billyjoe72 Posted January 31, 2006 Share Posted January 31, 2006 First off howdy. I usually hang out in HT, 2 channel, general and modifications. I mostly look and use info I see. I'm not rich. That being said I am always building or tinkering with wood. A while back some friends and myself were watching a movie in my garage and I took an extra ( cheap ) 12 inch pioneer woofer out of an old unused speaker and fitted into a 55 gallon drum and hooked up a low powered denon. Hmmmm I said. I moved the speaker here and there in the drum, moved the drum upside down, on its side etc. Lots of bass. Uncontrolled bass, but there anyway. So I've been watching you all talk and looking at websites listening and learning. I am going to use an arsenal 12". It has a nice name and looks pretty mean. No need for over the top yet. I'm not too concerned with size. My wife understands that.[] I know placement is important, but right now I just want to build a nice sub and worry about all else later. I watched you guys talk and it seems 5.5 or so cubic feet is about right. I tried that program and entered the data wrong somehow. Who knows. A drawing, schematic or words of direction would be appreciated. Ports and braces ( support ) seem to be my weakest area. You point me in a direction and I'll build it. I'm a visual person. The heavier the better I say. As far as powering it, I'll worry about that later too. I have a ksw 12 now. I would like to put that back in my garage. So if your bored and what to chime in on specific build plans that would be sweet. Thanks for your time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWho Posted January 31, 2006 Share Posted January 31, 2006 When entering driver parameters be sure to turn off the auto calculation BEFORE your start entering any data. And then just leave fields that you don't have data for empty. The cheapest way to make a port is to go with a slot type, which winISD will help you build (click the circle and it changes to a rectangle). You should be able to get 110dB out of that driver with an F3 below 20Hz no problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay481985 Posted January 31, 2006 Share Posted January 31, 2006 Tell me you speaker your enclosure size how good woodworking you are bracing amp internal or external hekc what type what tools you have with a f3 below 20 that means ported or pr with the info I can draw up some autocad drawings. I charge 1 million dollars lol joking aside with the parameters give me a few days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyjoe72 Posted February 1, 2006 Author Share Posted February 1, 2006 Good morning.. Speaker- arsenal 12" Enclosure-program said closed 3.463 cubic feet ported 6.968 cubic feet Woodworking skills- I have all the tools. Bracing- That's where I need help. I will brace the way someone tells me. Amp- I would like an internal, but I would have to buy the speaker next week and buy the amp two weeks from now. I don't like to charge things. Amp advice would be greatful. I was looking at the internal Dayton amp at parts express. I'm using my play money. Ported or passive- you tell me. Which ever would have best results. I don't have much knowledge with all the numbers you put out. I understand Hz, decibals, the simple stuff. The numbers I punched into the program were mostly numbers to me. I couldn't tell you what 80% of them were[] It did look to me like the ported hit a lower hz. What is F3? I would like it to be taller rather than short and fat. If this effects the output one way or another, I will shape it accordingly. I eagerly await to be ordered what to do[] Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyjoe72 Posted February 1, 2006 Author Share Posted February 1, 2006 Just in case it matters, It will be complimenting a set of klf 20's, homemade center from scrapped klf 10 on ebay. ( $60 for guts + wood, what a steal ) and a set of cerwin vegas for rears soon to be replaced by my 20's when I find a pair of 30's close to me to put as mains. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan1045 Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 I bought a sub amp from parts express before christmas and am quite pleased with it. I did a lot of reading and the steeper cutoff you can have for the sub amp, the better. So I chose the 240 watt one with 24db/octave crossover. It works great with larger speakers and with a pair of small satellites. If you dont need gobs of power, this is a good one and they put it on sale quite often. Usually parts express ships free if the order is over $100 too. http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?&DID=7&Partnumber=300-804 Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyjoe72 Posted February 1, 2006 Author Share Posted February 1, 2006 Thanks for the info. I was originally looking at this one. Maybe this is overkill and I should look into a smaller amp. The arsenal 12 is 750 watts rms. