Jump to content

Greatest revelations and misconceptions in Audio


Recommended Posts

Revelations

=========

-I love music from an early age on my parents Motorla tube HIFI in the 1960s and 70s. It has been found once again in the 2000s with tubes.

-Multi channel music set up is a pain in the butt.

-I love a good DAC and power filtering!

-CDs should have been higher resolution than 16 /44 when they hit the market.

Misconceptions

============

- Record cleaning machines are a waste of money.

- Speaker wire makes a difference.

- I am going to really like this surround sound thing for music.

- I did not understand digital listener fatigue was making me listen to music less than LPs ( in the 70s and early 80s) until 2000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

Revelations

It does not take alot of money to have great sounding speakers, and system.

Having a place to ask questions to a large group of people who have more experience than me about this hobby is priceless !

Misconceptions

Well known brand names will usually be a safe bet when picking out speakers or anything audio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Revelations:

* Multi-channel is more trouble than what it's worth.

* CD sound quality really has improved during the last few years.

* Diana Krall has great legs.

Misconceptions:

* Elvis Costello has great legs.

* High priced audio cable sounds better.

* Audio component of the year awards actually mean something.

* Bose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Revelations:

"Stereo" is just dual channel mono and requires as much effort to recreate a musical space-time event as it does for my cat to make sense out of television pictures.

I know of only one successful multi-channel release ("Music for Compline" SACD from Harmonia).

Every year there are fewer people that have ever heard a fine music system.

The last iteration of cassettes remain capable of matching all but the very pinnacle of media.

Misconceptions:

Fine system=empty wallet.

That there is a connection between the medium or format and the listening experience when all things are equal.

Using RIAA on LP's is fine, but restoring dynamic range is "processing" and no real audiophile would do it.

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Revelations:

"Stereo" is just dual channel mono and requires as much effort to recreate a musical space-time event as it does for my cat to make sense out of television pictures.

I know of only one successful multi-channel release ("Music for Compline" SACD from Harmonia).

Every year there are fewer people that have ever heard a fine music system.

The last iteration of cassettes remain capable of matching all but the very pinnacle of media.

Misconceptions:

Fine system=empty wallet.

That there is a connection between the medium or format and the listening experience when all things are equal.

Using RIAA on LP's is fine, but restoring dynamic range is "processing" and no real audiophile would do it.

Dave

I had an AIWA and Denon casseete decksin the early 80s. They sounded darn good as I recall!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More:

Revelation:

* Old rockers never die. They just get better...

* Klipsch horn speakers really do benefit from high quality amplifiers.

* Some Jazz stuff sounds pretty good.

* Many audiophiles lack a sense of humor.

Misconception:

* The long lost Parrot has no sense of humor.

* That I will find an audio system that I will be happy to keep forever...

* Cheap Chinese tube amps will last forever.

* Cheap Chinese tube amps sound good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flynn, that revelation came through the acquisition of a cassette deck for CHEEP mainly to digitize some family keepsakes. The deck is a pretty high end Yamaha with auto tape and NR set, reverse, the works. 59.00 in NM condition.

It had been YEARS since I'd listened to a cassette and my thoughts about them were to almost classify them like 8 track. When I dropped in a metal cassette I'd made with Dolby C and DBX decompression of a reel to reel release of "Revolver," I was totally floored by the sound. I have never heard a better Revolver in any medium. Same for a copy I'd made of Allan Parsons "Tales of Mystery and Imagination" from an LP. Unbelievable.

It's certainly a medium with no application anymore, and it never really got a lot of respect living in the shadow of reel to reel, but in it's last days of metal tape and Dolby C, along with finely crafted decks it really did the trick. I am half tempted to haunt Ebay for some of the high end commercial releases on metal tape...but I really don't need more antiques!

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flynn, that revelation came through the acquisition of a cassette deck for CHEEP mainly to digitize some family keepsakes. The deck is a pretty high end Yamaha with auto tape and NR set, reverse, the works. 59.00 in NM condition.

It had been YEARS since I'd listened to a cassette and my thoughts about them were to almost classify them like 8 track. When I dropped in a metal cassette I'd made with Dolby C and DBX decompression of a reel to reel release of "Revolver," I was totally floored by the sound. I have never heard a better Revolver in any medium. Same for a copy I'd made of Allan Parsons "Tales of Mystery and Imagination" from an LP. Unbelievable.

