fini Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Michael, Good for you, seeing a therapist. AND for being honest here about your situation. I've got some of that compulsive behavior as well. Maybe we can get shrunk together. Let me know if she's cute, and I'll fly out... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Button Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Michael, I can't tell if you're serious or not, but one thing is for sure. You could really do well by selling a lot of that stuff you've got and stick with Home Audio and Klipsch. This really is madness. Get your Klipsch stuff in order one pair at a time. You might wanna get at least one pair veneered or something, then move over to another pair and so on. Good grief, get busy dude. T Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkp Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Michael, I put my post into a PM. If you want to post it, feel free.. David Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colterphoto1 Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 Michael, I can't tell if you're serious or not, but one thing is for sure. You could really do well by selling a lot of that stuff you've got and stick with Home Audio and Klipsch. This really is madness. Get your Klipsch stuff in order one pair at a time. You might wanna get at least one pair veneered or something, then move over to another pair and so on. Good grief, get busy dude. T Todd, For some reason, I thought I'd do reveneering this winter. Guess what- it's COLD in that garage. I might swap out the CW's so I can strip down the ones I'll be reveneering next spring. That sort of thing. Just can't get the putty, paint or sander out yet. Yes the stuff takes up an enormous amount of room in the house. But I sold my first pair of Klispch today. THose KG2's I just bought are going to a college student. So that's a step in the right direction. I really do enjoy swapping them out a lot, but guess after the initial fascination wears off, the KG4 really isn't much of a match to the CW's and I don't know why on earth I've got this PA here. Got to get rid of all the old EV cabinets taking up space, or start a band! Thanks for your kind words, this really is a struggle. Michael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg928gts Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Michael, I'm finding myself doing the same thing. I'm putting together the MCCM system just for the heck of it. The other day I purchased a Behringer 31 band digital eq and a 3-way stereo crossover, and I'm thinking about a mixing board, mics, and wiring. It's crazy, in a way, I guess, but I think I know why I'm doing it. I always wanted a MCCM system but couldn't afford it back when the prices were sky high for this stuff. Now it's all cheap and available. The Behringer electronics are great pieces for the money, too bad they weren't around back when I was gigging. I miss being out with the band and mixing live sound. I used to dream about putting systems together. I would draw pictures and diagrams of how I'd put everything together. I managed to put together a few nice systems over the years, but never got the whole MCCM system. So now I'm doing it. I don't have any idea what I'll do with it long term. Short term I'll enjoy the process of assembling everything, wiring it all up, adjusting everything, and listening to some music on it. Who knows what will become of it, but I'm enjoying it now. I hope you find enjoyment with your pursuits as well. Greg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colterphoto1 Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 Thanks Greg, Maybe some of it is just that it's cold and nasty out. I can't wait to get this stuff hooked up and outside and blow the dust off some cones! Maybe I can get with Who next summer and do some mixing of bands in Chicago. I really miss the action of working on stage. There is something magical about being a mix engineer, like being an orchestra conductor really. Besides, with my mane of hair and recent bulk, I make one heck of a stage manager! Michael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev313 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Enjoying it is one thing. Buying things because you can't stop yourself is quite another. Way to take a stand on this problem. My advice (which I will be following myself, BTW) is to make 1 or 2, maybe 3, complete systems out of your collection and sell the rest. Correct me if I am wrong, but from your signature you have EIGHTEEN pairs of speakers plus one Cornwall center? Who cares if it sells Klipsch? Don't let this forum give a false "mystique" to these speakers. It is great hi-fi gear to be sure, but not exactly the best investment from a collectible standpoint. If it is not being used, sell it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhendrix Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 I feel your pain, Michael! I have two KG-based HT's, an all-Heresy HT, an all-Cornwall HT, a Chorus/Forte HT, and K's, Corns, and LaScala's in another AND I still find myself constantly on ebay, audiogon, and craiglist looking for the next great deal. This doesn't count the various parts I've accumulated to build CornScala's. You have inspired me to do some house cleaning . . . May the force be with you . