Euell

Q-Man Thanks for the additional pix. Keep 'em coming - I like to show these to my friends at work when they are braggin' about the home theatre ina box that they just bought. They can't believe what you've done. I only wish there was some way to hear it in it's full glory.... Euell

---------------- On 4/7/2004 9:57:57 PM TauRus wrote: Euell, a much better option is to try it out at your home with your speakers. Listening in the store is quite a different experience compared to in-home auditioning. ---------------- Is that possible - from Circuit City? Do they have a try before you buy policy?

Hey Q Man - Can you do a series of this room - like a panorama - so we can get an idea of the entire setup? I think many of us would find this interesting as we dribble and drool.

---------------- On 4/7/2004 11:48:28 AM ekbriggs wrote: Like i stated before i have had the chance to demo them side by side (go to almost any circuit city with you own demo material and see if you can talk the salesman into hooking them up, i had no problem) on the newer polk rti, infinity alphas, and some of the smaller systems from both companies. The Hk was the clear winner in not only sound quality but overall output and its flexibility doesn't take away points either. Though i did not buy both to try them on my Rf-3s, given from what i heard from the larger and less efficient Polk Rti10 and Rti12 i think that the Hk had much more headroom, control, and ability. It just depends on whether or not your budget will allow. Good luck on the amp search. -Eric ---------------- Thanks Eric - Looks like a trip to CC is in order. Wish I could take my speakers with me!

---------------- On 4/6/2004 3:03:28 PM TauRus wrote: ---------------- On 4/6/2004 2:14:54 PM Euell wrote: You can get a Panny for 1/2 this price? ---------------- Euell, I believe the receiver Jerry was referring to is Panasonic SAXR25 which I belive had the MSRP of about $250, and currently can be bought at ebay for around $180. ---------------- Amazing - that price seems to good to be true - Do you know if they make a 7.1 model with digital amps?

---------------- On 4/5/2004 5:32:45 AM JewishAMerPrince wrote: I tried that receiver for my Master Bedroom theater and was not overly impressed, so at the suggestion of a friend, I returned it and bought the Panasonic RX 25 for about half the price. The panny's amps are much cleaner IMHO and it is also a bit smaller. My MBR theater now consists of 46" HDTV, Panasonic RX 25, Klipsch RF15 mains, RCX4 center, RsX5 surrounds and an Energy XL10" sub. This hobby becomes like a sickness and spreads! Jerry Rappaport ---------------- Jerry - Vanns is selling the unit for $499 with free shipping http://www.vanns.com/shop/servlet/item/features/538999195?v_c=Shopping Amazon also sells it for that price (through J&R Music and Computer World) - http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B00008EDC9/103-3194405-0936659?v=glance It's also free shipping outside of NY You can get a Panny for 1/2 this price?

Anyone have any experience with this reciever? Is it really equipped with digital amps?

---------------- On 4/4/2004 5:18:26 PM m00n wrote: BTW, WAF = Wife Acceptance Factor before you ask. ---------------- To some of us - the WAF carries a lot of weight!

Looks like he has sold out - damn! If anyone sees them again please email me Joel(at)Sowersnet.com. Thanks

---------------- On 4/4/2004 9:02:03 AM Q-Man wrote: Today I need to try to find a DVD video that has some low end action and see what I'm gettin out of the center with it. Do any of you know of a movie that puts some good lows in the center channel? I also will try some SACDs and DVD-Audio disc today to see if any of them have some good full range in the center. ---------------- Q-Man - it's not for long, but check out the Lord of the Rings Fellowship of the Rings. In the very beginning, during the "Death of Sauron" story, the bass is loud and very low when he "dies". Also - if you can get "The Missing" (not a bad movie unto itself) it has two trailers - Hellboy and Spiderman 2, that are socked full of bass. Kick your sub off and see how they sound through your center.

That's about the most unbelievable setup I've ever seen. Q-Man is a Klipsch God!

I have used one before - but for the life of me I cannot remember where I got it - Any of the freebies should do the trick. The one I used before allowed you to publish it on a website. I can find out tomorrow at work.

http://www.modelpress.com/dxf.htm This may do the trick - there are plenty of viewer files out there - do a google on dxf viewer - as long as you don't need to edit - just view and print.

http://www.gibsonaudio.com/flash.htm Check out the specs - and who manufactures the sound! Is this old news?

---------------- On 3/22/2004 6:04:45 PM Griffinator wrote: ---------------- On 3/22/2004 5:06:12 PM minn_male42 wrote: much better than your average cd.... IMHO ---------------- You're missing his point, and it's the same point I've been raising about the format: Sure, it's better than 16/44.1 CD, with all the associated issues with brickwall FIR filters and phase-ripple filter slopes penetrating the high frequency ranges, not to mention the dickwad dime-shop mastering houses catering to the big 5 label demands for "LOUDER, LOUDER, LOUDER!!!!" However, it is not, in any way shape form or manner superior to DVD-A, with its lossless codec compression algo and 24/96x2 + 24/48x3 surround output, which pushes those filter issues right out of the audible frequency ranges and extends the dynamic range to well below the best amplifier's noise floor. Not to mention the people mastering DVD-A are the same people who master movie soundtracks, so dynamic range is ingrained into their thought processes, as opposed to the aforementioned dime-store outfits that crush every last dB of dynamics out of the disc in an effort to ensure that it's the loudest effing thing in your multi-changer. ---------------- I have to agree with Griff - Although I am not in his league in terms of audio knowledge - all I can compare is what I hear. What I hear on good DVD-A or DTS recordings is sound that is so natural that you'd believe the performance in taking place in your listening space. The SACD's, however, don't seem to provide that full "live" sound - they merely sound to me like someone seperated the channels and the sound is very localized, not "full" range. Granted - as stated before, there seems to be a lot more emphasis on the mixing and mastering of these recordings, and that makes them superior to standard CD's, but I don't think they hold a candle to the DVD-A format. I also like the fact that most of us already have the means to play these discs without having to buy another piece of hardware.