Jump to content

Grizzog

Regulars
  • Posts

    1073
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Grizzog

  1. 20 hours ago, The Dude said:


    Nice smoke ring. Here are some pics from our rib and chicken turn in last Saturday.
    5b2a12200ca74545bf6a4483fc0259df.jpg

    7426b53525b6862b6e20df2f3e77cab0.jpg

    Can you send some of those over? I'll judge them, free of charge.

    • Like 2
  2. In the case of subwoofers, isn't modulation distortion even less of an issue? When Paul wrote his papers, he was talking about 60hz and 250 or something close to that. Most subwoofers only play to 80hz and in many cases even less than that. 

     

    What is the modulation distortion in a speaker that only plays ~40hz of the audible spectrum? (20-60hz)

     

    As @derrickdj1 stated, the distortions people are mentioning are only at very loud levels. At normal listening levels, well-built modern direct radiator subs should be virtually distortion free. Horn-loading will always be better, but in a normal listening room, large direct radiating subs can do the job. I think it is important not to outright dismiss a certain sub just because of bias. There are good and bad speakers of every category. Perhaps it is also important to note that Klipsch only makes a couple horn-loaded subs in the pro line that are absolutely huge. Even there, direct radiators are more prevalent. 

  3. I've heard a difference with break-in.

     

    On speakers, I guess it's a question of whether the speaker broke in or I was getting used to it - either way, there was a perceptible change.

     

    As far as subwoofers, definitely. When new, I would have the gain on my subs much higher than after they had broken in. Daily I would slowly bring down the volume and still have the same impact.

    • Like 1
  4. OK, since no one else has, I'll bring up The Sixes.

     

    I'm excited for these and think they'll make a great tabletop/desk setup. I actually preordered a pair for my computer setup. From the pictures, they look great and different from most speakers you see if this size/type.

     

    @Jainbaby I had a few questions if you're able to answer them.

    Is the horn the same as used on the RP-160M? Looks to be a different phase plug, but utilizing the horn and titanium diaphragm.

    Is the woofer the same as used in the R-26F, but not copper?

    How long will the cable be to connect the two speakers?

  5. That's difficult to say. Since prices were already shown at CES, a significant increase may be a tough sell. At $3k, the fifteens sound like they are in a sweet spot. At $4k (just a guess) then you've got to think a bit harder. $3k and made in USA would be awesome. $3,500 I'd say is still good. But at that price it is right next to the forte and close to the Cornwall.

     

    I guess it is a question of how much more...


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    • Like 1
  6. I really don't see the issue with @Jainbaby's comments about tone and speed. These make perfect sense. Is it an issue with terminology?

     

    For those of us with Heritage/extended heritage speakers, we know full well the benefits of a large low-mass cone.

     

    The Altec 19 uses a very low-mass cone crossed at 1200hz and is absolutely fantastic.

     

    PWK said the midrange is where we live. Sounds to me this is what The Fifteens are aiming for - they don't need to plumb the depths of the earth or reach past the upper limits of hearing. Tone is getting at the important pieces of the music and making it sound real. 

     

    I, for one, am extremely excited for The Fifteens and the Forte III. The Forte brings back the original spirit/sound of Klipsch, and The Fifteens go for that as well as bringing the old world charm with today's tech. 

     

    Count me as one that is extremely pleased with the direction of multiple portions of Klipsch. 

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...