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWho Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Thanks for the info. I was originally looking at this one. Maybe this is overkill and I should look into a smaller amp. The arsenal 12 is 750 watts rms. Bill I would go with that one or its smaller 500W brother - depending of course on your final needs. You will find the arsenal to be excursion limited and not power limited (in other words, you won't be coming close to the 750W RMS of the driver). Also, F3 = the point at which the frequency response is down 3dB...the -3dB point. It's just easier to say "F 3" than it is to say "minus three decibal point" [] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyjoe72 Posted February 1, 2006 Author Share Posted February 1, 2006 Thanks.. So, I take it the lower the F3, the lower the driver in a proper enclosure will hit. ( Deeper ). Also curious about driver not hitting 750 watts. If you have the capability of throwing 1000 watts at a 750 watt driver would that mean the amp is working less to its potential than the driver? With that in mind, if you were building it, would you opt for twice the power for 80 bucks or get the little brother? Maybe get the little brother, take that money and instead of porting it, put in a passive. Sorry about all the questions. Bill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay481985 Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 questions are quite alright, this is a learning forum As with amps, you should match amp with speaker, or have a slightly stronger amp Yes the amp would work less but if you over drive the speaker it will fail due to thermal limits porting and passive are mostly the same thing. Porting ischeaper, the passive sound better. But passives cost alot more and the thing is that passive are generally used for high excursion subs that porting will cause port distortion (too much air going into too small a hole) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyjoe72 Posted February 1, 2006 Author Share Posted February 1, 2006 I appreciate the info again. I believe I will go with a passive. Parts express has this one. There is a cheaper one for $25 but I won't get that cheap. A couple more questions if you guys wouldn't mind. 1. Is there a significant difference between ported and passive? Just for my records. Is it cleaner, deeper, louder to use passive? 2. Do I need to modify the box's size much to accommodate the passive? 3. Same question for the internal amp? 4. If I double layer the mdf all around, would it result in a better sounding output, or just a heavy sub?[] 5. If using passive, what position should they be in. Pointing directly away from each other I ***ume.[] 6. I've been tinkering and I think I will build it 21" w x 21" L x 28" H for 7.145 cubic feet not counting for amp space. I think thats right. This doesn't seem too big. The numbers I put in the program said it should be 6.968 cubic feet. Again, if I did it right. 7. How about spikes or feet for the beast? 8. To be continued[] Thanks guys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay481985 Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 I appreciate the info again. I believe I will go with a passive. Parts express has this one. There is a cheaper one for $25 but I won't get that cheap. A couple more questions if you guys wouldn't mind. 1. Is there a significant difference between ported and passive? Just for my records. Is it cleaner, deeper, louder to use passive? Just as the length and the wide of the port changes the tune of the sub, a pr specs also change it. Just because plopping a pr into an enclosure will not mean it will hit lower or louder. It needs to be in accordance with the specs. I didn't have the time to look at a model with that pr yet. 2. Do I need to modify the box's size much to accommodate the passive? you need to have a wall to mount it to 3. Same question for the internal amp? you need to cut a hole into the wall to mount it 4. If I double layer the mdf all around, would it result in a better sounding output, or just a heavy sub?[] Less vibrations and better sound.... Dr Who fill in this blank 5. If using passive, what position should they be in. Pointing directly away from each other I ***ume.[] Not necessarily, they can be in any way just it has to be verticle or the pr will not work. Meaning no horizontal mount cause the pr will sag and not get a full stroke 6. I've been tinkering and I think I will build it 21" w x 21" L x 28" H for 7.145 cubic feet not counting for amp space. I think thats right. This doesn't seem too big. The numbers I put in the program said it should be 6.968 cubic feet. Again, if I did it right. I know a 2X2X2 is 8 cubic feet external. the amp doesn't eat that much. 7. How about spikes or feet for the beast? spikes for hardwood and carpet. Rubber feet for wood. It all depends 8. To be continued[] I know it will [] Thanks guys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyjoe72 Posted February 1, 2006 Author Share Posted February 1, 2006 To be continued...too funny. Again thanks for all the info. Like I said, most of those specs I put into the program were jibberish to me. I believe I got them in right. Here are the specs... Arsenal 12 Specs Top of Page T/S Specs Driver Specs ZnomDual 4 ohms BL21 n/a Cutout diam. 11 ReDual 3.5 ohms Sd 530 cm2 Outer diam. 12.5 Fs27 Hz Mms196 g Mounting depth 6.5 Vas71.1 L Xmax20.5 mm Weight19 pounds Qms5.01Spl85.6 dB 1W/1M Voice Coil diam. 2.5 inch aluminum Qes.59Rec. Power 500 W Voice coil Dual 4 ohm Qts.538Rms750W ConePaper/Kevlar fibers Le1.8 mH Price $220.00$160.00 Warrranty3 years As far as mounting the amp, I just didn't know whether or not I needed to add size to make up the difference in space the amp would take up. Obviously, DrWho likes heavy equipment according to your remarks.