Schu

nice

got a pair of these used for a fair price... give them a try and see if I like them

Bwahahaha... to true... to true

Ceramic grinding mechanism? I think the surface face is still solid stainless

you know rick... you can post all those in one single posting []

one handed milled salt and pepper mills. these things are made so well, I may never need another SP shaker

Godspeed ES... you WILL be missed!

Flipping Nice!

between the II's and III's? for me it is that the III's are slightly more focused, whether this is due to age or anything is anyones guess.

I finally found the video I had been looking for about klipsch efficiency...

Ahhhh... very nice. congratulations!

how much for the LSII's?

I use autocad, if I extrapolate a given "angle" over a distance, the variance grows. I prefer to measure all my angles, compound or otherwise... it's much more accurate. like this OP: a=0(anchor point) b=x c=y you measure the distance to B from 0, then you measure the distance to C from 0 then you measure the distance between B and C and that gives you an EXACT angle that is repeatable with great accuracy. this can be done anywhere along the X/Y axis, though it is always more accurate to measure as far away from 0 as possible to avoid multiplying an error. if X/Y are not level/square in both directions, then you need to also add those measurements of offset from level/square to your work. For me, the expression "angle" is nothing more than the sum of these measurements stated above... better to use that sum than some other form of expression (angle) if accuracy is the goal. FWIW... I digitize to the ten-thousandths... certainly much more critical than some bulbous building or structure. But do what you want.

great choice here... you'll love the p5 once it's set up.

my two channel can tell the difference.

CAD's notoriously in accurate for angle dimensions because it rounds it up or down. the most accurate way to measure is to measure the x and y axis in relation to 0 as described above.

you need to know the actual angle in degrees or can you live with messurements? If you can live with messaurements, just meassure each line at three fixed points, where the lines intersect being 0. then messure a fixed distance from 0 on axis x and another fixed distance from 0 for Y(there is no Z axis), then you can messure a triangulated line that connects X and Y. to double check, also messure the offset off of either (or both) X and Y at an exact 90°

A Clockwork Orange... soundtrack compossed by Walter/Wendy Carlos... the same person!

that's okay, you can fix that hog with this: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I got a couple handfuls of these six packs!

I tried to start a "What did I buy today" thread months ago... let's try this again Le Noise on LP came in today

I can get a whole Empire Turntable WITH ARM for about half that price.

isn't there already a loudness thread?

Happy St. Pattys... I've already cooked two briskets this week!

I do like indeed!

I've used that technique to rescue myself from the side of the road with a blown fuse in my motorcycle. worked like a charm