oldenough

Going for an MG V8 conversion, as per the factory V8, except 3.9 litre...Unfortunately will have to sacrifice the wire wheels....

MGB GT...with the only wheels that an MG should have.

My winter project...

I had the same problem with mine, posted about it here a couple of years ago. Was very happy to find that the problem was a simple fix, still very satisfied with this sub.

It will work, but probably not the best application for it, now if it could do automatic "focus stacking" as easily as it does HDR then us macro-photographers would really have a fun tool in our hands.

This is an "old school" turntable that while not high on the food chain has always performed well for me....Pioneer PL-530...Slap a Shure M97xe on it and it will probably do everything you need from a t/t....No mine is not for sale, it's my default deck....

Yup!!....You could spend a lot more money and still not improve on that turntable....good call.

Agreed there are too many people who say they don't care, until the minute they wake up and realise that seemingly innocent piece of technology has eroded away a piece of THEIR privacy. I can never understand that attitude. This is MY world, my life, and my freedom, and I value it.

Dtel, my computer's built in camera has been taped over since I bought it.

RF5's manufactured in Hope, with furniture grade veneer.... Yes the RF5 is the better speaker than the RF3.

Yeah it can be addictive, I discovered the Tv show "Top Gear", the British version, you couldn't tear either myself or my wife away from it till we had seen every episode of six seasons.

It pleases me to see that stupidity is as prevalent here as any other forum...

Had the 430,630 and 730, only the 630 remains with me, I found it to be the best of the three, but they all deserve the good reputation they have.

Industrial with brass handles and a high gloss???

Yup, a spec that is proudly advertised on the back of them, and your correct about the audible difference...purely a marketing dept requirement. The RB-5 was a very well received speaker, the critics were for the best part in agreement that it was one fine speaker.

Yes, only difference is finish, I own both rb5 and rb5ii and they are an excellent speaker.

Had a chance to listen to a pair of these back in the day....I'd love to own a pair.

I have tested other Klipsch subs against it. So yes, I do know that to me it sounds better and have found no reason to call it mediocre by any means. I wasn't aware I was supposed to give you a headline grabbing comparison - I was under the impression I was going to give you the model of the sub I personal find suits my ears better. I have tested other Klipsch subs against it. So yes, I do know that to me it sounds better and have found no reason to call it mediocre by any means. I wasn't aware I was supposed to give you a headline grabbing comparison - I was under the impression I was going to give you the model of the sub I personal find suits my ears better. My apologies...http://www.phonak.com/ca/b2c/en/products/hearing_instruments.html.......

Polk DSWPRO660 not exactly a headline grabbing comparison...

Interesting!! Which Polk subs are you using that you feel would better the Klipsch offerings?

That's exactly what I thought when I saw it...I just don't think that is needed in advertising...Sorry.

That's the great thing about statistics...You can use them to get the answer you want...

Yeah, I came across those too, but that's about all you can find on the inter-web. Well for $200 I might just get it from him, it sure is a nice looking bit of kit.