[] Again thanks for the info. Can't wait to get started. I've got some ideas on some finishes to consider. I might mix and match a few this weekend just to experiment. About the braces, if I double it up on the mdf like I said, I shouldn't need braces should I? I've never had nor heard a sub with that much kick. Well, hopefully that much kick. I don't know how much vibration that is. I do no that 1 1/2 inches of mdf is pretty damn strong. I hear a cranberry and vodka calling my name. I'll check back.[] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWho Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 1. ports and passive radiators both work on the same premise. Both behave like springs that resonate at a certain frequency. The back wave from the active driver creates a pressure inside the cabinet which then stimulates the spring...effectively reversing the phase of the driver's back wave which is the entire goal (converting the back wave into usable acoustic energy). If you were to place the driver outside of a cabinet on the floor, you would barely hear any sound because the back wave cancels with the front wave (which is the entire purpose of building a cabinet in the first place). Anyways, there are slight differences between the behavior of ports and pr's. It's easier to look at the "large signal analysis" first. All the modelling we do in winISD is assuming that the system is perfectly linear, but we of course know this to not be the case. At higher SPL's, the air moving through the port starts to move faster. If it moves too fast, we hear it as a chuffing sound (the promedias are a perfect example of this). So it is neceassary to maintain a large enough cross-sectional area so that the movement of the air is restricted as little as possible...this of course requires the port to be much longer in order to maintain the same resonant frequency. But no matter what, you are always going to end up with some restriction to the air flow. This restriction causes the air to compress inside which then effectively increases the mass of the air in the port (one of the key variables to the resonant frequency). And this slight increase in mass actually ends up lowering the tuning point....it is for this reason that it is always better to tune a port slightly higher than what you calculate in winISD. Moving onto passive radiators...you don't have any air compression issues to worry about. All you need to do is make sure that the suspension of the PR behaves in a linear fashion. This of course will never be the case, but it's far more linear than ports. The other advantage to PR's is they don't take up any internal volume. The cabinet volume that you model in winISD is the free air space behind the driver....and you can't include the airspace inside the port, which usually means your cabinet needs to be an additional 1-2 cubic feet larger (depending on the port of course). PR's take up far less space. So what's the downside? well at very low SPL's the suspension is rather stiff when the PR needs to move like 1mm. So basically you don't get as much gain from the PR at low volume levels as you would at louder volumes. But most people aren't listening to music at 70dB and if they are....the difference wouldn't be percievable thanks to the fletcher-munson equal loudness curves. The only other downside is a quality PR is more expensive. I don't mean to make the PR sacrifices sound worse than they really are because the limitations of the design are far far far less than that of ports. 2. No, but you need to modify the end subwoofer size to accomodate for the extra volume that the port, bracing, and driver takes up. 4. The only side you should double up on is the face with the active driver, but even that is a bit overkill. You want to add bracing so that you minimize the area of free vibrating surfaces. Every time you cut the area in half, you raise the resonant frequency up an octave. The goal here is to move the resonance up out of the passband of the woofer (so resonance above 200Hz would be overkill). So after all that....bored or worn out yet? [] I haven't even touched on active driver nonlinearities either! But I'll skip that for now, I had an idea for your enclosure. 7 cubic feet looks real good btw. And it would go real well with two of these PR's: http://yellow.mynethost.com/~bv126368/shop/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=24&products_id=41&osCsid=ce3c88fb42523a98b356ce0952f8fbe7 It would result in an optimal 20Hz tuning for your cabinet. The downside is it will cost you $140. And then I would highly recommend going with the Dayton 1000W amp (which is actually only 500W into 8ohms). You will be excursion limited to 400W with both your active and passive drivers (yielding 112dB of output). You'll notice that the dayton 500 and 1000 watt amps have a slow roll off below 20Hz, which you can model with a high pass butterworth of order 3 at 18Hz. This just happens to be rather convenient because it totally controls the cone excursion below the tuning frequency (providing for much cleaner output). For the cabinet shape...I would recommend something similar to the RT-12d. It's an equilateral triangle looking down from the top - active driver on the front, and put the PR's on the sides. It tucks real nice into a corner this way too. And then you can just put the amplifier into the top panel facing up. If you don't like the aesthetics of this you can always build a "lid" for it. Or you can just go with a normal rectangular enclosure....active firing forward and PR's on the sides. amp on the back. Just try to avoid any two dimensions being the same (as these will amplify any standing waves). