horn was a compromise, with the various negatives associated to this compromise. My understanding is that the only reason that full size horns are not built is because they are too big for most situations, not because they are not the best way to go SQ wise. I am in the unusual situation of being able to build a full size horn. Or two if that will give a better result. I feel that this is a good thing.
  6. On the smallish side, but that’s the idea.
  7. I don’t think that this is the case. What I am trying to figure out is if having horn subwoofers that have directivity at these lower frequencies changes any requirements for the setup of my room. Specifically, will using a horn subwoofer with directivity down to 20HZ allow for a setup that uses one such horn instead of two. How will room modes be affected by using one as opposed to two? In a general sense, how does a horn subwoofer that is directional to 20HZ and whose mouth is flush with the front wall behave differently with respect to room modes as compared to a regular direct radiator sub?
  8. ChrisA and WMcD: Thank you very much for your replies. In my drawing, I show the wall at the bottom creating a room of 8' X 30'. This was for the purpose of showing a specific example. However, this room is not built yet, and I do have a clean 30' X 50' room to work with. I can put the horn entirely behind this wall, or fold the horn somewhat so it fits in the corner. Either way, I can have the mouth come out at the boundary, rather than at some point beyond the boundary, in order to avoid back wall cancellations as referred to by ChrisA.... 1 meter is roughly a half wavelength of 170 HZ. The horn mouth that I can use in this room can be as much as 3 meters high, by whatever width I choose. If I make it also 3 meters wide, the half wavelength is around 57 HZ for both width and height. 57 HZ not a subwoofer frequency, but if this system was high-passed with a steep filter at 57 HZ, what would the result be with respect to room modes? Would a single horn subwoofer placed in the middle pose more problems than one in each corner with respect to room modes? I could also I make the horn mouth 3 meters high by 5 meters wide, for example, if that helps the improve the directivity at a lower frequency. 3 meters is 57 HZ and 5 meters is 34 HZ half wavelength respectively. I can make a very big mouth for this horn. If I use a single horn in the middle of the room, as in example "B", it can be 30' wide as in example "C". 30' is roughly 9 meters, which corresponds to 19 HZ half wavelength. Attached is another drawing that takes into account the responses of Chris A and WMcD. In these drawings, assume the use of horn mouths that are a minimum of 3 meters in height and width. Example "C" uses the entire width of the room for the horn mouth, and the entire height, but could use a smaller portion of the width if that will result in a better outcome. "C" might seem crazy, but it is in fact entirely doable. Once again, your comments and insight are much appreciated.
  9. Hi All. In my research on building a pair of subwoofers for an upcoming project, I have come across conflicting opinions on the impact that the type of subwoofers used have on room modes. Basically, some have said that because horn loaded subs are directional, room modes are less of an issue than they would be in the case of omni-directional direct radiator subs. My intention was originally to build a pair of straight 30HZ horns to combine with a pair of Jubilee speakers. My plan then went to using a single 30HZ sub. This was based on opinions that two horns would be serious overkill, and that the directional nature of the bass from a 30HZ horn would minimize issues with room modes and subwoofer placement as long as the horn was pointed at the listening area. I have read some of the literature that relates to subwoofer placement in rooms, and much of it recommends two or more subs placed using various strategies, but everything I have found relates to normal subwoofers, not 20 foot long horn subs with 50 square foot mouths. So what is the deal with the directional nature of straight horn subwoofers and room modes? I have attached a rough drawing of the room and three possible setups. The drawing is rough, but in each scenario the Jubilees are placed in the same position, and the subs in the corners, or in the middle as indicated. As always, your input is much appreciated! Cheers, Tiz.
  10. Music will be very varied, with some material that includes low frequency synthesized bass (albeit not that much of it). The subwoofer will be a very large 30HZ horn loaded sub that will be as straight as possible (possibly with one fold or 90 degree turn). I am working on a design for that sub. It is very much a work in progress, but my most recent modelling is for a horn 6 Meters long with a mouth of 4.5 square meters. Thus my previous question with regard to using La Scala bins instead of Jubilees. Since the deep bass will be covered by this large horn, what am I gaining by using Jubilee bins over La Scala bins from a polars and dispersion perspective?
