Jump to content

HDMI vs component


psg

Recommended Posts

Doesn't matter, right?

I just learn the hard way that it does.

 

I used to feed two TVs with one Sat decoder, feeding one far away using the HDMI output of the decoder and the other using the component output (to the AVR and then a 50-inch 720p plasma in my HT room).  When I upgraded to Optik TV a while back, each TV now had its own decoder but I didn't bother to swap in a HDMI cable in the HT room and kept using the component cable to my AVR (and then HDMI to the TV).  I was never happy with the blacks on that TV.

 

Jump to this week when I get my fancy new Samung 60F8500 plasma.  The picture is much better, but even after I calibrate black levels (brightness set to factory 45) I am loosing a lot of details in crushed blacks watching TV.  Anything dark is black.  I have to crank up brightness to 65 to make up some of the detail.  But the picture is perfect on Blurays.  So I figure it must be a setting on the Optik TV decoder... then it hits me that it is getting an analog signal from my component connection and reconverting it to digital to send over HDMI to the TV!  I swap in an HDMI cable between the TV decoder and the AVR and BAM!  The picture is now perfect with brightness set to 45!  Lots of dark detail!

 

So the black levels weren't so bad on my old TV!  I have been giving it a handicap for years using component instead of HDMI!  Years lost!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

Good personal experience.  Thx for sharing.  I too have always read that Component is almost as good as HDMI (1080i vs 1080p).  Maybe progressive vs interlaced makes a difference?  Glad to hear you are now enjoying the full potential from your display.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good personal experience.  Thx for sharing.  I too have always read that Component is almost as good as HDMI (1080i vs 1080p).  Maybe progressive vs interlaced makes a difference?  Glad to hear you are now enjoying the full potential from your display.

 

The Optik TV (basically fiber-optic delivery) decoder sends out either 720p or 1080i, which was why i didn't think component would make a difference.  I guess it's the extra D/A and A/D steps involved that degraded the image.

Audio was run over toslink.

Edited by psg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I learned something today then too. hdmi audio is better than optical. I currently run optical...until the next upgrade I guess...

 

You guys are the best....

Why wait... Just pull the optical cable and start using your HDMI cables... Unless you don't have HDMI..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got to go HDMI. Night and day different that component/optical

 

Help me here.

 

Are we talking audibly better for BD movies, SACD's, DVDA's, or CD's?  I know HDMI can pass high resolution audio and optical and digital coax can't but for redbook CD's, is there a noticeable difference?

 

Bill 

Edited by willland
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great timing for me on this topic as I am about to swap an 11 year old Outlaw processor without HDMI with a Pioneer Elite AVR.  My only issue is the Pioneer AVR doesn't have an OTA/coax input, so I have to run the OTA coax directly into my TV,  The TV doesn't have an HDMI out, only an optical out of of the TV, so it appears to be my only option for OTA, but seeing as OTA is only 5.1 at best, who cares, right?  I was going to go HDMI out of the Oppo player directly to the TV, because it is native 1080P, but I think I will go to the AVR to take advantage of the superior audio signal discussed in this thread, and hope that there is no video signal degradation.  There are two HDMI outs on the Oppo, so I suppose I could possibly use one for video direct to the TV, and the other for audio to the AVR, or is that not possible?  Likely not necessary, and just go with one to the AVR.  I didn't know optical could not pass Dolby True HD or DTS MA.  What about coax?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I learned something today then too. hdmi audio is better than optical. I currently run optical...until the next upgrade I guess...

 

You guys are the best....

Why wait... Just pull the optical cable and start using your HDMI cables... Unless you don't have HDMI..

 

im using hdmi out to projector, but optical out to amp. amp doesn't have hdmi yet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only way to take advantage of DTS Master and Dolby TrueHD is either HDMI or multi-channel audio outputs

O.K.  I already have the mutli-channel audio outputs and cables and plan to hook them all up.  Aside from the multiple cables, do you guys think it is a good idea to hook up multiple, meaning optical, digital, coax, HDMI and have the flexibility and just document and assign them accordingly to the virtual inputs names?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...