Jump to content

tubelover

Regulars
  • Posts

    217
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by tubelover

  1. A very sensible response re: Mac vs. Scott
  2. Nothing personal, but I think you will find other monos to sound much better than the Macs. Mcintosh product are OK from a nostalgic and collectors point of view. Besides that, and from strcitly a performance staindpoint, forget it. JMHO
  3. ---------------- On 6/20/2004 4:37:29 PM djk wrote: Somebody really wanted this set bad, $309 http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=61378&item=5704998416&rd=1 How about a nice pair in oiled walnut for $282 ? http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=61378&item=5704131922&rd=1 ---------------- Give the poor kid a break.
  4. So, you think MC-30's sound good? Wait until you hear a nice pair of Dynaco Mark III's!
  5. ---------------- On 6/19/2004 8:46:46 PM chops wrote: For one thing, the both of you have to go back and read your very stuck up posts. THINK BEFORE YOU SPEAK!!! It is exactly those types of comments that fire off these "stupid" arguments every single time in this forum! I wasn't even talking to either one of you to begin with, so why try and screw with me?! And don't even say you weren't! Your tone in that post sounded like this... "You own a Hyundai? What the hell are you doing here with us?!" OR "I wouldn't be caught dead in that site because of the cheap Hyundais!" All of you think you are too good for the next person, and that you will not except someone for who or what they are until they have something in common with you. You people need some serious help. ---------------- chops, we do have something in common. We both own Klipsch speakers. Other than that?? You seem to be another one of these guys who take this BB much too seriously. You're wound up like a top. See if maybe your doctor will prescribe some valium for you. It has worked wonders for several Forum members.
  6. I do not see that anyone spoke for you garymd. Who is tube-head? I am tired of the insults.
  7. ---------------- On 6/19/2004 8:25:24 PM chops wrote: The both of you are absolutely stupid!! Saying I have too much free time on my hands?! I can come on this site any time of day, and day of the week and find you same stupid morons on here every time. So who has all the time in the world?! LOOK WHO'S TALKING YOU FREAKING HIPOCRITS!!!!! ---------------- Now, now chops. These are precisely the type of comments that the moderators will not tolerate any more. Please be careful with the name calling. Thank you.
  8. ---------------- On 6/19/2004 8:15:32 PM garymd wrote: I'm sorry Chops. Nothing personal against you or Hundais but you'd have to pay me some serious cash to spend more then 5 minutes in that forum. ---------------- I agree garymd.
  9. ---------------- On 6/19/2004 8:03:30 PM chops wrote: ---------------- On 6/19/2004 7:54:21 PM paulparrot wrote: ---------------- On 6/19/2004 7:27:39 PM chops wrote: SCORE!!!! That was for Jaz BTW. ---------------- Come on, Chops, you must tell us what these two forums are that you supposedly moderate. They must be a riot. ---------------- Supposedly?! You're a funny guy, so you think. Alright, I'll play your game. However, I'll only give you one of them for now, and if you're a good little boy, I'll give you the other one. BTW, take a close look at the picture and link right in the middlw of the page. Yes, that's my car. However, when the Admin put it in there, he entered the "wheel horsepower" as the "crank horsepower" which is really 163HP, where stock was 138HP. ANYWAY........ Read and weep.... http://www.sonataspeed.com/ ---------------- I do have to admire your courage. It takes huge b*lls to admit that you own a Hyundai? OMG, that is funny! The sonataspeed.com website is a joke, correct?
  10. ---------------- On 6/19/2004 6:40:06 PM jazman wrote: "If some of the SET folks want to enjoy unmolested discussions, they should quit making their recommendations in such a way that fosters a spirit of exclusivity, and in such a way that doesn't infer these devices are the most transparent, involving, musical devices ever to grace the planet -- and anyone who can't hear it -- are just deaf and dumb mutes. You know, we didn't start this "war", they did " Horsepucky!!!!!! Dean, It's very revealing that you have finally admitted to your "War" with respect to low powered SET. You and your associates past actions are now clear. Next, I guess is low powered gaincards. You're full of it to infer that anyone has ever fostered a spirit of exclusivity when it comes to SET amps. This is pure bull from you. These types of parnoid or inferiority fear rantings are part of the problem. I mentioned the following in another post. Did you bother to hit the home page from the