  11. Nice looking bins. What sort of HF driver is that on top of them?
  12. Also, just for clarity, if I use a La Scala bass bin and the K-402 (with a very large bass horn for the bottom end) crossed over at a frequency appropriate for the La Scalas (100HZ or so?), what am I losing relative to using a Jubilee bass bin crossed over at a lower frequency?
  13. For the application I have, having a huge sweet spot is crucial, as the listening position should include the whole room. Thanks for helping me hone this to something I can move forward on. I have a quality two way crossover, but will need a quality three way for this system. Any recommendations?
  14. Thanks for reminding me. I have seen you mention this in other threads. I will be using a three way electronic crossover on this project, and will be using a single, very large, 30HZ horn between the two two-ways. The crossover will include the delays needed to place the K402 where it is required, and to adjust the large bass horn's delay as well. If I do what you suggest above, will that for all intents and purposes effectively mitigate the issue with the dual mouths of the Jubilee bass bin? For the 1% of the 1%?
  15. I have followed your work on this approach with much interest. The issue that I have with it is that it requires extensive modification of the K402. It would be myself doing it and, frankly, I am worried that I will mess it up.
  16. It would seem that this is my best choice if I am going to purchase a product that doesn't require modification.
  17. I'm in Toronto, Canada. I have never seem one available used since I started looking about a year ago, at any price. If there are any members that have a pair for sale (or know of a pair) within reasonable driving distance of Toronto, please let me know. I believe they can be purchased from your local Klipsch Pro dealer.
  18. I could be convinced into MWMs. They do cost a bit less than the Jubilee bins. I'll have to consult with the boss. A couple of photos courtesy of Coytee... Are there any differences other than low end extension?
  19. By too big, it's also optics that I am referring to. It is important, in my case, that the two ways look like something that the average person might put in their home. Jubilees are very borderline. MWMs are out of the question. I will be using a huge horn for lower frequencies. Wouldn't the only difference between a Jubilee and a MWM, in my application, be the required crossover frequency to the big bass horn? Is the MWM superior in ways other than low end extension?
  20. I asked the question about extending the La Scala bass bin to see if their was anyone with experience with it, and to gain the knowledge that a discussion would generate, but I should probably let you all know what it is that I am after. I am working on a project that will use a bass bin and a K-402 as a two way in stereo with a single very large bass horn for the lower frequencies. The goal is to achieve the best possible sound quality I can in a room of roughly 30' X 50' with 10 foot ceilings. I am not looking for maximum SPL, SQ is the priority. So far, based on extensive research on this and other forums (and assuming that a MEH is not used) that has led me to a Jubilee for the two way. The remaining question is whether or not I should use a different bass bin with the K-402. My concern with the Jubilee bass bin has been addressed by ChrisA... That said, would I be better off with a Beck California bass bin? Moray James is definitely a proponent. A pair of Jubilee bass bins are triple the money of what it would cost to have a pair of Californias built. That said, SQ is more important than cost in my case. Also, MWMs are just too big for my application. The big bass horn is another thing entirely, as is it's integration with the two ways....
  21. Thanks for all the replies. I have some more interesting things to think about. I was considering the Jubilee, but had heard that the dual mouths created issues with response. These issues are avoided by the La Scala because of the joining of the two mouths, or so I read somewhere in these forums. The idea of extending the horn loaded bass by adding to an existing cabinet is very attractive, as it is far less work than building an entirely new cabinet. That said, the Beck California is something that I have been very interested in for a long time. The California appears to be a relatively straightforward build, with one mouth and a horn loaded lower frequency that is lower than a jubilee bass bin. Moray James has been suggesting it in these forums for some time.
  22. Hi All. I did a search for this but didn't find any information, so here I go. Has anyone tried to make the La Scala bass bin longer/larger by extending the existing horn mouth? My understanding is that the La Scala is effectively horn loaded to around 100HZ. If the horn were made longer by extending the mouth outward, would it be possible to lower the frequency to which the La Scala bin would be horn loaded? I'm not sure what this could look like, or should look like. Would it be enough to extend the top, bottom and sides outward? Should the extension flare out on the sides? If so, what would be the correct angle? What should you do with the front point of the doghouse? Extend it out to the new opening, or leave it as is? Your thoughts, opinions and advice on this are much appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...