Urizen Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 Thanks to the good folks at B&K Sound (Bob and Michael Crites), I transformed my La Scalas and KG 4 this weekend. For the La Scalas, new Type A/4500 Hz crossovers and Crites CT-125 tweeters. For the KG 4, new titanium diaphragms. Thanks for the speedy service, Messrs. Crites! Having refurbished the crossovers on my KG 4 some months ago, and hearing an improvement, I still found the K-74 horns a bit ragged sounding and muffled compared to other tweeters I've heard, although they still sounded pretty good, and much better on tubes than sand. Replacing the diaphragm on the K-74 tweeter horn is super easy. The only tools needed are a Phillips head screwdriver, a pair of pliers, and a multi-meter (to check for Ohms and continuity). Eight screws attach each horn to the cabinets and three small nuts hold each driver to the horns. The old phenolic diaphragms had ferro-fluid surrounding the voice coils, so there was no cleaning of the gap needed. Bob told me on the phone that the old phenolic measured -3 dB at 18kHz, and the new titanium are -1dB at 23kHz. Comparing one to the other, the titanium definitely extends higher, has more air and is dramatically smoother. The old tweeter sounded "hollow" and slightly distorted, comparing them side by side. Sibilance has been all but eliminated. The difference is not subtle. The La Scalas were a little more difficult due to the awkwardness of working inside their tops. Four screws hold each AL crossover in place. As you can see in the pic below, the AL crossover has a bunch of extra components that are said to make it the poorest sounding crossover ever used in this model. The new Type A-4500 Hz Crites crossover is so much simpler, and I've always found the simpler, the better, when it comes to an audio signal path. The Crites boards come with Velcro tabs to attach them inside the cabinets. It's much easier to remove the tweeter with the speaker's baffle face-down on the floor. It's difficult to get leverage on the screws which hold the tweeter to the baffle when it's upright. The only damage is one slightly skinned knuckle. It's tight in there. The CT-125 is a drop-in replacement for the K-77 with no modification of the cabinet needed. I listened to them for about 30 minutes, comparing the difference between the modded and stock cabs. What's immediately audible is a "toning down" of the squawker, higher extension and smoothness of the tweeter, and tightening up of the bass. The first speaker took 30 minutes, compared to 10 minutes on the second. With both finished, I just spent a few hours listening. Amazing, killer dynamics. Startling at times. The speakers have slam, which they didn't have before, and that's with just 5 WPC SEP behind them. I've finally, with the help of the Crites boys, heard La Scalas disappear. Thanks Bob & Michael! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbsl Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 what year are your La Scalas? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverSport Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 beauty...I may have to try new diphragms...nice set up and welcome... Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urizen Posted September 14, 2008 Author Share Posted September 14, 2008 1988. Thanks for the welcome, Silversport. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Normo Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 Nice job, I see from your pictures that the La scalas are against the wall. Is this the best position for the speakers. I just got a pair, and am trying to figure out where they might sound best. Thanks for the post. Norm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvel Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 Nice job, I see from your pictures that the La scalas are against the wall. Is this the best position for the speakers. I just got a pair, and am trying to figure out where they might sound best. Thanks for the post. NormI think about every room is going to be different. I had mine against the long wall in my living room, but I couldn't get far enough back from them. I have since rotated 90 degrees and have them on each side of the opening leading into the room. Pulled in from the sides a bit. Now the imaging is way better, and in MY room, the bass is better too. They would benefit from corner, corner/wall placement, but you just need to experiment. I have mine toed in a little bit, but not aimed directly at the center of the couch. The converging point would be behind me a bit. This gives me a slightly wider sweet spot. Bruce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urizen Posted September 14, 2008 Author Share Posted September 14, 2008 Thanks, Normo. I tried them further from the back wall, but they were overwhelming. They load this room best where I've shoehorned them in. It's a nearfield setup, for sure. Ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.