Jump to content

Analog Does Not Exist


artto

Recommended Posts

Formula aside you are right. Who is recording in analog anymore?

Thanx, Russ

P.S. Ten to the minus 44? My slide rule doesn't go out that far!

Ah, but the real question is did anyone ever really record anything in "analog" !?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Unibomber was good at math too.

The Unibomber has nothing to do with analog (recording) (at least as far as I know)

next guess

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I'm concerned digital is a subset of analog, which is to say that digital is analog.

Nope. Actually what I'm saying is that "analog" (literally) does not exist. One is not a subset of the other or vice versa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RockOnKlipsch ~ sort of ~ picked up on the idea. He at least recogonized the equation and probably knows who Max Plack is. But he took the whole idea in the wrong direction by the question he posed, so I had to answer No.

Actually, the toilet paper example sort of hints at the answer (the "idea"). [;)]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...