Jump to content

Pre/Pro or Receiver Suggestions


MPNX2

Recommended Posts

I am looking to upgrade my HK AVR7200 (if its worthwhile). I was thinking of getting a good Pre/Pro setup since I am moving into a new home after it is completed with an HT room. The room measures 19X19 with a 14' tray ceiling. I am also upgrading my speakers to the new Ref flagships and an SVS PB-12 Plus/2. I have looked at the new Sunfire stuff online but it sure seems a bit pricey. I would estimate my budget to be about 3K for the Pre/Pro setup. I welcome all of your comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with the 19X 19 you will get some nasty room nodes..... Its a perfect square which is not great at all for acoustics.

As for pre/pro I'd look for nads they sell some good stuff for reasonable prices. And again the RF-83 will not sound as good with the room being the shape it is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm that is an interesting room. Again I will say try nads or use the reciever you have as an pre and as there is much talk lately about using crown or qsc pro amps to power their speakers. People say the crown and qsc sound just as good as the big guys like Aragon, Rotel etc. Might be worth it to do a search on that. Its also a hell of a lot cheaper that way too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too am trying to figure out a change in my system. Have any of you had experience with how the Nad or Outlaw type gear sounds in 2 channel analog audio situations?

Do they present a good sound with vinyl, cds, etc. I am wanting to get tube amps for 2 channel and then ss for the rest of the surround sound uses and am wondering how clean and so forth these units sound. I've been told that the NAD is rather musical in 2 channel. Is it much more so than my Yammy that I am currently using.

Thanks for comments, Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Outlaw combo seems like its price right. I can get the 990 processor and the 7700 amp for $3300. Would this be a big improvment over my current HK AVR 7200?

My experience... moved my HK 7200 to bedroom duty. Bought Outlaw 990/7500.

Huge improvement - cleaner, better seperation etc.

Added QSC plx 2402 amp for mains. Drastic improvement - cleaner still, huge sound,

dead quiet, bass has come alive & hits hard (this fact confuses me).

The QSC fan isn't noticable at any appreciable volume.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another alternitive is to use my HK AVR7200 and use the pre outs on it and use a 5 channel amp. Has anyone used the pre outs on the 7200. I thought about and Earthquake Cinenova....

I tried my Outlaw 7500 with my HK. The sound was really nice. The Outlaw forum says it is

basically a rebadged ATI amp. I would describe the sound as neutral.

When I put the 990 back in place of the HK the sound is just more pleasing to my ears.

Much more live like, which is what i'm seeking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big fan of using recievers as a pre-amp stage. If you do your

research you'll notice that there are very few chips on the market

being used and each chip pretty much requires the same

implementation...so you're getting close to the top of the line preamp

quality with just the normal everyday receiver (of course nobody wants

anyboy to know this) [;)] My personal favorites are the Denon recievers

sporting the "Burr-Brown Dacs" ya, it's mostly marketing, but they are

still good chips.

The other nice thing about going this route is that you can start with

just a dedicated 2-channel amp for your mains and keep everything

powered off the reciever...it's usually cheaper to find a 2-channel amp

that you like versus swapping out 5,6,7 channel amps - and then of

course you've got all the other benefits of dedicated amps. Depending

on the amp you get you can then purchase a multi-channel version in the

same family for the rest of the speakers or you can just duplicate it

all around (for a total of 4 amps - leaving one unused channel).

But before you go playing with electronics I would highly recommend

tackling the acoustics of your room. You can spend thousands for

differences in nuance, or you can spend a few hundred and bring your

system to a whole new level. If aesthetics are an issue then you can

expect it costing a bit more, but the difference is definetly worth the

hassle. And then after that you can start worrying about nuances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big fan of using recievers as a pre-amp stage. If you do your research you'll notice that there are very few chips on the market being used and each chip pretty much requires the same implementation...so you're getting close to the top of the line preamp quality with just the normal everyday receiver (of course nobody wants anyboy to know this) [;)] My personal favorites are the Denon recievers sporting the "Burr-Brown Dacs" ya, it's mostly marketing, but they are still good chips.

The other nice thing about going this route is that you can start with just a dedicated 2-channel amp for your mains and keep everything powered off the reciever...it's usually cheaper to find a 2-channel amp that you like versus swapping out 5,6,7 channel amps - and then of course you've got all the other benefits of dedicated amps. Depending on the amp you get you can then purchase a multi-channel version in the same family for the rest of the speakers or you can just duplicate it all around (for a total of 4 amps - leaving one unused channel).

But before you go playing with electronics I would highly recommend tackling the acoustics of your room. You can spend thousands for differences in nuance, or you can spend a few hundred and bring your system to a whole new level. If aesthetics are an issue then you can expect it costing a bit more, but the difference is definetly worth the hassle. And then after that you can start worrying about nuances.

The room has not been completed yet. For all I know my current equipment may sound a lot better in the new environment. It doesnt sound bad now. I was looking to upgrade just because the area that I am trying to fill with the sound is going to be alot larger. Also, I will be upgrading my current RF-35 setup to the new flagship line so I was looking for some more power since I know that Klipsch recommends that the RF-7 line have 200 watts.

Do you happen to have a prefernece on what amps I should be looking for? I like the way the HK sounds with the RF-35's being that I am in a small town and I am about 120 miles for a city that would have dealers to audition the equipment in I was looking for a short list for when I do happen to make the trip to listen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like the Sunfire Theatre Grand or whatever they call it

multichannel amps...very smooth, but ballsy sound and should work

wonders with that "lacking" midrange in the RF7's.

I personally like to go with pro gear and would use something like the Crown K2:

http://www.crownaudio.com/amp_htm/k.htm

2 ohm stable and 500W into 8ohms - cleanest amp you'll find. (It

doesn't exactly double down probably due to heat issues and not so much

the amp topology).

I'm not a huge fan of Rotel or Mcintosh because they have a "flavored"

sound - if you dig it then great, go that route, but I'm more about the

transparency than signature sound.

Btw, the 200W recommendation for the RF-7 has more to do with the fact

that most of those amps can handle low impedance swings well. I believe

they dip as low as 2.5 ohms? (I forget) which means you'll need a "2

ohm stable" amp and preferably one where the output doubles for every

halving of frequency (so 50W into 8 ohms, 100W into 4 ohms, 200W into 2

ohms).

As far as your new room, is it a dedicated room? And are there already

plans for the acoustical treatment? The building stage is the best time

to implement a lot of the tricks without hurting the aesthetics of the

room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MPNX2,

I've heard nothing but good things about the Outlaw, so you may want to check these out.

My suggestion (because I'm a die hard fan) is go Lexicon. Their new (well, not new anymore) receiver, the RV-8 has gotten TREMENDOUS reveiws, and having used their little-brother-to-the-flagship MC-8 pre/pro, I know how flexible Lexicon can be. Plus Logic 7 just rocks!! I'm not sure, but a toned down version of L7 is featured in teh HK receivers also... so you may already be familiar with it.

I was just going through Audiogon for you, and I didn't see any RV-8's... I did see a couple MC-8's for sale for a good price... you can add amps to that and perhaps even still stay within budget.

http://cls.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls.pl?homeproc&1155505654

Other than that, a good price for the RV-8 (used) would be around 3,500. I don't have blue book access to Audiogon, so I don't know for sure, but that would be my guess.

Good luck!

-Fauzi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With so choices out there it is hard to make a decision. I have seen some Outlaw components used as well as B&K, Lexicon, and Rotel. I have also ran across some of the Aragon stuff a Stage One and the 2007 amp is anyone filimar with these?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...