Jump to content

How do you know if you need an amp?


mharper3

Recommended Posts

Cons:
With an "All-in-One unit, you only have one power supply to provide power to the Processor and to each Channel of the Amp. Driven hard, the amp can "run out of gas" and begin clipping and distorting.

Also keep in mind that not all AVRs are created the same and THX Ultra II AVRs are rated to drive speakers that have impedance dips down to 3.2 Ohms in a multi speaker configuration and this does help the RF-7 based HT. {EDIT: Oops...I said this on page one. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have to disagree with the "lots more money" comment. Going with the Emotiva amps and processor is only slightly more than the popular price points on upper end receivers. And if you consider that in ten years you may replace only the processor, you could argue that it was a less expensive long term solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

I'd have to disagree with the "lots more money" comment. Going with the Emotiva amps and processor is only slightly more than the popular price points on upper end receivers.

I have edited my statement above. Emotiva's Pre/Pro is the exception to the rule...but it is also buggy (at least the last time I checked). I was referring to the "overall" picture that going full separates is much more expensive than using a receiver as a pre/pro. Buying a $600 Denon or Onkyo vs. buying a $2000 or higher (Sunfire, Krell or Arcam etc). Yes, you can get a new UMC-1 for slightly more than an average receiver but that generally is not the same for most other brands. It would be a very significant jump in price to go with a dedicated Pre/Pro.

Hope that clarifies my previous statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

using a higher end A/V receiver as a pre-pro matched with an amp of your choice is the cheaper way to go

I am using my Yamaha RXV2095 as the pre-pro and an Anthem AVM50 for the amp

at the time, the 2095 was a top rated A/V receiver

a very noticable improvement and recommend this type of set up

now if you have a lower end A/V receiver then it probably is not worth the trouble

looked at a few pre-pro only and they are an expensive route to go and probably would not notice a difference anyways

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Youthman, I'll agree that the UMC-1 is the exception and buggy. I went with the XPA5 and the Integra 40.1 (which is not buggy). Total investment of $1600. Future investment of $1k on a processor. So over the lifetime of two processors a total investment of $2600. Now, assume you buy a $1200 receiver (which many, many do). And you do that twice in the same time period. Now you're comparing $2600 to $2400. The extra $200 seems a no brainer for the extra perfomance for all those years. And who knows, you may actually get three or four generations of use out of the amp?

Granted, I may have skewed the numbers slightly for my arguement. :) I do that. But you get the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...