Jump to content

babadono

Heritage Members
  • Posts

    10190
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by babadono

  1. 57 minutes ago, rplace said:

     

    Maybe I'm mixing things up that I've read. Is it a true statement that on the EQ side of things (which I'm not messing with yet) when trying to flatten the curve it is better to bring peaks down then dips up?

     

    Since I can't just hit Chris up for a Jube export to import on my end, what should my next steps be? If not painfully obvious yet, I pretty much have no idea what I'm doing with an active crossover. Lots to learn and fun so far.

    Files will have an extension .XDAT. Store them on your computer in a new directory of your choice. I call mine "Xilica Files" Imagine that:). Do you have the XConsole App. up and running? And are you connected to the crossover? I am assuming you are. If so you will be able to open the .XDAT file and download to the crossover. Then store it in the crossover so you don't have hook up your computer all the time.

  2. You have a digital active crossover now. I don't see why there is any limitation on boosting as opposed to only using cutting in the filters. Of course you can't go crazy and overload the unit.

     I don't know if you saw my post in my Jube thread but I figured out what the front panel meters are indicating. There are showing level in dB below 0dBFS. And 0dBFS to Xilica is +20dBu. So as long as none of the red LEDs on the front panel meters are illuminating you are not overloading the Xilica. The meters in the XConsole App. are showing levels calibrated in dBu and are therefore much more useful in MHO.

     

  3. 45 minutes ago, rplace said:

     

    Zero idea on PEQ, GEQ, ETC. Also I did all my filters and attenuation on the output side, is that reasonable? 

    Now you're getting into where I need to go also. This is more @Chris A 's bailiwick. I would not want to even pretend I know anything about this yet except following someone else's instructions.

    • Thanks 1
  4. 30 minutes ago, rplace said:

     

    From what I gather you need to know something about the balanced output device. One of the reasons I bought the Xilica was because I figured somebody here must have used it with unbalanced gear. Here is a quote from the last site I linked to

     

     

    But it does not elaborate on how to know or what to do. Do you connect your Xilica to an unbalanced amp? If so is it the same connection you originally outlined with 2 wires + shield? If not what?

     

    Thanks for all the help so far!

    Yes I posted in another of your threads about this, that I have knowledge about the internal workings/topology of Xilica's output circuits. I know that Xilica's output circuit is only a balanced impedance, there is no active signal on the minus output only signal ground through an impedance that matches it to the plus output impedance. Therefore we can connect it directly to the ground of the unbalanced equipment at the RCA connector.

    Thus far I have only used my Xilica with balanced inputs. But have No Fear, it will work.

  5. 20 minutes ago, rplace said:

    Starting to see the light @babadono Yesterday I did not have the vocabulary you did and was confused about "Shield". To me they are all wires. This does a pretty good job of explaining that when you are going form unbalanced output to balanced input both ways in the picture posted will work but the one with the shield and 2 wires is better.

    https://www.presonus.com/learn/technical-articles/Balanced-Unbalanced

     

    I'm going to order some RCA ends that I can solder up and just cut both ends off some of my XLR cables I ordered to have the 2-wire + shield on my input side for the long term. Still might give it a go with my simple dual ended RCA cables with one clipped off and a jumper at the Xilica side.

     

    As for the Balanced to Unbalanced as I move from the Xilica to amps I'm still trying to figure that one out.

    A lot of Presonus's diagrams are direct copies from Mr Whitlock(see AES seminar linked above). What confusion are you still having about connecting the Xilica outs to the amps RCA inputs?

  6. 2 hours ago, CECAA850 said:

    If you look closely at the diagrams you provided, both methods are doing exactly the same thing.  You're running wire 1 and wire 3 parallel.  The only difference is where they're joined together.

    Exactly the same thing? Well not exactly. They are NOT the same. An ohm meter will tell you they are the same, but they are not. You must think in terms of where the currents will flow.

  7.  

    2 hours ago, rplace said:

     

    After a bit of digging and a lot of reading it seems to me there are two way to accomplish this. However, I'd like some confirmation. If I'm right and you have a cable with 3 wires then you connect it as @babadono suggests with the 3 wires at the XLR end connected exactly as you would expect and at the RCA end you put the negative and ground both to the "Shield" or non-positive part of the RCA tip. If you have a 2 wire cable like cutting the end of a standard RCA you put a short wire or jumper between the ground and negative at the XLR end. I've not come upon anything that suggests one is better or correct. Should note that this seems to be for when you are going from unbalanced equipment to balanced equipment like in my case of a consumer preamp to the Xilica. I'm seeing different approaches for going the other direction as in a balanced device to a non balanced device such as would be the case when going from the Xilica to a consumer amp.

