Rich_Guy Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 BTW, the arrows should always flow with the direction of the writing on the cable. Always -> like -> this-> Never <- like <- this <- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmikid Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Audio is AC. It flows in both directions. No, the harshness of the tweeter are the electrons blasted through your brain. With Iron Maiden they are even radioactive! Makes your head bang... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
expatmatt Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 It really depends on if your system is set up to follow Conventional Flow, or Electron Flow. If Ben Franklin put the arrows on the cable, everything is probably ok. In any case, to make sure you do this properly, as Timmikid pointed out, audio signals are AC. That means you want to actually swap the cable direction every time the signal direction changes. Hope your arms don't get too tired. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWho Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 The "directional" cables just have the shield lifted on the end that is supposed to be receiving the signal. The idea is that any EMI currents get shunted back to the low impedance of the source device and don't get transmitted down stream Exactly. It has nothing to do with electron "flow" (sic) direction.But not all manufacturers agree which end should be lifted, e.g., Siltech, who sees it the opposite of everyone else. I reversed all my I/C's once and couldn't tell a whit of difference in noise level. The AES48-2005 standard says to keep it connected at the sourcing device unless the sourcing device has a floating reference for the outputs (like with transformer coupled outputs). In fact, the AES48-2005 standard mentions that it's best to keep the shield connected at both ends (to provide some magnetic field protection) unless it creates a ground loop... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 That my cable between my CD player and my amp was backwards. The little arrows marking the direction of the signal flow were going the wrong way so I swapped them around. I'm not sure if it makes a difference but it gives me peace of mind which happens to be the name of the Iron Maiden album I've misplaced -josh Yep putting this cable in backwards is necessary to hear those backward satanic messages in heavy metal music. Does this work better than actually spinning Zeppelins records backwards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete H Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 That my cable between my CD player and my amp was backwards. The little arrows marking the direction of the signal flow were going the wrong way so I swapped them around. I'm not sure if it makes a difference but it gives me peace of mind which happens to be the name of the Iron Maiden album I've misplaced -josh Yep putting this cable in backwards is necessary to hear those backward satanic messages in heavy metal music. Does this work better than actually spinning Zeppelins records backwards. Spinning Zeppelin Records Backwards.....................That's Great Duder[] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 I never believed this worked, but thats probably cause I kept trying it with cds. When a buddy of mine had it on vinyl and showed me, it got me wondering. duder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groomlakearea51 Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 Just go with the flow..... [H] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators dtel Posted January 16, 2010 Moderators Share Posted January 16, 2010 Just go with the flow..... I always believed that until we walked to the far end of Bourbon Street, the flow was + to +, I like a steady + to - . [:$] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neo33 Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 Now, that's funny! [] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WMcD Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 I agree with the good Doctor. I remember something from the 1970's or earlier recommending that the the shield be broken at the receiving end. The theory is that we should avoid any current flowing in the shield. However, I believe this also required that the chassis (sp? - plural) of all the equipment be connected with a ground strap to ensure that they are at ground potential. Wm McD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.