Jump to content

WDTS


hazebrewer

Recommended Posts

Taken from AVS Form on this exact question:

if calibrated properly, the RB-61 should be the exact same loudness as the RS-52.



The key difference between these two speakers is their off-axis sound
dispersion. The RS-52 is a bipole design, (two sets of drivers firing
in phase with each other). They also have Klipsch's WDST, (Wide
Dispersion Surround Technology.) They radiate a 180 degree dispersion
pattern that sends equal volumes of all frequencies throughout the room.



This is different than a dipole. A dipole looks the same as a bipole,
but the drivers fire out-of-phase, which creates a "null" in the
forward axis of the speaker. All the sound energy from a dipole is
directed to the front and rear of the room, (assuming they are properly
mounted at the listeners sides), and nothing is directed forward.
Dipoles sound very "diffuse" and non-directional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wide Dispersion Sound Technology

just as it sounds, Wide sound if you use direct radiating speakers as surrounds if you sit of axis you will know that the sound is either ahead of you or behind you. WDSTis to disperse sound in 180 degrees to help eliminate being stuck in one location for listening purposes. As a previous poster said at a cinema there are 6 speakers or so on each wall that are direct radiating speakers so we are trying to simulate the effect of having sound all around us. I don't have 22 speakers in my listening room ....but some may.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Klipsch Employees

W.D.S.T.

1) Klipsch Wide Dispersion Surround Technology surround speakers take a different approach to surround coverage than dipole and bipole surrounds. a) Dipole models place drivers out of polarity to create a null on one axis of the speaker. It is popular to sit in the null, thus the loudest sounds come from indirect radiation from the speaker. A dipole, used in this manner creates a diffuse and non-localized rear sound field.i) Some drawbacks to dipole surrounds include that the rear sound field is not confined to the rear. As much radiation is radiated forward as rearward. ii) A dipole also depends on other surfaces in the room to reflect the sound to the listener. iii) A dipole can only create a diffuse rear sound field.

iv) Finally, a dipole is very inefficient at low frequencies, as the out of phase bass cancels.

B) Bipole models place drivers on several faces, with the idea that the radiation is equal in all directions, like a point source. i) The problem is that the drivers interact, and actually radiate sound very erratically, with a different frequency response in each direction.

ii) The sound field created is not coherent and as a result is not very realistic.

c) Klipsch WDST surrounds are very much like a professional concert array. The high frequencies, made directional by the horn, are arrayed at the proper angles to provide even coverage, or with the same frequency response in all directions. The single woofer is crossed over where it is omni directional, thus creating a system which truly radiates sound equally in all directions.

i) WDST models provide balanced direct and reverberant sound field to listeners. Since the response is the same in all directions, the reverberant sound filed reaching the listeners from other directions, is balanced spectrally with the direct sound, creating a coherent, realistic rear sound field.

Hows that for an answer?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...