Jump to content

JohnA

Heritage Members
  • Posts

    5887
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by JohnA

  1. On 12/29/2023 at 1:36 AM, Flevoman said:

    Perhaps your question is a bit too open-ended. Are you expecting everyone to post an extensive list of tubes along with an explanation of how they sound? Or do you mean which tube sounds most pleasant in their system and why?

     

    Not single-ended?

    • Haha 2
    • Confused 1
  2. That receiver is probably putting out 40 watts, or so, per channel with all channels driven, so you might well use more power, though I doubt you NEED it.  Look at 5-channel power amps from Acurus, Parasound, Integra, Emotiva, Marantz, even Rotel.  Stay under 150 watts/channel, because your speakers can't handle more and these brands will be under-rated. 

     

    Also, remember, double the power and get 3 dB more per speaker.  Three dB is a just detectable difference under loud conditions.  Meaning, even 150 w/ch will not add a shattering increase in loudness (not quite 6 dB).  But that increase may require more subwoofers in order to maintain balance. 

    • Like 1
  3. I'll recommend you look at Yamaha integrated amps and receivers that are available in silver (the better quality ones).  I am initially quite pleased with the smooth, relaxed sound my R-N600ASL is producing through my H IVs.  It replaced a rebuilt 1979 Technics receiver, that was good if not pushed.  Also have a look at Marantz and also Emotiva, like the BasX TA1.  You do not need more than 50 watts.  You might be surprised at the sound of new amps as Soundcraftsman amps had a reputation for high distortion in the 0 to 5 watt range, where you will operate when you are not damaging your hearing.  What I remember is that by 10 to 20 watts they were said to be sounding pretty good. 

    • Like 1
  4. Since Tidal and Qobuz both claim 16/44 how does Qobuz sound better?  Maybe less buffering? 

     

    I stream a lot of audio on my Integra Pre/Pro, but it is usually mp3 based. 

     

    I abandoned my turntable after I found 24/192 DVD-A.  That makes me tempted to go hi-rez. 

    • Like 1
  5. On 12/16/2023 at 5:46 AM, Flevoman said:

    I'm currently pondering the best approach to address my issue. It could be through a lengthy detailed text or perhaps a shortcut. I'll opt for the shortcut.

    The LaScala 1 was known for its cabinet resonance. I believe this was addressed by placing a wedge in the bass cabinet to reduce the resonance. The LaScala II and the AL-5 have thicker walls. Is the general assumption that this completely eliminates the resonance? Or is there still some resonance present, and could, for example, a wedge in the bass cabinet still provide improvement?

     

    I have 1980 LA Scala's.  It appears to me that the bass horn has 2 minor issues.  The similar Peavey FH-1s I owned and tested had a similar response rise between 100 and 200-ish Hz.  In addition, my La Scala's sidewalls will vibrate, but I didn't notice (and feel it) it until I played "I Don't Need No Doctor" at concert levels.  I'm sure I was peaking over 100 watts.  Later that session I lost 4 subwoofer drivers to heat!  At more sane levels, 100 dB and under, I don't hear or feel anything.  The AL-5 La Scalas can only be better, less resonant at high volumes. 

     

    I got to spend 30+ minutes with them alone in a room at the KHMA at Subfest.  Even at quite loud levels, they were polished and refined and threw a stereo image that make mine envious.  Though instantly familiar, I did not notice the "resonance" at peaks easily approaching 100 dB. 

     

    Bottom line, everything flexes, bends and resonates, but this is an overstated issue when the speakers are used at home and the resonance can be enjoyable on some music. 

    • Like 4
  6. 1 hour ago, Agron said:

    Hello everyone,

    Can I recone KP-43E with other model to get lower Fs?

     

     

    Most likely.  Look on the back of the cone for an ink stamped part number for the cone.  Then, look for the EIA date code, usually 6 digits, like 67-YYWW, on the magnet, to verify it was made by Eminence (67).  Then call them and ask. 

    • Like 1
  7. I got a quote from Audio Classics to make for boxes to ship the McIntosh gear.  They want $150 (shipped to CHI)  for a box for the MR74, MI3 & C26.  They want $175 for the 2505.  The buyer will pay for further shipping, but at least you can have a high expectation they will arrive undamaged. 

     

    I looked them up and the prices Gil is asking are very nice.  See page 6.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...