--udson Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 I have an upgrade itch. I've always been half happy with the RSW-15. I don't know if it's my setup and settings, but often it seems to have more of a muddy one note rumble than deep and tight performance with lots of range. Does that make sense? Does anyone know if the RT-12d provides a worthwhile upgrade? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sivadselim Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 [udson"]Does that make sense? No Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frzninvt Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Your best bet is to go out a demo one, then you can make direct comparisons to your RSW. There are things that you can tweek on the RSW though to smooth its response. Like crossover point, volume level, phase, room position, preamp sub level, etc. That could make it sound better to you. That said it is reported despite what the specs say that there is not much usable response below 30Hz (real world performance), a local friend of mine has one and it sounds fabulous to me paired with his Cornwalls/Altec 511's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
customsteve01 Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 I have heard several RSW's and did not notice what you are discribing. I have the RT-12D and love it. You need to go listen to one and see if you hear a differance. That is what matters. Steve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trooper Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 If you're hearing "muddy one note rumble" from an RSW it's because of room acoustics and/or placement not the sub itself. The RT-12 is very similar in sound and if you place it where the RSW is it will probably sound the same. (I've heard and had them both.) But on the RT you can run the room calibration and that may tame some of the room acoustic problems and improve the sound. It helped in my room. A cheaper alternative would be to move your RSW around and see if you can find a location that lets it sound better to you. But if you're stuck with that location for the sub or you just want an "upgrade" the RT is very nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
--udson Posted November 8, 2007 Author Share Posted November 8, 2007 Thanks for the tips guys. I will try to find some time to play around with it more. I am sure half my problem is lack of experience and knowledge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWho Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 I can't help but point out that the majority of a sub's performance is dictated by the acoustics of the room. If you get the chance, try walking around the room while you've got some bass heavy music playing. You should notice spots in the room where there seems to be no bass at all, while in other positions (like the corners) there will be more bass than you can handle. The reason for this has to do with standing waves in the room - which you can learn more about by doing a google search on "room modes". Here's a really good article if you want to get more into the nitty gritty: http://www.rpginc.com/cgi-bin/byteserver.pl/news/library/PS_AcD.pdf This article touches on the concept of room modes too, but is concentrating on the concept of using more than one subwoofer: http://www.harman.com/wp/pdf/multsubs.pdf As far as moving to the RT-12d...one thing you might benefit from is the fancy ARC feature. While I'll never support the notion that EQ can fix acoustics problems, it can certainly be used to reduce their impact. The RSW-15 will always play louder and lower than the RT-12d simply because it's a larger cabinet and has way more cone surface area. One thing that's interesting about the ARC is that you can use it with other existing subs too....so if you moved to the RT-12d, you could use both it and the RSW-15 together and take advantage of whatever all it is that the ARC does. Anyways, before spending money on band-aid features, I would see if you couldn't achieve better results by moving the sub and listening position around first. After that, you might look into some acoustical treatments, but if that's not an option then purchasing another sub and putting it in a different position in the room might yield some positive benefits - though it could yield some negative ones too - it all depends on how well everything is implemented. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fish Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Is it just me or do we see lotsa Yamaha/Klipsch sound issues? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest srobak Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 Why do you think I bought an HK receiver? Realistically - the only choices to be had were Yammi or HK for my system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay481985 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 Yeah.... I am having fond memories of my HK 3480 , since upgrading (is it upgrading) to a denon 3805 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wuzzzer Posted November 10, 2007 Share Posted November 10, 2007 Yeah.... I am having fond memories of my HK 3480 , since upgrading (is it upgrading) to a denon 3805 Well Jay if you're ever in Minnesota you can drop by and listen to mine for nostalgia. [] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay481985 Posted November 10, 2007 Share Posted November 10, 2007 well since you offered [] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrench722 Posted November 11, 2007 Share Posted November 11, 2007 I thank it has a lot to do with placement of the sub. The RSW-15 is a better sub then the RT-12b. Look at the numbers.[8-|] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay481985 Posted November 11, 2007 Share Posted November 11, 2007 I thank it has a lot to do with placement of the sub. The RSW-15 is a better sub then the RT-12b. Look at the numbers.[8-|] I disagree, numbers tell you one aspect, the rt-12d is capable and it can be placed in places the rsw15 can't be, its more waf, etc that it can be justified on more basis that just numbers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrench722 Posted November 12, 2007 Share Posted November 12, 2007 I thank it has a lot to do with placement of the sub. The RSW-15 is a better sub then the RT-12b. Look at the numbers.[8-|] I disagree, numbers tell you one aspect, the rt-12d is capable and it can be placed in places the rsw15 can't be, its more waf, etc that it can be justified on more basis that just numbers The RT-12d is made for the corner and the RSW-15 can be put on any wall. The RSW-15 has three times power. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay481985 Posted November 12, 2007 Share Posted November 12, 2007 I thank it has a lot to do with placement of the sub. The RSW-15 is a better sub then the RT-12b. Look at the numbers.[8-|] I disagree, numbers tell you one aspect, the rt-12d is capable and it can be placed in places the rsw15 can't be, its more waf, etc that it can be justified on more basis that just numbers The RT-12d is made for the corner and the RSW-15 can be put on any wall. The RSW-15 has three times power. actually you can place it anywhere, why does that need to be put in the corner? three times the power says whom? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Traveler Posted November 12, 2007 Share Posted November 12, 2007 ..actually you can place it anywhere, why does that need to be put in the corner? three times the power says whom? The RT-12d doesn't have 3 times the power of the RSW-15. On page 2 of the manual it says it's better to place it in the corner for the best results. Fwiw it's also better to put the RSW 15 in the corner as well. I think getting a RT-12d in addition to the RSW 15 would be awesome, but I for one wouldn't consider replacing the RSW-15. YMMV. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrench722 Posted November 12, 2007 Share Posted November 12, 2007 I thank it has a lot to do with placement of the sub. The RSW-15 is a better sub then the RT-12b. Look at the numbers.[8-|] I disagree, numbers tell you one aspect, the rt-12d is capable and it can be placed in places the rsw15 can't be, its more waf, etc that it can be justified on more basis that just numbers The RT-12d is made for the corner and the RSW-15 can be put on any wall. The RSW-15 has three times power. actually you can place it anywhere, why does that need to be put in the corner? three times the power says whom? Says whom? Klipsch Thats whom. READ the numbers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Traveler Posted November 12, 2007 Share Posted November 12, 2007 I'm sorry wrench722, but that's not what I am reading in the specs. [^o)] There is a 1dB difference in the 2 subs, although it appears the RSW 15 may have a slightly bigger amp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sivadselim Posted November 12, 2007 Share Posted November 12, 2007 RT-12d = 800w continuous, 2000w peak RSW-15 = 650w continuous, 2400w peak The rest of their specs are VERY similar. Either one should rock the house and both should be articulate subs, not muddy or boomy as the OP described. If either is muddy/boomy then there may be a placement issue or the subwoofer needs to be calibrated. I think there is a very good chance the OP runs his too 'hot'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.