Jump to content

Another ported Heresy question...


Recommended Posts

Hello All,

New to the forum, but not audio. I've recently procured some 1979 Heresy's from the original owner. I've been itching to build something lately and I don't want to cut or hack on the Heresy's.

Reading through the posts about ported Heresy's, I found an MCM woofer that appears to have the correct specs to work well in 2 cubic foot ported enclosure (http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/MCM-AUDIO-SELECT-55-2952-/55-2952).

Anybody tried this or have any comments?

I figure you could make a new back panel with a port and easily convert from sealed to vented without compromising the original speaker too much, plus you could easily "restore" it for resale value if you wanted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well plugging in the "advertised" specs yields an F3 of 50Hz, tuned to 45Hz in a 2 cubic foot box, which is roughly the volume of a Heresy. If the average original Heresy has a roll off of 60~65Hz, then extending that down to 50Hz (for $25) might be worth something.

In addition, room gain will net you a few extra dB of bottom end, depending on your speaker placement. When I get my woofer samples, I'll run them on the Klippel and confirm the T/S parameters.

Of course there is nothing like building sample enclosures and hearing the results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm using them in 2.5 cu ft tuned to 50hz (actually a pair in 5 cu ft), and they're not bad.

The Heresy I and II are about 1.85 ft^3 gross (21.375"x15.5"x13.25" with a setback of .25 for grill, 3/4" construction), and with the rear-mounting of the original woofer driver, network, and horns I figure about 1.6 ft^3 net.

If you do build a 2 ft^3 (net) box and tune it to 50hz, it will be about 3dB down at 50hz according to BBPro v6.0

Name: 55-2952
Type: Standard one-way driver
Company: MCM
No. of Drivers = 1
Fs = 38 Hz
Qms = 2.8
Vas = 108 liters
Cms = 0.271 mm/N
Mms = 64.8 g
Rms = 5.525 kg/s
Xmax = 4 mm
Xmech = 6 mm
P-Dia = 259.8 mm
Sd = 530 sq.cm
P-Vd = 0.212 liters
Qes = 0.385
Re = 7.2 ohms
Le = 1 mH
Z = 8 ohms
BL = 17.01 Tm
Pe = 100 watts
Qts = 0.338
no = 1.484 %
1-W SPL = 93.86 dB
2.83-V SPL = 94.32 dB
-----------------------------------------
Box Properties
Name:
Type: Vented Box
Shape: Prism, square
Vb = 2 cu.ft
Fb = 50 Hz
QL = 7
F3 = 49.93 Hz
Fill = minimal
No. of Vents = 1
Vent shape = round
Vent ends = one flush
Dv = 4.091 in
Lv = 3.278 in
****************************************

In 1.6 ft^3 tuned to 42hz (4" dia x 9" long, a 4" 90° elbow is about right) they're about 7dB down, with 'room gain' it might sound reasonable, and the group delay looks much better on this design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So our data (and thinking) yield similar results. My plan is to build some Heresy "clones" for home theater. I wanted the main speakers to go down to at least 50Hz so my sub could take over from there. I prefer the sound of paper cones, even for bass. And the treated cloth accordion surrounds seem to last forever.

I have the space for larger enclosures, but try and balance performance vs size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm using them in 2.5 cu ft tuned to 50hz (actually a pair in 5 cu ft), and they're not bad.

The Heresy I and II are about 1.85 ft^3 gross (21.375"x15.5"x13.25" with a setback of .25 for grill, 3/4" construction), and with the rear-mounting of the original woofer driver, network, and horns I figure about 1.6 ft^3 net.

If you do build a 2 ft^3 (net) box and tune it to 50hz, it will be about 3dB down at 50hz according to BBPro v6.0

Name: 55-2952
Type: Standard one-way driver
Company: MCM
No. of Drivers = 1
Fs = 38 Hz
Qms = 2.8
Vas = 108 liters
Cms = 0.271 mm/N
Mms = 64.8 g
Rms = 5.525 kg/s
Xmax = 4 mm
Xmech = 6 mm
P-Dia = 259.8 mm
Sd = 530 sq.cm
P-Vd = 0.212 liters
Qes = 0.385
Re = 7.2 ohms
Le = 1 mH
Z = 8 ohms
BL = 17.01 Tm
Pe = 100 watts
Qts = 0.338
no = 1.484 %
1-W SPL = 93.86 dB
2.83-V SPL = 94.32 dB
-----------------------------------------
Box Properties
Name:
Type: Vented Box
Shape: Prism, square
Vb = 2 cu.ft
Fb = 50 Hz
QL = 7
F3 = 49.93 Hz
Fill = minimal
No. of Vents = 1
Vent shape = round
Vent ends = one flush
Dv = 4.091 in
Lv = 3.278 in
****************************************

In 1.6 ft^3 tuned to 42hz (4" dia x 9" long, a 4" 90° elbow is about right) they're about 7dB down, with 'room gain' it might sound reasonable, and the group delay looks much better on this design.

