Jump to content
The Klipsch Audio Community

jazzmessengers

Regulars
  • Content Count

    80
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

31 Excellent

About jazzmessengers

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Location
    New Hampshire, US

Recent Profile Visitors

569 profile views
  1. For single ended Michael R (won't attempt to spell his last name!) has some designs with the Sony VFETs. If you replace the light bulb version with large power resistors that is similar to the SIT-1 schematic. My theory is it is the output transformer that is the limiting factor. The 300B is indeed incredibly linear but then it is has this huge air gapped output transformer coming after it. The amp was running WE 300B, driver was JJ ECC99, interstage transformers were Tango NC20. These days for a "no-compromise" SET or DHT P-P (ala Lynn Olson Karna) I would probably go for transformers from Monolith Magnetics. I am keeping my eyes open for a used SIT-1, unfortunately I don't have as much free time to spend online and these are usually bought up quickly. I may ask Reno hifi to let me know the next time he gets a demo unit. Years ago before I got into DIY I experienced the incredible customer service of Pass Labs with the old Aleph 3.
  2. Yeah I know these are high quality cases. They are actually from Hifi2000 in Italy, and I've bought direct from them before the DIY Audio store existed. After that experience I would much rather order from someone in the US. I was going to go with the 5U deluxe since the 10 mm front panels are incredibly nice. I have them on my 2U case that I use for a headphone amp. I was actually in touch with someone from Thailand that sells FirstWatt clone cases but they are pretty expensive and I don't know what the dissipation rating on the headsinks is. I personally like the look of these more and I was eventually going to buy Pass' commercial SIT-1 amps to use on the midrange/treble horns. I heard those amps back to back with a high end custom built 300B SET amp using nickel output transformers and all of us thought the SIT-1 was more transparent and much better on complex symphony music.
  3. @justinsweber why wouldn't you recommend the DIYAudio store chasis? I was considering one for a build because with their PCBs it would be pre-drilled. I don't have the tools to do that myself and places like FrontPanelExpress charge a decent amount for that.
  4. The VFET FirstWatt amp that was sold as kits via DIY Audio is another incredible sounding amp.
  5. The "SHM" is just some marketing thing that was invented by the Japanese. You specifically want the Platinum series, otherwise the number of regular SHM releases are probably over 1000 and the mastering on these type of discs is more often compressed with the treble boosted. These are just regular reissues with the "super high material" designation applied to them. The very short lived Platinum series were genuinely flat transfers from either US or UK master tapes and verified by the engineers that people have contacted them about (it is also written in the booklets). These were basically created as archives of master tapes (some other labels are digitizing their analog master tapes like Blue Note and Decca) that the Japanese released on CD and SACD. Sorry didn't see this or your message earlier, my practice has been incredibly busy this year and I haven't had much time for message boards.
  6. Here is the thread, but I don't think it will be all that helpful unless you have loads of time http://forums.stevehoffman.tv/threads/platinum-shm-cds-launched.323981/ I say this because the forums there have very low SNR and the actual useful information is in the 5% range. Please feel free to message me if you'd like samples of any of these, I bought them for all the bands I was interested in and compared them to numerous versions (as well as emailed some of the mastering engineers who as usually forthright and happy to talk about their work). Note that if the mixes are unbalanced sounding there is not a whole lot good mastering engineers can do to try and fix them, and the good ones I've spoke to pretty much leave them alone instead of trying to create huge boosts/suckouts in EQ. I avoid remastered CDs as well, particularly those released by the major labels, these are often remastered in a way to sound good in car stereos or low quality headphones.
  7. For popular classic rock (ie Allman Brothers, Cream, Grateful Dead, etc) there are actually many audiophile versions of these albums on CD or SACD (with redbook layer) that are pretty damn close to flat transfers from the master tapes or only have 1-3 db of boost/shelf in some frequencies to massage errors in mixes according to the mastering engineers I've spoke to and they never use compression. There was also a series of CD/SACDs released by Universal Japan several years ago that were purely flat transfers of the master tapes with nothing else done to them, many popular classic rock albums were done in this series, there is a huge thread on the Steve Hoffman forum about them. In the liner notes they included the tape source (some albums have master tapes stored in the US some in the UK), mastering studio and mastering engineer name and a few of them verified that they didn't do anything to them per Universal Japan's wishes. I will have a read through Toole again on reflections, guess I misremembered on when the reflections are happening. With regard to surround, I would say at least 95% or more of the music I like is stereo mix only.
  8. Now this might be a controversial opinion but I think the vast majority of popular music (ie multi tracked rock, pop, etc) needs some help from early reflections to sound "good". Othewise you get a flat, forward image. Where I loved the full Jubilee system I heard was with non-popular music (jazz, classical) that is well recorded where it truly felt like a live like experience from soft/small dynamics (I guess what audiophiles call microdynamics) to full scale dynamics. With this music the recording microphones have already picked up any depth/image cues so this doesn't need to be artificially painted with the speaker/room interaction.
  9. I have just ordered the third edition, the second edition served as a fantastic resource and I've gone back to it many, many times. IMO this is essential reading to anyone that is looking for high fidelity sound. It's also much cheaper than an AES subscription
  10. I haven't considered this, I haven't looked into any K-402 replacement, right now it's basically what I'm "building around". I have a decent amount of space that I can work with, for instance 4 foot depth is quite manageable, I wouldn't really want to go deeper than that.
  11. Primary reason is I am really not a fan of the way they look Second is I've heard the K-402/Jubilee in a rather live sounding room and absolutely loved the way they sounded, so this is a safer choice and I can mess around with diffusion or absorption at the side walls when I get to that point. For now the midbass horn/bass solution is most important.
  12. Well I need to start somewhere, being an MD I don't have any engineering/professional audio background and I think him and Olive's papers/book are a good starting point. One specific area I do agree with him is lateral reflections adding to perceiving better sound. He is a primarily classical listener like myself and in my own experiences with all speakers (controlled directivity and not) these are desirable. And I think evidence from controlled blind listening tests are very important, which he has plenty of data on. No doubt there is still room for plenty of improvement which is why I didn't just go out and buy a pair of Revel Salons The array sealed subs is also interesting. What do you think of PPSL? Cost of drivers/building isn't an issue at all. I am really going for as few compromises as possible. Back to the issue of tapped horn subs, the very small mouths on them for the low frequencies they reproduce has also been something that has bugged me.
  13. For front loaded horns these tend to become enormous (even say ones that load down to 50 Hz) unless you were thinking something like an array of multiple woofers horn loaded so the increased radiating area at the throat allows for a shorter length (ie pictures below if I didn't describe it correctly, I know these are more upper midbass type horns, just using them for illustration)? I have no "as much horn loading as possible" dogma I'm an AES paper/Toole fan just trying to put something together for music use only that is objectively high fidelity.
×
×
  • Create New...