Jump to content

Subwoofers

Scratch that "low-end itch" with talk about subwoofers of all types.
Hz so good.

718 topics in this forum

    • 21 replies
    • 2075 views
  1. Need info

    • 38 replies
    • 361 views
  2. La Scalla speakers

    • 15 replies
    • 129 views
    • 40 replies
    • 905 views
  3. Othorn...

    • 11 replies
    • 239 views
    • 11 replies
    • 145 views
    • 17 replies
    • 403 views
    • 13 replies
    • 536 views
    • 4 replies
    • 84 views
    • 13 replies
    • 232 views
    • 0 replies
    • 53 views
    • 3 replies
    • 59 views
    • 8 replies
    • 276 views
    • 6 replies
    • 612 views
  4. Best DIY subwoofer?

    • 71 replies
    • 1489 views
    • 1 reply
    • 94 views
    • 9 replies
    • 479 views
    • 2 replies
    • 123 views
    • 5 replies
    • 391 views
    • 1 reply
    • 118 views
  5. Sub for Jubilee's

    • 46 replies
    • 1287 views
  6. R115SW *2

    • 3 replies
    • 203 views
  7. Loving this sub

    • 43 replies
    • 1277 views
    • 3 replies
    • 136 views
    • 11 replies
    • 403 views
  • Recent Posts

    •   Holy chit Professor! Very deep-mathematically speaking. And I would hate for you to be on my jury. On the other hand you would probably have the Judge baffled. 
    • Great; thanks ... how about $75  
    • I am hoping for Forte or Chorus I have the CIIIs .....Forte and Chorus were my cherry breakers
    • Hi All,   Been searching and searching ... many posts, but not much for a "newcomer" to tube amps     Tried a (cheap) 23W/ch Pilot 230 tube amp in my small "stereo test room," and wasn't impressed. Although the sound was "different," I preferred my Marantz 1060 hooked up to Forte's and KG4's there.     Went through pages and pages in the "garage sale" section, but so far no luck.   Also ... sorry, but am too cheap to get a Mac 275 (locally at $6000) just to "try it."  Looking for a good tube amp for $500-$1000. Any comments are appreciated.     Cheers, Emile
    • Sorry, can't rip a brotha off, that would be 2x price                 nope, I wish
    • I am running a 5.1 system and have no real desire for Atmos and buying more speakers, etc.   I have no idea which version of Audyssey I'm running.  All I can see is Audyssey MultEQ dynamic volume.  I would say my room is very well dampened with thick wall to wall carpet and a few couches.  Nothing on walls to cut down or absorb any harshness.  Not so sure the Audyssey is working correctly.  This was the first time I calibrated the system and got a low subwoofer level where I had to crank it up 5db.  I calibrated twice with same results.  When I had the Def Tech subwoofer I had to back it down.  Doesn't make sense to me.
    • If you write it as -s+s, then yes.  But it could equally be interpreted as -s-s, which would equal -2s.  Of course we would have to define reverse sarcasm, which on its face would be defined as no sarcasm.  So, the jury is still out on this.  
    • I hope their a least cornwalls... send us the picks of the speakers !
    • I hear you, I have heard some positive remarks about combining SS and tubes though. As the SS would only be for the woofer I'm thinking it could work quite well with the tubes. At the moment I'm gonna be feeding the 6 channels with a Marantz AV/receiver. Reason for going active is because it looked cheaper than the passive (+I have a different horn than the K-401, so I need a different cutoff). A plan I might try out is using a decent SS (maybe something like a second hand Emotiva xpa-3) and a 6 channel tube Amp like the Musical Angel Meng X5 and use that combo to power both the fronts and center
    • I've got a pair in really good condition, with Klipsch labels, black from my 83 corns.   michigan  
×