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay481985 Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 If you were to place the driver outside of a cabinet on the floor, you would barely hear any sound because the back wave cancels with the front wave (which is the entire purpose of building a cabinet in the first place). Umm I would beg to differ. Have you ever watched any adire audio video of the tumult outside an enclosure. The problem is the is no spring action and xmax is done relatively easy. btw goto realmofexcursion.com to see them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyjoe72 Posted February 1, 2006 Author Share Posted February 1, 2006 I don't know how to quote in here but....you wrote. So after all that....bored or worn out yet? [] I haven't even touched on active driver nonlinearities either! But I'll skip that for now, I had an idea for your enclosure. Nah..no way your boring me. I love learning this stuff. Knowledge is power right? But then again, so is a 1000 watt sub.[] I will look into designing some kind of plans for that new Klipsch sub. Might be a good challenge. Good evening all. About that driver not making noise...I remember about 15 years ago when the car subs were getting big, a gentleman at a retail store showed me that exact thing. The driver was going in and out 2 inches with just a whisper of air noise. Couldn't even hear a beat. Then he slowly dropped it into the cab and BAM! Thumping begins. Nothing outside the cabinet. I think it was a JBL. I can't remember. But I had hair[] Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay481985 Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 give me an idea of the size of the enclosure, what exact speaker (size), what thickness of the wood, bracing I can handle or you can. etc etc ported or pr etc etc you get the point as much info as you can give me and I can spit out autocad drawings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ancientdude Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 This is ontopic, is it possible and recommended to use any sub as a PR? It doesnt have to be specifically designed for it, does it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWho Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 This is ontopic, is it possible and recommended to use any sub as a PR? It doesnt have to be specifically designed for it, does it? short answer, no... A normal passive radiator does not have any kind of motor or magenet assembly. It is simply a cone connected to a frame with a spider and surround. The lack of a motor allows for much larger excursion possibilities. Also, a normal driver has much too high of a resonant frequency which makes for a very high tuning point... Umm I would beg to differ. Have you ever watched any adire audio video of the tumult outside an enclosure. The problem is the is no spring action and xmax is done relatively easy. btw goto realmofexcursion.com to see them I never said the driver doesn't move....it just isn't very loud - even with insane excursion. I was repairing a blown JBL 2226 when I noticed the problem...got her hooked up and running and high frequencies were there, but as I played lower test tones the sound quicly went away. In fact, the response of the driver drops off at 12dB/octave at frequencies where the radius of the driver is a 1/4 wavelength (so around 200Hz on a 15" driver). It was only until I dropped the driver into a cabinet that everything in the room started shaking. In fact, the reason the response drops off so fast below the tuning point is because the rear wave of the driver passes through the port and does the same cancelation with the front wave - the lack of resonance in the port doesn't reverse the phase of the back wave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyjoe72 Posted February 2, 2006 Author Share Posted February 2, 2006 Two things. I like the idea of the style of the rt-12d. Is it designed specifically for a corner placement or do you think it will work anywhere? I'm not real hip on the idea of having the amp on top but cosmetics are not really my main concern. I'll do it if you think it will sound better with this design. Also, cubic feet on a three sided box is throwing me off. Any help on a formula? Keep in mind the amp has Dimensions: 11-15/16" W x 11-15/16" H x 5-1/4" D. I'd have to modifiy the height to add more space on top for it, but at 7 cubic feet I don't think it will be an issue. I'm going to do some more searching on a formula for the area. toodles Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.