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnyholiday Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 For the control booth , to mix down16 channels to a DAW for recording,guitar &bass amp modeling,mic modeling, insert effects,rhythm tracks, mix down, an mastering effects, CurlyColterLoopsFactory, get that DR Who dude to figure out the DAW, it will drive em Krazy W3rd I've never been fond of the "studio in a box"....it's like buying a HTIB. Same quality and same flexibility (more like lack thereof) Now something like the Mackie Onyx 1640 would be a blast, because it doubles up as a live console AND a recording console at the same time. 16 channels would be the bare minimum for mixing, but they can be diasy chained for a total of 32 channels [H] Their new live "large format" Onyx live consoles look cool too, but I don't think they have the firewire capability. It's good to see mackie has finally put two sweepable mids into their EQ section instead of the old school single one. There is no linkage between a DAW an a HTIB, an a DAW an a channel mixer are two different beasts, the DAW used in the example was in the price point of Colters Mackie mixer,go into the price range of a Mackie Onyx, might as well get a Korg 3200, get 16 channels,40 gig hard drive,REMS modeling~Resonant structure an Electronic circuit Modeling System-ala Phil Moog,cd-r/rw,locate points,mark points,track editing,song editing,midi functionality,scene memories,S/p DIF input/output,USB connectivity,reverb-type,spring, room,wet plate/dry plate ....,stereo/cross delay,stereo multi tap delay.......,modulation-type chorus, flanger,phaser,wah,stereo auto pan.....,dynamics-type effects,compressor,limiter,stereo gate,enhancer,stereo decimator,stereo pitch shifter,stereo ring modulator......,deesser,,ampsim,cabsim,cabinetresonator,micsim,PCM rhythm tracks ,yada yada yada, both units shown have all of the above an more ,an a mixer just mixes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colterphoto1 Posted December 9, 2005 Author Share Posted December 9, 2005 you mean I coulda had one of those? Maybe that's why so many guys are selling their 1604's? But I'm no muscian, just a live sound guy, so the Mackie is probably right for me? Somebody better take control of my bank account before I make some more bad decisions....... M Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke Spinner Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 Somebody better take control of my bank account before I make some more bad decisions....... Cool ..! Send yer checkbook to Me ...... of course, I'll approve All purchases, anyways, Colt ....[] Seriously, tho ..... You, 'n Who oughta do some S.R. ....... at his age he's got ton's of connections to what's happening and where .... and You ..... would Enjoy the hell out of it.............[] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWho Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 There is no linkage between a DAW an a HTIB, an a DAW an a channel mixer are two different beasts, the DAW used in the example was in the price point of Colters Mackie mixer,go into the price range of a Mackie Onyx, might as well get a Korg 3200, get 16 channels,40 gig hard drive,REMS modeling~Resonant structure an Electronic circuit Modeling System-ala Phil Moog,cd-r/rw,locate points,mark points,track editing,song editing,midi functionality,scene memories,S/p DIF input/output,USB connectivity,reverb-type,spring, room,wet plate/dry plate ....,stereo/cross delay,stereo multi tap delay.......,modulation-type chorus, flanger,phaser,wah,stereo auto pan.....,dynamics-type effects,compressor,limiter,stereo gate,enhancer,stereo decimator,stereo pitch shifter,stereo ring modulator......,deesser,,ampsim,cabsim,cabinetresonator,micsim,PCM rhythm tracks ,yada yada yada, both units shown have all of the above an more ,an a mixer just mixes It's still a "studio in a box." I was merely trying to draw an analogy to HTIB in that they both have all the "features" one might want for the given application, but the box versions are certainly more concerned with the quantity than the quality. Also, a DAW is completely the wrong tool for a live sound reinforcement application. Not enough aux sends, no submasters, and you'll never need to use any of the built-in effects. (I would argue that a DAW is the wrong tool for a studio too, but let's not go there). The only reason I mentioned the onyx is because it is fist and foremost a FOH mixer with a great EQ section and lots of aux sends. However, a lot of bands wanna know how their show sounded and/or produce a live CD, so the ability to record every channel on the mixer independantly of the FOH makes such a task very easy and allows for very high fidelity. Correct me if I'm wrong, but all those DAWs are post EQ and post fader which means changes to FOH will result in changes on the recording too. But it sounds like