Jump to content

I couldn't resist


3dzapper

Recommended Posts

Although I already have a 299c I just could not pass this one up:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3046500612&category=39783&rd=1

There was a $199.95 buy it now. My wife is going to take my computer away! She keeps threatening. I will have a 299c for sale soon. I'll offer it here first send it to NOS Valves and you will be set for life(or that is what you can tell the mrs.) I juiced!

Rick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, I don't think that is a 299-C, maybe you could check wih NOSValves but the tube layout and composition do not correspond with a 299-C. THe 299-C used either a 6Ub or a 7199 split load phase inverter.... I don't see these listed on the tube complement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greg, Did that one hit the reserve? It was nice but I cringe at foreign transactions.

bkrop, I noticed the tube list and attributed it to a typo. The layout is the same as my other 299c and they are 1602 no's apart. Just the case and vintage tubes were worth the price I think.

Rick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you have a 299C with the tubes lined up along the back like that ?? This is strange ! Maybe Ryan will know what the deal is. I have done many 299C and LK72's and they all have the tubes lined up in front of the transformers . The only amps I have seen with that layout are the 299D, LK72B, 233 , 222D and LK48B. The versions from Scott never end evidently !

Craig

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Craig,

According to the HH Scott web, some 299c's use 233 circuitry with a couple of bells and whistles added. I think that these were the late production models. They use the 6U8 splitters instead of 7199s and have smaller output transformers than the earlier ones. They sound great though. I can only imagine what one might sound like with your mods.

Rick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, I didn't even notice that the reserve was not met on that one. I did a search and found that this is the second time in two weeks that it was listed and the reserve was not met. I wonder what Craig would have to say about the parts used in the "restoration" and the value of this piece.

Here's the link

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3044736814&category=3284

Greg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...