Nismo

Yes I can. He's building the system, possibly in stages. If he first goes with RP-280FA's... he can test out how he enjoys Atmos... without the need to purchase RP-140SA's. That initial investment with integrated 280FA's would only be $2400. ============= If he were to use RP-280F's (non-Atmos)... he would eventually have to purchase (2-pair) of RP-140sa's = $2200. Building his Atmos HT... he would automatically start out saving $$ not spent on a lesser speaker & get a best option (280FA) in the process. If later, as he builds the Atmos HT.. he can add a pair of RP-140SA for the rear. Then it would be a $700 difference, but it would be a well spent $700.

The theory of a simulated Universe has gain popularity over the years. Even Will Wright (creator of the SIMS) subscribes to the possibility. Same with Nick Bostrom & Brian Greene:

They will be showcased at the 2015 SYMCO in Boston.

The center channel was not in that mix. Only towers & possible add-on. ============= RP-280F $1200 RP-140SA: $1000 (2 pair) Total: $2200 ============= RP-280FA: $2400

Oh my bad, they must give you $99 off if you get two. Well that changes everything. If $$$ is an issue... $160 extra in my pocket means a lot.

Sounds like you are considering an Atmos HT complete with new towers. In that instance, since you're starting fresh, take your time & build it as budget allows. Rather than RP-280F towers with add-on RP-140SA's at a later date... save & get the RP-280FA's (with integrated Atmos speaker). The Atmos speaker with the 280FA is a better offering than the 140SA (add-on). And the difference in (msrp) is only $200 for the better option. Money well spent (especially long term). And, as mentioned the RP-450C would be a good consideration. But, no need for the RP-450CA, unless your towers are also Walnut (the RP-450C & the RP-450CA are the same speaker with different finishes). There's no such thing as an Atmos Center speaker.

Just a generic chart for comparison. Every room is different with any speaker. I've demo'd the big brother (dual driver) XS30se & the extension is superior to that of the SVS SB-2000, no question. The (single driver version) the XS15se should also best the SB-2000. In a few weeks I'll know.

Not sure where you get $1600. Dual R-115SW: $1440 Dual PSA XS15se: $1499 Plus they both include shipping & 30 day trial... with free return shipping if need. $1,000 - $1,500 is pretty standard for subs in that category. I'll leave the R&D to the experts. Same for the research, learning curve, required tools & equipment for a DIY project.

Note: The reason I switched gears & brought up the possibility of dual XS15se (from PSA)... is that you also mentioned you could possibly swing dual Klipsch R-115SW's. Dual XS15's are only $60 more than dual R-115SW. And, dual XS15se, have a smaller footprint than the R-115SW (& has more output 550w continuous with PSA vs 400w continuous with Klipsch).

Haa, your're right! But your space is also larger than mine, which would benefit from a 15".... or (if budget allows) a pair of 15's. Don't get me wrong, the SB-2000's were great, just didn't qualify as a significant "upgrade" for my needs (my existing subs were in perfectly working condition). Earlier, I did bring home the substantial PSA XS30se with (front & rear) dual 15" drivers. I experienced a few technical issues with it & ultimately had to return it. Placement was also tricky in my space with dual drivers, & I only had (1) XS30se in place, so that was a lot of output & extension coming from one side of the room & made the room unbalanced. But when it was working well... (despite making the room unbalance) it was impressive with both extension & output. The perfect solution for me is that there is a 15" single driver version of the (dual driver) XS30se.... the XS15se. That way I can have (2) XS15's in my room, making it balanced & even. Plus (at 18 x 17 x 19.5 tall), the XS15 has a much smaller footprint than the larger XS30 (18 x 23.5 x 22.5), making placement even easier. For quite some time the XS15 was out of production, but PSA is bringing them back for a small production run, they will be ready in a week or two. If you can swing it, consider the XS15se from PSA. But, since production run is limited, if you want dual subs (2)... get them both now, because you might not be able to get another one later down the road. http://www.powersoundaudio.com/collections/subwoofers/products/xs15se?variant=3425544068

Just speaking in general terms, with your room size if your looking for more output, you're best suited for 15" options rather than 12". Also given the budget & room size... ported or vented options would the route to consider. You might have to make the upgrade in stages... because based on your room, it might be hard to be happy with just one sub. My space is smaller 1600cu feet & I have dual 15" on the way. You might have to eventually go with dual (or maybe even 3) 15's.

