Chad

Thanks for the heads up. We have a synonym-based search system in place that look for common variations/misspellings of actual product names (in this case the actual product names are rb-5 and rb-5 II), but we didn't have "rb5" and "rb5II" put in as synonyms for those 2 products. They are in there now, so they come up in search.

For more info: https://community.klipsch.com/index.php?/topic/146184-forum-faq/

@@Chad, make yourself useful! Totally at the top of my priority list*: 100 new emoticons. * not really.

Correct. By definition, they are not mutually exclusive. However, it is still open to interpretation. Here's a relevant article on TechCrunch. It's more about Facebook's policies (which I find questionable in about every regard), but makes mention of such a "grey area". http://techcrunch.com/2012/12/28/theres-a-difference-between-private-and-personal/ The bottom line here is that Klipsch isn't gonna read your PMs, nor do we want to. Perhaps an exception would be for legal reasons, but I'm no lawyer.

One other important thing to note here is the PM system here is not called "Private Messaging". It's called "Personal Messaging". There is a distinction there.

WHAT??????? How the? WHAT???? HOW? WHY? WHAT?

The only way a moderator or admin can read anyone else's PMs is if a PM gets reported via the "report" button. That's it*. The ONLY other way to see PM content would be through direct access to the database, to which I am currently the only one in the company with access. I've been trusted with keeping the data, so you can trust that I'm not digging through the database tables reading people's PMs. Who has time for that? That said, no PM system is truly private - but we do our best to make it as private as we can. We have no reason to be digging around in there. Why would we? * edit: unless an admin were to log in as a member, which is possible with this system. The only Admins are Amy and I, and we don't have a reason to ever do this, except to test member group permission settings, which is the primary reason for that function existing.

Fair enough!

I get it. But it's a link to a gallery, not a sub-forum. Therefore it needs to stand out in some way, and it does in a way that tells you what it is. (stack of photographs). It's where it is because it fits under the "Home Theater" subforum, topically (for lack of a better term.)

Like the home theater showcase. oh really? If many people feel that way I can remove it. I put it in as a way to see latest pics people have uploaded to brag about their setups, I don't see what is "extra thumb" about that. Seems to me it's an "added feature".

i feel the same. dont like to clean my speakers every hour or so. but some love the gloss black! Just keep playing them loud and the dust won't be able to settle on them!

Not yet. I'm not able to duplicate the issue.

This is all true, minus the "8 hours" part. it's more like 22 hours. And the "closet" is actually the anechoic chamber.

I've seen a prototype of in-ear La Scalas but the testing subject left quite a mess (not unlike that guy at the beginning of the movie "Scanners")

Also, bluetooth wireless mini khorns in 2015 Shhh.... don't tell anyone.

A whole line of mini-jubillees, all bluetooth-ready and wireless. That's coming in 2014. you can quote me on that. <---- programmer who has the inside dirt on product releases..

Man... I wish I had $3K laying around. That is a steal.

Report that to your email provider as a phishing scam attempt.

In case you haven't heard, there was a major security vulnerability discovered and reported on today that has affected thousands of websites, potentially exposing those sites' user's personal info. This particular vulnerability is nasty due to its untraceable nature - we can't know if users' info was stolen - so it should be assumed that sometime in the past two years, members of those sites were affected. To be clear: Klipsch.com, community.klipsch.com, checkout.klipsch.com, etc., are NOT affected by this vulnerability (due to the fact that we do not use OpenSSL on our web servers), however if you have an account at any of the sites listed here: https://github.com/musalbas/heartbleed-masstest/blob/master/top10000.txt and that site is now coming up negative (meaning they have now patched their site(s)) at the handy checker here: http://filippo.io/Heartbleed/, you SHOULD change your password and also look into if that site offers two-factor authentication for extra measure. Much more info here: (technical) http://heartbleed.com and here: (less-techie) http://gizmodo.com/heartbleed-why-the-internets-gaping-security-hole-is-1560812671 Update: found a good article on what to do/not to do to protect yourself from this vulnerability: http://www.cnet.com/news/how-to-protect-yourself-from-the-heartbleed-bug/ Notable sites affected: yahoo.com and all yahoo properties such as mail, flickr, tumblr, and more...

IE Which version of IE?

fully aware.

That member has been banned. Please continue to be vigilant against spammers and notify us of such activity. Thanks

If it's a quoted reply, it could be due to poor formatting on the quoted post. I'll look into it.

Thanks, but I had nothing to do with that site ;-)