Jump to content

Make Cornwall bass bin


Colin

Recommended Posts

Good question Colin - my first inclination would be to use a JBL bass bin - The plans are readily available and I think it is a good match for the rest of the the cornwall horns. My current building project is a JBL bin with the horns mounted on top in a separate surround.

I like the sound of the JBL and find it at least comparable. The bin also frees up the creativity in design of the overall speaker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a rather mediocre looking 10 incher, 2 inch voice coil, reasonably sized magnet I suppose.

But in a 3 foot internal volume cabinet ported to around 36 Hz with a low watt tube amp they can boogie.

They have have a real nice lower midbass and midrange tone to them, to me anyways...

They can get down low as well.

They work well in a two-way kind of set-up, with a helper tweeter.

It's a bastard speaker for sure.....

post-6643-13819259401962_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey Bob,

Thanks for the input. The reason I asked is because I have invisioned such a project as the Cornscala. I've seen your posts.

Question, Is there a way to keep the same cubic volume of the bass bin but make it taller and skinnier? I would like to have a speaker taller than the cornwall or the scala and make the width just about the width of the mid on the scala. Would that change the "tuning" of the 15" woofer to be unsatisfactory or would there need to be a crossover change?

jc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

----------------

On 11/30/2004 9:41:31 AM jwcullison wrote:

Hey Bob,

Thanks for the input. The reason I asked is because I have invisioned such a project as the Cornscala. I've seen your posts.

Question, Is there a way to keep the same cubic volume of the bass bin but make it taller and skinnier? I would like to have a speaker taller than the cornwall or the scala and make the width just about the width of the mid on the scala. Would that change the "tuning" of the 15" woofer to be unsatisfactory or would there need to be a crossover change?

jc

----------------

jc,

The volume of the box and the area of the ports are important to keep the Bass output at about the same as a Cornwall. The width of the motor board could decrease by a couple of inches and still accomodate the width of the K-401. The depth is really dictated by the length of the K-401 horn and its driver. That is about 24 inches when it is mounted on the back of a 3/4 inch motor board. Of course the bass bin could be less than that depth, but the horn would still place the front of the cabinet 24 inches from a wall.

Bob Crites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly

Yes the Mid horn will dictate the minimum width and depth. I'm not concerned about the depth. If it had to be deeper than the mid horn, thats , ok.

I will try and send you a diagram of such a cabinet that I have in mind. I will try to keep the cabinet's internal volume for the bass bin the same. Please don't laugh, it might be crude.

Again, tell me what the internal volume of the bass bin is?

jc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JC,

Just doing some reading and saw your post. I've got some experience with cabinet design and would offer this to you. The ratio of the sides of the Mighty Cornwall cabinet as engineered by Klipsch is (okay externally, but ratios are still similar)

35.75:25.5:15.5 inches, which equates to

1:.71:.43

please note that none of these dimensions is similar and the ratios are not halves or quarters. They seem to be very random numbers that have nothing to do with one another. Good. It's the same basic principle as the dimensions of the listening room. One would not design a HT room that was 16x16x8 feet. Reason, it causes an extreme build up of standing waves, or the emphasis of some frequencies over others. Try to keep this in mind when designing your cabinets.

So long as you keep the overall INTERIOR volume close to the same as your original Cornwall, the PORT VOLUME (take into account the shelf, which gives the port depth) should also be identical. This would greatly simplify your cabinet building if you can manage it. Otherwise, if you change the cabinet volume by a significant amount (I dunno, maybe 5-10%) you would have to recalculate the port volume. Also remember to add the dampening material to one of each pair of parallel cabinet walls, generally top, back, and one side. This also helps break of standing waves.

I'm sure there are other more advanced speaker builders out there and numerous books on the subject. Just wanted you to get thinking correctly about cabinets before you let aesthtics rule entirely. There are sound (pun intended) acoustical principles that must be applied.

Hope this helps- didn't mean to confuse.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok JC,

I was feeling a bit adventerous, perhaps the spirit of Bob Crites or William McDermott was at play here, but I did some preliminary calculations for you. THESE ARE ROUGH.

Based on your wants list, this may be a pretty bizarre cabinet indeed. Starting with Cornwalls' stated exterior measurements, stated above, and subtracting 1.5 inches each dimension for thickness of two walls, interior volume is approx 80 in3. (note to experts, since components are roughly the same in both instances, I am not subtracting the volume for 15" cone and mid horn, nor for the port volume)in order to simplify these rough calculations.

#1 In order to avoid redesigning the port volume, a cabinet could be (these are rough exterior dimensions) 38 height, 24 deep (for K400) and would therefore be only 16 wide to end up with roughly 82 in3 interior volume. This would be a little goofy looking, the depth would be exactly 1.5 x the width (not a good thing) and the woofer would barely mount on the motor board, to say nothing of the K400 minimum width (help out here Bob)The face of this cabinet would be like a Chorus II slimmer by 1/5 inches but twice as deep. Kinda odd.

#2 Here is what might be possible...again outside dimensions. 31high, 19 wide, 24 deep. You could build a riser for the optimum listening height. The ratios work out well 1:.61:.77 and the components would fit better. This would give about 80.5in3 interior volume, same as original Cornwall. Only 4" shorter than LaScala, just as deep and a little narrower. I've not drawn it up to see what it would look like.

#3 So... If #1 or #2 don't appeal, since the criterior for squeezing these components into a single box the same volume as Cornwall, but taller cannot be met, a re-engineering of the port volume would be in order. Not terribly complex, but I cant do it without woofer values and charts. Not off the top of my head anyway.

Again, it's a fun little game, hope to not mislead or confuse.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The internal volume of a real Cornwall (vertical) that I have is a bit less than 6 cubic feet. Some of this volume is occupied by the 3 drivers and the shelf. That amount would have to be subtracted to get down to real air volume which is what is important when considering performance of the bass driver.

Bob Crites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This CornScala has got great possibilities to be good looking as well as good sounding. The length of the K400 at 24 inches is pretty deep and designing around it is a challenge.

Does anyone know the dimensions of the Belle midhorn? Is it the K500 or K530? What is the depth with driver? What is the width of the horn flare at the front?

Also, does the AB crossover cross at 500hz?

I'm assuming that crossing the K55 at 400hz requuires the K400 in order to hear it. I wonder how far the K500 could be pushed below it's rating to be more cabinet friendly and sound better, too.

One more odd question. I've been trying to imagine somehow sealing the rear end of a K400 and K55 sticking through the back of a cornwall cab. It would certainly look strange, from the back, but haven't been able to think of anything that would work anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oops, my bad Bob,

hxwxd=vol in in3 that/12/12/12 is ft3, I fergot the last /12

so Corn is approx 6.6 interior (again NOT taking out for driver vol or port vol)

#1 example is 6.9

#2 example is 6.7

so those are close to original cabinet.

I'll approximate another one using the K501 Belle horn, It'll probably give a nice appearing, taller cabinet if we don't have to go so deep.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, how bout the BelleCorn

It's 35 tall (same as LS, .75 shorter than Cornwall)

it's 21.5 wide ( 2 narrower than LS, 4 narrower than Corn)

it's 19 deep (same as Belle, same as LS, 3.5 deeper than Corn.

ratios work out to 1:.61:.54 with w:d- 1:1.31, so looks pretty good in not assisting any standing wave nodes. At 6.78 ft3 interior approx, its within 2% based on my rough calculation, so port volume would be about same as standard Cornwall.

Hey People, THIS COULD WORK and could also be the answer for those of us wanting to build our own Vertical Cornwall for Center HT use!!wwwoooohhhoooo

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...