It's certainly a medium with no application anymore, and it never really got a lot of respect living in the shadow of reel to reel, but in it's last days of metal tape and Dolby C, along with finely crafted decks it really did the trick. I am half tempted to haunt Ebay for some of the high end commercial releases on metal tape...but I really don't need more antiques!

Dave

True I do not want to have a couple of closets full of SS antique stuff i will only give to the kids or jettison on downsizing ten years from now.

The shallow marketing types killed cassette long before CD had a HIFI quality resolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Revelations

- DIY audio is alive and well. No better way to appreciate how something works than by building it.

- The quest for audio nervana is attained through the quest it's self, not the journey's end.

- I'm drawn to the utter simplicity of valve audio, a more direct link between me and the musical artist.

Misconceptions

- All solid state amplifiers sound the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Newbie chiming in here!

Revelations:

FLAC music files with Auzentech sound card & the X-Fi Crystalizer is a great sounding source. Not as good as LPs but better than CD imo.

Listening to punk records recorded at high levels is a blast on a low power tube amp.

Klipsch KLF-20's are living beings!

Everything sounds better when you're at someone else's house.

You can have a superb system with a little research and little money.

Misconceptions

Expensive cables sound better than cheap ones. Expensive cable can't sound worse than cheap ones.

Audiophile equipment always sounds better than the junk at Best Buy.

Audiophiles know that they're talkinga about. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Revelations

Proper speaker set-up makes the biggest improvement

Speakers are the only bargain in audio

Large, used speakers are not only cheaper, but better sounding

Tube amplifiers have soft clipping

Vintage stuff can be incredible values

The stuff sold in retail stores is mostly junk

The quality stuff costs more

Audio stores mix and match anything to sell, not the best combinations

The really expensive stuff is only marginally better

The jitter of CDs and tubes wears out your ears

Vibration isolation platforms can make a significant improvement

Tweaks are well worth it, if you do not spend a lot of money

I can hear the differences that Stereophile reveals in their measurements

The flatter and wider the frequency response of the system, the better it sounds

The better great systems sound, the more alike they sound

Most people rarely hear music without amplifiers

Size and looks are just as important to most people as the quality of sound

Most audiophiles are NOT trying to create a 3D sonic holograph

Many audiophiles just want the movie theater/rock concert sound

The quantity of the watts matters less than the quality of them

Doubling power as impedance drops is the most important measure of bass control

Tube amplifiers have very high current

THD is not that important

Horn speakers have stunningly less distortion than other speakers

The type of distortion matters

Speaker efficiency is incredibly important to the quality of the amplifier

Woofer impedance can over-ride an amplifier and effect frequency response

Solid-state amplifiers really do control bass better

Properly tuned and adjusted, it really is possible to create a simple 3D sonic holograph

Phonograph records have the type of harmonic distortion that tube amplifiers and acoustic instruments

Adding a sub-woofer to a big screen TV makes an incredible improvement

Misconceptions

Bose is the best (not mine, my friends)

You have to spend a lot to get a great system

Refurbished integrated tube amplifiers are incredible values

Chip amplifiers are incredible values

Manufacturers will pass the extreme low cost of chip amplifiers onto the consumer

Speaker wire doesn’t matter

Power conditioners and cords don’t matter

Dull systems have more “inner resolution”

The system should try and sound like the movie theater or rock concert

A good system will sound good anywhere

Tweaks are worth it

Room treatments are just added expense

Newer is better

Name brand is better

Audio stores have the best systems

Modest systems don’t need subs, EQ or room treatments

Equalizers harm the purity of the sound more than improve it

It is a free country, you can criticize Bose in your review without getting sued

All Bose speakers are over priced crap

Nothing at Radio Shack is any good

Everything Monster sells is a rip-off

Bi-amping is not worth it

The sound systems in big screen TVs is good enough

Link to comment
Share on other sites


REVELATION:

I am subject to having misconceptions

MISCONCEPTION:

My system would be just right for anyone else.

People with systems better than mine are obsessive and foolishly chasing that which can't be heard.

People with systems inferior to mine are clueless and don't hear music as I do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


REVELATION:

I am subject to having misconceptions

MISCONCEPTION:

My system would be just right for anyone else.

People with systems better than mine are obsessive and foolishly chasing that which can't be heard.

People with systems inferior to mine are clueless and don't hear music as I do.

God I love objective!

Good one, Paul

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

REVELATION:

I am subject to having misconceptions

MISCONCEPTION:

My system would be just right for anyone else.

People with systems better than mine are obsessive and foolishly chasing that which can't be heard.

People with systems inferior to mine are clueless and don't hear music as I do.

+2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...