Colter isn't even interested in recording the bands so going with the VLZ is certainly a worthy approach. Why pay for a tool that he'll never use? I find their EQ sections a bit limiting and the noise floor a bit high, but they are very reliable and get the job done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnyholiday Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colterphoto1 Posted December 9, 2005 Author Share Posted December 9, 2005 no, really, go ahead johnyholiday. I likes da way you talk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnyholiday Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 Wrong mixing board monkey, read the pdf manual an you tell me,lets get on the same page ,i merely suggest an option\addition to Colters new toy,this is the last studio Johny'Holiday was last in, an yes it is in Weed Ca,with a newer band called Mynis, Sylvia Massy Shivy&Greg Shivy co owners, ~ radiostarstudios.com ~, if one is touchy about nose floors an final scrub, mix downs ......of live shows that is how you do it, bring the band to the theater, with the studio built in, with isolation booths built under the stage,an forget setting up a FOH board an having 40% of the sound ruined by an acoustically unfriendly venue,check out her discography,gear,studios ,an Sophie B. Hawkins phone message...,PS not aware of your expertise can you elaborate IE. instruments played,equipment used,venues,touring .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWho Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 I think most of my favorite recordings were actually of live concerts...Colter has a whole slew of them. The Roxy Music is the first to come to mind though - one of thee best recordings I have ever heard (and I know quite a few people that feel the same way too). If you're talking strictly about recording then I don't see why it was brought up when Colter was mentioning that all he needs is a mixer and then he would have a full blown PA rig. It's like telling someone in the market for a toothbrush that they need to purchase a comb...or am I completely missing something here? I refuse to comment on my expertise because it really has nothing to do with the gear in question nor their intended implementation. There is no need to get emotional about gear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnyholiday Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 Just because I have two double stacks of LSI's, Renkus Heinz stage monitors, dual 31 band Rane EQ, Ashley stereo 3-way xover, Assorted compressors and delays, Shure and AKG mics, Crown, QSC, and BGW amps- WHY did I just purchase a Mackie 1604 VLZ Pro mixing console? I really have just about no use for any of this stuff. I'm not in a band, I don't work for a band, I have no gigs, I hardly play an instrument and no one would pay me to sing. So what's up? Michael He already has a mixer,the DAW was mentioned as an add on for production purposes in the digital domain,pre an post,live or studio ,unless he wants to go buy hundreds more stomp boxes, amps ,mics, beat boxes,DATS,reverb tanks......your the one that needed another Mackie with16 more inputs , a tooth bush an comb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colterphoto1 Posted December 9, 2005 Author Share Posted December 9, 2005 johnyholiday is cool saying that a digital recorder would be cool if I was recording but the newly purchased 1604 mixer will be just fine and fun for some live stuff and 'band' rehersals even though there is no band yet. Thanks for the info, but what is DAW standing for? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnyholiday Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 Digital Audio Workstation=DAW ,an as far as emotion, the thread was started because of Colter's emotion's over his gear, Johny'Holiday who always speaks in the third person ,has no emotion to the equivocations of this forum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWho Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 I'm the one that would prefer to use a computer for recording where I can have access to thousands of free VST plugins and have all the flexibility in the world. Just throw a cheap laptop in the rack and record onto an external harddrive (then just move the harddrive to the fancy computer at home for mix down). Why not go with a board that kills two birds with one stone (which implies getting rid of the 1604). But he doesn't wanna record so it's a mute issue anyway [] Anyways, the music scene is pretty buzzing around here on campus (a bit slower cuz it's winter now), but if you wanted to do some mixing around here I'm sure something could be arranged. [] I'm constantly surrounded by all the same crappy JBL systems and it would be such a blast to produce some real sound. Ya know...you have four 18" woofers to your disposal too. Build two more cabinets for those EV's and you could fill in that bottom octave with ease. Since I'm thinking about it, what's the specific model numbers on those EV drivers? I wrote it down, but lost the slip of paper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.