     

    Thoughts?

     

    RCAtoXLR.JPG.3b21471841127942894f71bf0eefaa8d.JPG

    You must think in terms of where the chassis currents and signal currents will flow. These two arrangements are NOT the same. The diagram does not explicitly show that the black wire is a shield. In the 3 conductor cable the chassis current on pin 1 of the XLR will flow on a separate conductor(the shield) all the way down the cable until it gets to the RCA connector where it will tie to the chassis of the unbalanced equipment. The signal ground current on pin 3 of the XLR will flow through the blue wire of the twisted pair until it gets to the RCA connector where it connects to the same point as the shield, because in unbalanced equipment the signal ground and chassis ground are the same point. In the 2 conductor cable with pins 1 and 3 of the XLR jumpered together the chassis and signal ground currents flow in the same conductor(most likely a shield). This can cause Common Impedance Coupling(CIC). The 2 conductor arrangement is used all the time but is not optimal. Someone may use it satisfactorily for years and then they add a component to their system or just move their system and start having problems because the chassis ground current couples a signal onto the signal ground and the unbalanced equipment has no mechanism to discriminate between wanted and unwanted signals.

    • Thanks 1
  8. 2 hours ago, CECAA850 said:

    I'm sure my wife would like this part:

     

    "The wife, on her part, ought not to be less desirous than she was in the days of courtship".

     

     

    I'll be in the garage.............................

    Be nice. We know your wife. And we like her.:)

    • Like 3
    • Haha 1
  9. 1 hour ago, rplace said:

     

    So I've reread your post a few times and googled twisted pair with shield. Are you saying to get a wire like below and make the phoenix end like normal +/-/G and at the RCA end solder up the + to + and the - and Ground to the "other" part of the RCA? I must admit I've never made my own RCA or soldered one. Guessing there are two places for wires to attach on an RCA and it will be obvious which is which with some searching.

     

    So normal Phoenix end with home made RCA connection?

     

    B5500FE.jpg

    Yes. Or order some of these in the length needed. Lop off (or un solder)the XLR end. Use the resulting bare wires into the phoenix connectors:

    https://www.monoprice.com/product?c_id=115&cp_id=11509&cs_id=1150902&p_id=4777&seq=1&format=2

    You will see from their wiring diagram the proper way to wire RCA connector to a balanced cable

  10. The output of the Xilica is balanced impedance but there is NO SIGNAL on the minus output. It is just ground through an impedance that is equal to the plus output. Does your cable have 2 conductors or 3? The best way to wire this type of output to an unbalanced input (RCA) is using a 3 conductor cable (a twisted pair with a shield). The minus conductor of the twisted pair would then be connected at to the shield AT THE RCA connector along with the shield. This allows the inter chassis current to flow through the shield and not the signal conductor.

  11. 17 minutes ago, CECAA850 said:

    I'll be insulating the door panel also.  There's one window in the garage and it will get a double pane argon filled replacement.

    AC and argon insulated windows in a garage? This man spends some serious time in his garage:)

    Come to think of it I am contemplating moving the pellet stove I just removed from the corner in the basement where one of my Jubes resides to my garage.

  12. 34 minutes ago, rplace said:

     

    Cheated on mine. Insulated garage doors, insulated ceiling and walls. The front where the doors are has a people door in addition to the two large garage doors so probably less than 10' feet total of 33' that are not doors. I've just got brick on the outside and 2X4s inside, no insulation/OSB.....oh, crap now that I think about it OSB is that funky looking chip board right? I'm sorry not OSB in the inside walls I think it is call T1-11. Sort of a paneling look with a tongue and groove overlap. Much cleaner/neater looking than OSB. Comes prefinished, no need to paint and very durable. I'll see if I can dig up a picture of my actual garage. I'm very happy with the T1-11, not OSB inside.

     

    Give this some consideration as the finished wall inside covering up the insulation.

     

    paint-t1-11-siding-panels.jpg?sfvrsn=0

     

    EDIT: Here is a picture from very early after construction. The back wall looks white but that is the pegboard. Right wall is the T1-11. Still looks like the picture many years later. Could not be happier with the outcome. Heater and Heresy II visible in the back.

     

    GarageFinished003.jpg

    Mmmmmm....Beer

    • Like 2
  13. 1 hour ago, muchilus said:
    1 hour ago, tigerwoodKhorns said:

    Are you using mini split HVAC systems for your entire house? 

     

    If so, how well do they work? 

     

    I do use  berinher 3 way active crossover. Xlr.

    I think something got lost in translation:)

×
×
  • Create New...