Jump to content

Schu

Heritage Members
  • Posts

    15376
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Posts posted by Schu

  1. why not try it both ways and see which one you like the best... I think, in general, that ESS (32 bit) has the upper hand over Burr-Brown (24 bit), but it's probably a personal choice... I am not really sure at that level if there is a big difference, though there is probably a difference.

    ESS that is newer or higher in the line I would say is a better chipset for sure... but it's still no AKM4499. Topping has a pretty interesting DAC using the AKM4499 and is reasonably priced, but it's still single channel chipset as far as I know.

    • Like 1
  2. On 1/2/2024 at 11:22 AM, Invidiosulus said:

    This is a basic simulation of the LS bass horn in Hornresp.

     

    The K33 is in light gray and I’ve plotted the exact same horn in black but substituted the driver specs for those of the Eminence Kappa 15C.

     

    as you can see, both drivers show a peak in the 150Hz region with the 15C showing less of a drop in output.

    IMG_2158.png.bf014a8ce2bf9044e703055d65ee6c73.png

    You will also note that the 15C gives up a little on the low end to the K33.

     

    Even if the sidewalls aren’t resonating(much) there is still going to be that peak in the response which will really honk if given the right(wrong) source material.


    This peak in the 150Hz region is well documented, and even showed up in the  response curves from the stereophile review of the AL-5.


    Before anybody has a chance to try to pretend that I’m making this up, and that the stereophile measurements aren’t valid(I’m looking at you @OO1 ), I would like to remind you that Roy himself posted the following EQ settings for use with the LS bass section when using an active DSP crossover.

     

    87hz, Q:3.5, +5dB
    148Hz, Q:8, -7dB
    380Hz, Q:5.5, +2dB

     

    I think it’s hard to realize what you are missing until you have a chance to hear the LS bass without that peak.

     

     

    Simulations are WAY MORE important than 'in room response' hooey anyway...

  3. Water Displacement 40... created for the military to use to displace moister on Ballistic Missiles.

     

    it will help kill Oxidation... but not as good as some other products.

    • Thanks 2
  4. This is kind of being set up like a 'trap' of some kind... but I did an extensive listening test a few years ago making an el34 comparison and I could hear a difference in the same circuit.

     

    47124828711_2b6581f0c7_k.jpg

     

    47124827961_46cfb92415_k.jpg

     

    They had some distinct differences that I could discern... but they were more alike than different.

    The 66 and 88 were more potent and had a very forward mid's and the 34 were more laid back and significantly more balanced from top to bottom.

     

    That was about it for me... like most things, none was right and none were wrong. They were different flavors

     

    • Like 2
  5. 12 hours ago, delta88343 said:

    Different horn design have different dispersion characteristics. I believe the exponential design PK used has controlled directives which causes beaming. This beaming effect can significantly increase the amplitudes of various frequencies which can cause a harsh sound in what are considered bright rooms. Remember, speakers are tested in an anechoic chamber that absorbs ALL frequencies and it is in that environment that a speaker produces its fattest frequency response. Now stick that same speaker in a room with large areas of hard surfaces and the sound, especially the mid to higher midrange frequencies are going to continuously reflect and bounce around the room like an echo chamber. This is why a room needs sound absorbing materials, if you're unhappy with the higher frequency sounds.

    I mean, I wish I was learning something here, but I just am not... and I don't think most of the long timers around here with more than a couple thousand posts aren't either... but your effort is appreciated.

×
×
  • Create New...