I expect the story to be rather predictable fare, but hopefully much better than the horrible "2012" (with Cusack). Basically getting it for Atmos Ear Candy. My copy should arrive by the weekend. Bugs me that Furious7, Jurassic Park & Ultron didn't get Atmos... but San Andreas does. Oh well.

With my room size, I can go with sealed options & for years I had dual (unmatched) 12" subs in place. When it came time for upgrade considerations, output was not an issue... I was looking for: 1) Matching subs 2) Subs that dug a bit deeper I have to say (at least in my space), once you go dual's... I have no interest in a single sub setup. Right now, I actually have dual SB-2000's & they are nice. But in my space they only clicked one of my boxes: Matching Subs. Everything else was a lateral move, & in my instance not enough difference for a true "upgrade" (especially for the $$$ spent). So, I'm actually sending mine back (after only 30 days). But, if I was starting fresh, or needed to replace a dead or defective sub... the SB-2000 would be an excellent choice.

What area seems to be lacking? Extension or output?

My RB-35's have seamlessly performed surround duty along with my RF-7's & RC-7. When room & placement benefited from direct radiating speakers, they were the perfect solution (over the past 10-12 years I have interchanged them with my RS-7's when desired). They are a pretty versatile speaker, when not employed as surrounds, I've used them as 2ch speakers in my computer room. Great, robust sound for their compact size.... well compact when compared to RF-7's. But when compared to a standard bookshelf speaker, at 19" tall x 9.25" wide x almost 11" deep... and 50lbs for the pair... they are not "compact". In the right room the RB-35's could be used as front L/R mains. If you plan to use RB-35's as surrounds... you would have no problem (if direct radiating effect is the sound you are looking for). I agree with others, you might want to skip the RC-35 & do yourself the favor & look for a RC-7 instead.

Sometimes the best solution.... is the simplest solution. ==================== I started watching the opening chapter of Age of Ultron, & visually the screen was filled with action & energy, with characters & effects coming from all directions. But the audio (compared to what I was actually watching on screen) seemed lacking & anemic. Nothing worse than starting & then stopping a movie, especially during your first viewing. Checked my settings and all was normal, nothing out of place, watching in DTS-HD + Dolby Surround (heights). Switched over to standard DTS-HD MSTR, but still basically the same, no real punch or impressive impact (still seemed soft, not very dynamic). Before I started messing with settings (which are dialed in), I dropped in Pacific Rim & it rocked the room. Oh well. Restarted & finished watch Age of Ultron, & nothing really demo worthy from the audio side. Jumped online & read very similar accounts by many others in regards to the audio (many noted that it seemed compressed, dull, flat & disappointing). I thought it rather sucked. Then stumbled on someone mentioning it might have been authored (intentionally or mistakenly) at lower levels & to bump up the volume 8-to-10db's higher than normal. I went 10+ on volume, re-watched the opening chapter & it was much better. All the channels & LFE were more dynamic & sounded most improved. Anyone else have a similar experience? Gonna have to wait a week or so & watch the whole movie again & see how it works with something a s simple as elevated volume level. The movie itself, meh. (seemed like I've already seen the same elements in a dozen other movies already). Not as fun & entertaining as the first one. Too bad the story, characters & overall plot from this 2nd Avenger effort can't be fixed with a simple turn of the knob.

I agree. The photo is simple & straight forward.... yet equally amazing all at the same time.

56° & perfect with zero humidity. Although, last night rain & clouds prevented viewing of the Draconid meteor shower.

Nope. Not really. It's actually a shot of the nighttime sky...... as seen from Mars. Here's the tiny little speck of light that we all live on. (Seems rather insignificant doesn't it?):

Didn't want to start a new thread for this, but somewhat related to NASA & the same theme. ===================== Here's just your average shot of the nighttime sky... right?

Bummer. Sounds like that was the departure. That hurts. On the plus side... it gives me a good idea on size, fit & how I could transport a pair of LS.

That's awesome !! Love those... where did you get those sleeping bags?

Split window '63.... regulations will not let us see this anytime soon. On the plus side, it just makes this design even more iconic.

Not yet, still about a week or two away.