Jump to content

Good article in the WSJ on cables


vman71

Recommended Posts

I applaud his effort – but I see a ton of logistical problems with his methods:

  1. “…a room with two sound systems, identical except for one component?” How were the systems set-up, with the loudspeakers stacked atop each other – side by side? Did he use a line level measurement and A/B/X switch box to make sure they were both the exact same volume?
  2. WAV files at what bit rate? Recorded how?
  3. “Great sound can come from popular, cheap gear.” Witness Oppo DVD players, Omega and Axiom loudspeakers, Trend and Sonic Impact chip amplifiers.
  4. The expensive Monster cables may be copper, but they have better construction and ends than plain wire. http://www.stereophile.com/cables/204monster/index1.html
  5. The golden ears of Stereophile heard the difference.
  6. What did the public pick for line conditioners?
  7. Wish he compared $20,000 cables – then you might have a controversy!
  8. How many people actually heard the systems? Remember, change on independent variable in the equation and you need 30 observations to make a statistically valid conclusion.
  9. Coupled to the most powerful personal computer on the planet – the one between our two ears - we excel at pattern recognition. Small wonder than that Portal Gome found “differences you might not pick up right away can become more apparent with extended listening.”
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...