RB75 vs RF35 with SVS 16-46 PC+

[casull]

Hi guys.

I'm about to get my self some new speakers...
I have heard the RF35 and I liked it J<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

And now when Im browsing the web I have found the
RB75s that also seems to be an interesting speaker.

I have not the possibility to get a demo of the RB75s

So Im relying of you guys to help me out here.

Im going to match the speakers with a SVS 16-46 PC+ so

Ill get some low end. So the big question is:

Is the RB75 a better sounding speaker than the RF35?

Does the RB75 has enough low end for music?

So guys any suggestions?

//Mike

[Speedball]

Welcome to the Klipsch Forum,

Sounds like you have a decision to make between the floor stander or the monitor. The svs will surely be plenty of boom for music and movies.

Doesn't the RB75 have the better/bigger tweeter?...........check out the specifications.

[Audio Flynn]

RB-75 when anchored to a robust stand weighing at least 20 pounds; preferably 35 will be far superior to the RF-35.

Not exactly sure of the low end performance but I would not set the sub any higher than 45 hz upper limit.

[dr-dezibel]

You're planning with a sub? - then RB75 is the way to go!!

The RF35 is not a bad speaker, in fact it's a very good spaeker in it's price range, but the 75s play definitly in a higher class. They have better compression drivers, sound more "refined", have real wood veneer and are easier to place.

[Bonzo]

I would agree with the good Dr. If using a sub, the advantages of the better compression driver out-weigh the floor standers bottom end. I have a pair of RB75's and use them in a bedroom system. Give them about 100 hrs. of break-in and they are good to go! The bass will not rattle your windows but the sub will take care of that. Good luck with your decision and Enjoy the Music!

[sdfan]

I used to have the rf3 and now have the rb75. No comparison musically,the rb75 is far superior. Not to mention the quality of the finish,mine are cherry.