MCM 55-2952 Real T/S Parameters measured via Klippel

Electrical Parameters #1
Re 8.26 Ohm electrical voice coil resistance at DC
Le 0.623 mH frequency independent part of voice coil inductance
L2 0.860 mH para-inductance of voice coil
R2 9.38 Ohm electrical resistance due to eddy current losses
Cmes 981.24 µF electrical capacitance representing moving mass
Lces 15.24 mH electrical inductance representing driver compliance
Res 18.62 Ohm resistance due to mechanical losses
fs 41.2 Hz driver resonance frequency

Mechanical Parameters
(using laser)
Mms 58.935 g mechanical mass of driver diaphragm assembly including air load and voice coil
Mmd (Sd) 51.689 g mechanical mass of voice coil and diaphragm without air load
Rms 3.225 kg/s mechanical resistance of total-driver losses
Cms 0.254 mm/N mechanical compliance of driver suspension
Kms 3.94 N/mm mechanical stiffness of driver suspension
Bl 7.75 N/A force factor (Bl product)
Lambda s 0.059 suspension creep factor

Loss factors
Qtp 1.453 total Q-factor considering all losses
Qms 4.726 mechanical Q-factor of driver in free air considering Rms only
Qes 2.097 electrical Q-factor of driver in free air considering Re only
Qts 1.452 total Q-factor considering Re and Rms only

Vas 107.6013 l equivalent air volume of suspension
n0 0.344 % reference efficiency (2 pi-radiation using Re)
Lm 87.56 dB characteristic sound pressure level (SPL at 1m for 1W @ Re)
Lnom Zn missing dB nominal sensitivity (SPL at 1m for 1W @ Zn)

rmse Z 2.30 % root-mean-square fitting error of driver impedance Z(f)
rmse Hx 1.75 % root-mean-square fitting error of transfer function Hx (f)

Series resistor 0.00 Ohm resistance of series resistor
Sd 547.39 cm² diaphragm area



Electrical Parameters #2
Re 8.14 Ohm electrical voice coil resistance at DC
Le 0.592 mH frequency independent part of voice coil inductance
L2 0.966 mH para-inductance of voice coil
R2 10.07 Ohm electrical resistance due to eddy current losses
Cmes 701.90 µF electrical capacitance representing moving mass
Lces 19.51 mH electrical inductance representing driver compliance
Res 24.45 Ohm resistance due to mechanical losses
fs 43.0 Hz driver resonance frequency

Mechanical Parameters
(using laser)
Mms 58.453 g mechanical mass of driver diaphragm assembly including air load and voice coil
Mmd (Sd) 51.207 g mechanical mass of voice coil and diaphragm without air load
Rms 3.407 kg/s mechanical resistance of total-driver losses
Cms 0.234 mm/N mechanical compliance of driver suspension
Kms 4.27 N/mm mechanical stiffness of driver suspension
Bl 9.13 N/A force factor (Bl product)
Lambda s 0.045 suspension creep factor

Loss factors
Qtp 1.159 total Q-factor considering all losses
Qms 4.637 mechanical Q-factor of driver in free air considering Rms only
Qes 1.543 electrical Q-factor of driver in free air considering Re only
Qts 1.158 total Q-factor considering Re and Rms only

Vas 99.3444 l equivalent air volume of suspension
n0 0.492 % reference efficiency (2 pi-radiation using Re)
Lm 89.12 dB characteristic sound pressure level (SPL at 1m for 1W @ Re)
Lnom 89.05 dB nominal sensitivity (SPL at 1m for 1W @ Zn)

rmse Z 2.09 % root-mean-square fitting error of driver impedance Z(f)
rmse Hx 1.89 % root-mean-square fitting error of transfer function Hx (f)

Series resistor 0.00 Ohm resistance of series resistor
Sd 547.39 cm² diaphragm area

In addition, the voice coil assembly appears to be out of the magnetic gap. Like they used the wrong "jig" when assembling the woofer. This may account for the low BL product since the VC is barely in the magnetic gap. If the manufacturing quality was better, this woofer might perform quite well in small(er) enclosure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I tried the MCM woofers listed earlier in this post ans was not happy with the results. I recently came across a woofer that appears to be a great candidate for a "Ported" Heresy project, the Celestion TF1225. They are only $56.99 from J&R Music World.

http://celestion.com/product/102/tf1225/

I am currently testing a 3.5 cubic ft ported enclosure with TF1225 woofer, K55V mid / 700 horn and K77 Alnico tweeter. I am also using a Heresy Type E crossover slightly modified for said driver combination.

I'll post frequency response graph, impedance graph and cross over schematics soon.

So far it sounds great, just like a Heresy, but with more Bass. Preliminary testing shows the response down to about 45Hz (F3) in this enclosure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...