johnny_tv Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 http://www.klipsch.com/product/product.aspx?cid=178 There are KG 5.2 and KG 5.5 and other .2 and .5 speakers. What's the difference between the .2 and .5 suffix on the speakers? One is a lighter wood, is that it? Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colterphoto1 Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 .2 is single woofer and larger Passive Radiator .5 is double woofer, no PR, and ports I have no experience with either but the KG4 and every other PR Klipsch speaker I've heard has amazing smooth low end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.4knee Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 My Brother has a set of KG 5.2's. They are a very nice speaker. IMO a little thin on the high end but as Michael stated very smooth on the low end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkBK Posted December 13, 2005 Share Posted December 13, 2005 Uuuuugh .......... .3? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theryugobuddy Posted December 13, 2005 Share Posted December 13, 2005 I got my KG5.2 crossovers re-done by DeanG--it makes all the difference-- High end is richer to go with that smooth low end Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny_tv Posted December 13, 2005 Author Share Posted December 13, 2005 Can the KG 5.2 speakers be used as the front left and right (mains, is that the correct term?) until a 5.5 set can be attained? I mean I know I could hook them up, but would the sound still be okay with the KV3 as the Center Channel and the 5.2 speakers on the side? Thanks again all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t-man Posted December 13, 2005 Share Posted December 13, 2005 That would work fine. IF you have 5.2s there would be no point in replacing them with 5.5s. They will both sound equally as well with the KV3. I'm not sure why you insist on basing everything on your center channel. You may want to rethink this. Start with mains that you want and then find center/rears. The KV3 should mate well with just about any KG line speaker, and there are many to choose from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny_tv Posted December 13, 2005 Author Share Posted December 13, 2005 That would work fine. IF you have 5.2s there would be no point in replacing them with 5.5s. They will both sound equally as well with the KV3. I'm not sure why you insist on basing everything on your center channel. You may want to rethink this. Start with mains that you want and then find center/rears. The KV3 should mate well with just about any KG line speaker, and there are many to choose from. A while back I found the KV3 on a return. I paid $200. It is the only nice speaker that I have ever had. I thought it would be better if I kept what I had and tried to rebuild what it should have been. It doesn't have to be the KV3, but if it isn't I don't know what to get. It's just what I own. I could sell it and start over, but that is another thread... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earle Decker Posted December 15, 2005 Share Posted December 15, 2005 I use 5.2's as my mains and surrounds. Sounds great. Earle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.