Jump to content

Harman Kardon Reciever...


Juba310

Recommended Posts

Hello, In the following months I am going to be saving up some cash to buy some speakers and a reciver. I have allready decided I am going to get RF-3II's for my front speakers...and im still deciding whether to get a centerchannel or a SVS sub instead. In the future I plan to add rear speakers for a 5.1 sytem. What I'm wondering, is what reciever I should purchase. I have heard that the Harman Kardon recivers complement klipsch speakers very well. Is this true? Or is there another brand I should look into? What I am going to be using my speakers for most is music, I'd say 75% music 25% DVD/movies. My budget for a reciever is going to be around 300 dollars. Two models that have taken my interest are the Harman Kardon AVR 125 and AVR-225. What is the main difference between the two? Will these work well with the RF-3IIs? Does anyone here that owns any of these particular models have any input?

Thanks, your help is appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the key is to go play with them at your local dealer(s) and see what you like. stick with the big names (H/K, Denon, Yamaha, Marantz) and you can't really go wrong IMHO.

some of the best advice i've learned on these forums is to OVERBUY on the speakers...and backfill from there.

.02

Link to comment
Share on other sites

----------------

On 1/27/2003 3:22:53 PM Juba310 wrote:

No one wants to answer me
15.gif

----------------

Sorry man, it's not that I have not wanted to answer you, but rather, I don't have any knowledge of the receivers your talking about buying. But I will tell you this. If you can at all save a few hundred dollars more, you should get the Harman Kardon AVR-520... It's what I have now and it is a work horse that will not let you down. It had a wonderful sound with the Klipsch. 1.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since you do not have anything yet, I would suggest that you find some used Klipsch heritage speakers. These are often very good bargains because people dont like their size or looks or both (neither of which is important when you want to enjoy the music). Next, I would find some used receivers, at a place where you can take them back. For less than $100, you can find some great two-channel receivers from yesterday (look for heft) that rival the cheap flimsy crap they are foisting on us today. After that, I would budget about the same amount for a powerful subwoofer. In my opinion, a powerful sub, without a lot of EQ or volume, does more for both music and movies than the bells and whistles of side effects from multi-channel; sound. Amongst name brand new receivers, Denon seems to have the better name here. Harmon-Kardon is only coming up lately.2.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting observation Denon Vs Harmon truth be told Harmon was always considered amongst the elite until they went main stream and quite honestly started producing less the quality gear. Denon is now heading down the same road. HK now is on par with Denon with the exception of its flagship Denon now has at least 3 or 4 models that has what the 8000 has on it or vastly more. Of course you can get the 8000 for less then those DENONS. I have a Yamaha and they to have gone down this road in the past few years. Their top stuff is still great but some of their low end stuff really sucks. Can you go wrong with HK or DENON prob not just make sure you buy it from a reputable dealer (authourized) and of course listen to both. Your ears will guide you my friend

So endeth the lesson 16.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Moon on this. Pay extra for some added features. You say you are using it more for music,so make sure it has 6 channel input for DVD-Audio or SACD. Which I believe the 520 does. Without looking at the specs,i can't remember what the differences are. I have hooked up both models for friends and think they are very good pieces.

I also agree that for awhile,that HK went a bit mainstream. But think they are trying to get back to what they are noted for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HK with out a doubt. I had HK in college and picked them for their wide bandwidth, reserve power (headroom), good square wave sign, good rise and slew rates, and overall sound. I've had Yamaha (no thanks) and went back to HK. Had the opportunity to compare to Denon (HK by a landslide), Adcom (HK by an edge), Rotel (HK less money but close), Onkyo (HK by far)...so I would consider HK. However, I have heard a lot of good things about Pioneer Elite (45 model). Marantz is not there yet - too many problems via a friends nightmare ownership. He is trying to trade for an HK. Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, enough "bells and whistles" have been added since DD/DTS receivers hit the shelves, that lots of folks are upgrading, making used units (like the Denon AVR-3300 that I use) an attractive option. I've had zero problems with this receiver. It might be a good way to go, with a tight budget.

fini

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...