Jump to content

K-700 Horn question PHOTOS and Weights added to reply post


jimjimbo

Recommended Posts

It appears to me that there are two iterations of the K-700 horn.  The "first generation" which has a rougher finish and looks thicker in construction.  Then there is the next generation which has a much smoother look, seems to be thinner in construction, but which is noticeably heavier in weight.

 

It seems that the "second generation" heavier horn would be more desirable, yet I've seen numerous listings on the bay and elsewhere stating that the thicker "first generation" is the better and more expensive of the two, even though it's quite a bit lighter in weight and apparent density.....Am I reading this right?  Is there a noticeable difference in performance between the two?

Edited by jimjimbo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Photos and weights.  Horn on the right in each photo is what I understand to be the "First generation" K-700 horn.  Much thicker construction, but much less dense, and weighs an entire 16 oz. less than the other.  So, my question remains, why is the thicker horn (supposedly) more desirable?

 

 

post-12530-0-33340000-1420407565_thumb.j

 

post-12530-0-83620000-1420407553_thumb.j

 

post-12530-0-06580000-1420407586_thumb.j

 

post-12530-0-10860000-1420407608_thumb.j

 

post-12530-0-29980000-1420407625_thumb.j

 

post-12530-0-58300000-1420407643_thumb.j

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...