Jump to content

Lockheed Fusion


WMcD

Recommended Posts

post-7390-0-53480000-1413906354_thumb.pn

 

Doesn't look too promising for drillers, DR.  80 percent is used for fuel.  For natural gas, it's probably at least 95% though I didn't look it up.  Wells already drilled would supply the planet for centuries.  My home state of Texas would lose 20% of it's economy.  Still...worth it.  Back to the ranch, I suppose.  

 

McGuire says conversion of an NG natural gas electric generating plant will consist of simply connecting the fusion box to the heat inlet and disconnecting the gas.

 

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seawater distillation and centrifuging: all the fuel comes from seawater--heavy hydrogen.  The byproducts of using this fuel have a safe-release period of ~100 years, i.e, helium isotopes, which go up to high altitudes and disperse if accidentally released.  There is more deuterium and tritium energy from seawater available for fusion use than many times the total energy expenditures of humans on earth have ever used: it's basically limitless.

Edited by Chris A
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No argument, Chris.  However, He3, which the lunar dust is rotten with, is totally clean.  Even the relatively low end of life containment vessel radioactivity (compared to fusion reactors) associated with deuterium/tritium is eliminated.  The ideal fuel, actually cleaner than solar.

 

Dave

Edited by Mallette
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...