Jump to content

Mullah Bush and the American Taliban strike again


Recommended Posts

----------------

On 3/6/2004 6:10:06 PM RickB wrote:

Wow, do you think that after we ban everyone that you don't like from the airwaves maybe we could burn some books you don't agree with too? I mean you wouldn't want to take a chance that grandma and the little tykes might go to the library without you looking over their shoulder.

----------------

Who said anything about banning "everyone I don't like"? Did you miss the part about community standards?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

moon,

It's not really an issue for me personally; I just don't listen to that junk. But, I am concerned about my kids. I don't want them hearing the filth that is put out these days. And as far as I know, there is no "v-chip" for radio.

Allen,

Yeah, whatever you say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

----------------

On 3/6/2004 4:14:57 PM James D McCall wrote:

Freedom of speech in America has ALWAYS had limits. Try running into your local cineplex screaming "FIRE" at the top of your lungs. Likewise, there has always been community-based standards of decency that set bounds for what can be said on radio, shown on TV, etc. But now, the filth-mongers are trying to wrap themselves in the first amendment in order to justify their depravity.

In my opinion, anything that goes out on the airwaves for all to hear and see, should be FIT for ALL to hear and see. From grandma down to the little tykes.

Comparing Howard Stern to Rush Limbaugh is one of the more ridiculous things I've seen lately. Stern and all of those "shock jocks" like him should be banned from the airwaves.

----------------

You've missed the entire point, and I'm not going to explain it all again.

When they come knocking on your door for saying something the Government didn't like, you'll understand what I'm talking about.

By that point, I'll have already sought political asylum in someplace like Denmark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

----------------

On 3/6/2004 9:19:09 PM James D McCall wrote:

moon,

It's not really an issue for me personally; I just don't listen to that junk. But, I am concerned about my kids. I don't want them hearing the filth that is put out these days. And as far as I know, there is no "v-chip" for radio.

Allen,

Yeah, whatever you say.

----------------

Yep, I agree with you 100%. If I was given only two choices.. Ban or not ban and let him keep with his filth on the raidio? I would choose to ban him. I'm just trying to reach a happy medium is all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allen,

I like and respect you but, if you read the FCC Directive I cited and the Communications act of 1934 as Ammended. Lewdness and profanity are prohibited on the public airwaves. The "Community Standard" that you refer to is from a decision of the Supreme Court that applied to the showing of pornographic material in a place of business for profit. Redeeming Social Value also is a term from a Supreme Court decision.

The Supreme Court has not, to my knowledge, ever ruled that the "Community Standard" thesis be applied to the public airwaves. Mr Stern and others of his ilk have a long history of being fined by the FCC for indecency. It was a cost of doing business. It was Clear Channel's corporate decision to stop airing his program not the FCC. If anything or anyone shuts off Mr. Stern's cash cow it will be himself and his "shock jock" programing. He must have known that his ride could/would not last forever. If he didn't he has overstated his selfproclaimed omniverance and superiority.

Personally, I don't have an axe to grind in this battle. I have never heard Mr. Stern's program and have no wish to do so. His show is not broadcast in the Providence market on any station I normally listen to. He may be on one of those rap or New Wave FM stations I don't know but, I have never seen any publicity about the show locally.

I'm sure that he is not on the Jazz station that you listen to and if he were would you take your precious time to listen to the likes of Mr. Stern?

Rick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

----------------

On 3/6/2004 11:21:34 PM mobile homeless wrote:

m00n, is there any way we can BAN that avatar of yours?

kh

----------------

Sure, ask the powers that be.. If they want me to change it I will. However, my avitar is not offensive is it?2.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Howard Stern was fined ONCE by the FCC in 1995! That's it. And now soon after he spent the last few weeks raking the Bush administration over the coals POOF! here comes Clear Channel who is one of Bush's biggest supporters and donors and pulls him off the air in six markets. What was the big infraction? A CALLER dropped an "N" bomb when talking about African-Americans and Stern immediately hung up on him. THAT'S the reason Clear Channel gave! Viacom will drop Stern in the next few weeks due to pressure from this American Taliban. And Stern will be PAID IN FULL FOR THE REMAINDER OF HIS CONTRACT!

I have listened to Howard Stern from time to time over the past 15 years or so and his show is FAR from lewd. It's HILARIOUS, a good old fashioned American side-show on the radio. I'm not a huge fan, but the show IS funny and is NOT lewd!

If you haven't heard the show you have NO right to comment on the content!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alan, do you have children? Teens? If so, would you really mind them listening to him? If you don't have children, then you may not understand where parents would have an issue. On the other hand if you do have children, and you would not mind them listening to his show that's fine, to each his own. Myself, I know I don't need or want my children listening to his filth.

As an adult, I personally don't have that big of an issue with is humor. But no mater how you slice and dice it, his show is not acceptable for all audiences and unfortunitly, all audiences have free and easy access to it.1.gif

Oh and yes I have heard his show. It's syndicated here where I live. I've listened to it many Many MANY times. I'm not sure how you can say it's not lewd. Everytime I turn it on, something lewd is coming from him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a 5-year-old, m00n, and I very simply do not listen to the smut station (106.9 "the Bear" out of Blacksburg) when he's in the car. I like their playlists, but all their DJ's are raunchy, and Lex&Terry is on from 6-10am, so I avoid it.

By the time he's old enough to control the FM dial (teenager) he's going to be hearing all that crap at school anyhow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6) Weak people prefer to be ruled. Rulers like weakness and for people to fight amongst themselves...it makes the job of ruling so much easier. Rulers always have the best interests of those who they rule over at heart. Especially if they are good looking or wealthy. Then you should vote for them for sure. Never mind what they say. Never mind what they do. Don't ask too many questions. A peak behind the curtain could upset them...

8) Weak people have thin skin. Sticks and stones have pretty much been outlawed, so now we've got to go to work on outlawing certain names (words).

========================

My Great Uncle Fred would just be gigggling.

Newbies have great posts!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...