Jump to content

DAC Rated at 113 dB but Component System Rated at 116 dB


BE36

Recommended Posts

Can someone who understands more about electronics explain how the Moon 300D can be rated at 116 dB for Dynamic range but the DAC, Burr Brown PCM1793, it uses is rated at 113 Dynamic Range by it's manufacturer, Texas Instruments?

From Moon 300D Specs:

pe Solid
State
Front Panel Controls
Standby / Input
Selector
LED Indicators Locked Sampling
Frequency / Input
Digital Input Types S/PDIF (RCA) x 2
USB x 1 TosLink x 1
Digital Input
Impedance S/PDIF
75 Ω @ 0.5 Volts
DAC / Digital Filter BurrBrown PCM1793
Bit-depth range -
S/PDIF, Toslink
16 - 24 bits
Bit-depth range -
USB
16 bits
Sampling Frequency
Rate range - S/PDIF, Toslink
32, 44.1, 48, 88.2,
96, 176.4 and 192kHz
Sampling Frequency
Rate range - USB
32 - 48kHz
Frequency Response
(audible)
20Hz - 20kHz
+0/-0.2dB
Frequency Response
(full range)
2Hz - 72kHz +0/-3dB
THD @ 1kHz, 0dBFS
(A-weighted)
< 0.001 %
IMD < 0.004 %
Dynamic Range > 116dB
Signal-to-noise ratio > 115dB @ full
output

From Texas Instrument Specs

SLES076A − MARCH 2003 − REVISED JANUARY 2004

24??BIT, 192??kHz SAMPLING, ADVANCED SEGMENT, AUDIO STEREO DIGITAL??TO??ANALOG CONVERTER
FEATURES D 24-Bit Resolution
D Analog Performance:

Dynamic Range: 113 dB − THD+N: 0.001% − Full-Scale Output: 2.1 V rms (atPostamplifier)


D Differential Voltage Output: 3.2 V p-p
D 8× Oversampling Digital Filter: − Stop-Band Attenuation: –82 dB − Pass-Band Ripple: ±0.002 dB
D Sampling Frequency: 10 kHz to 200 kHz D System Clock: 128, 192, 256, 384, 512, or
768 fS With Autodetect
D Accepts 16-, 20-, and 24-Bit Audio Data
D Data Formats: Standard, I2S, and Left-Justified
D Digital De-Emphasis
D Soft Mute
D Zero Flags for Each Output
D Dual Supply Operation: − 5-V Analog, 3.3-V Digital

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A part only has to "make" spec. It could be much better than its rating when measured. The measured system response could be 116 as stated.

It's also not uncommon for electronic parts to be "screened" for performace, temperature rating, etc. I don't know if the identified component maker is screening, but it's possible.

Extreme example on a large piece of Silicon: Google reportedly has Intel screen parts for higher temperature ratings so their data centers can be run hotter and thereby save in cooling cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know for piston powered aircraft engines that 95% percent of engines manufactured have meet the rated power.

So an "Average" engine that is rated at 300HP is closer to 315 HP.

I thought maybe Burr Brown does something similiar, or as suggested Moon might do some screening and have all the other components be really good?

Or maybe it is "Marketing"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...