vintage amp post? If not, go back and check it out. The survey there seemed to indicate that the majority of people voted the best sound was "Single ended". Are you going to claim that people who have nothing to do with your paranoia, or this forum, are also plotting against you? Why do you object to attirbutes long associated with good single ended design being voiced? Leave this forum and find other internet postings will describe many of the things you are so offended by, posted in abundance. One or two instances praising SET amps could be easily discounted. The numbers are just too great for that. If an individual wishes to explore the world of SET amplification, that is their right!! Yet, you and your associates continue with attemps to interfere with any exchange of SET information. What are you afraid of? If it's bad advice, or even false information, the individuals will come back and say so. All members of the forum will then know so. You, Parrot, NOSValves, or anyone else with such a fragile psyche needs to simply butt out. Klipsch out. ---------------- The same old propoganda. Someone loves to see themself type. The agenda is the same, and it is getting rather old.
  11. ---------------- On 6/19/2004 6:40:06 PM jazman wrote: "If some of the SET folks want to enjoy unmolested discussions, they should quit making their recommendations in such a way that fosters a spirit of exclusivity, and in such a way that doesn't infer these devices are the most transparent, involving, musical devices ever to grace the planet -- and anyone who can't hear it -- are just deaf and dumb mutes. You know, we didn't start this "war", they did " Horsepucky!!!!!! Dean, It's very revealing that you have finally admitted to your "War" with respect to low powered SET. You and your associates past actions are now clear. Next, I guess is low powered gaincards. You're full of it to infer that anyone has ever fostered a spirit of exclusivity when it comes to SET amps. This is pure bull from you. These types of parnoid or inferiority fear rantings are part of the problem. I mentioned the following in another post. Did you bother to hit the home page from the vintage amp post? If not, go back and check it out. The survey there seemed to indicate that the majority of people voted the best sound was "Single ended". Are you going to claim that people who have nothing to do with your paranoia, or this forum, are also plotting against you? Why do you object to attirbutes long associated with good single ended design being voiced? Leave this forum and find other internet postings will describe many of the things you are so offended by, posted in abundance. One or two instances praising SET amps could be easily discounted. The numbers are just too great for that. If an individual wishes to explore the world of SET amplification, that is their right!! Yet, you and your associates continue with attemps to interfere with any exchange of SET information. What are you afraid of? If it's bad advice, or even false information, the individuals will come back and say so. All members of the forum will then know so. You, Parrot, NOSValves, or anyone else with such a fragile psyche needs to simply butt out. Klipsch out. ---------------- Tiring at best. Thanks Doc.
  12. Wow, I sure hope you kept the receipt for that Yamaha?
  13. I am glad that someone noticed how sensitive I can be. Thank you for your concern but there is no need to feel bad for me. I will be alright. I need a shoulder to cry on to release my pent up emotions. This is a sad day indeed. Who will be the spokesman for 1.8W now? P.S. what is ludes?
  14. ---------------- On 6/18/2004 6:26:45 PM AK-4 wrote: Dee, did you get my mail/PM Tubelover, I think Mark is getting ready to release the Juicy Music Pink Grapefruit cables. ---------------- I wonder if they will be expensive? Expensive = good.
  15. When will you give it a rest? Your obvious dislike of the man and his products is apparent to most everyone. If you don't like them, don't buy them. Quit trying to criticize, second guess, and thrash everything he is about. Live and let live for cryin out loud. He designs what he does for a reason. If you can do better, have at it. Sheesh! I for one don't care for set amplification. That's my choice.
  16. Does Juicy Music have anything that is pink in the works?
  17. Cockroach #28 present and accounted for sir!
  18. ---------------- On 6/18/2004 12:31:39 PM garymd wrote: I saw her. We hammered a few nails together. ---------------- Hammering nails with you was an experience I will never forget garymd.
  19. What would we do without all the self-proclaimed English gurus? Remember, no one is perfect.
  20. Hasta la vista to all the non conformers. Who needs them of they cannot adjust.
×
×
  • Create New...