Jump to content

New SPL Meter - interesting findings!


Cut-Throat

Recommended Posts

Just got a new Extech Digital SPL meter and thought I would see what levels I was listening at. I have a Max hold button on it to show you the absolute loudest it measured.

With my Belles powered by my DRD45s and an entire CD

My Listening position - 12 feet from the speakers

* Average 75db - peaks at 78-82db - Loudest measured was 86.4db

At 1 Meter in front of the speakers

* Average 80db - peaks at 86-89db - loudest measured was 97.4db

Any louder than this is painful to me. I am finding that on average I usually listen at around 75db.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know what's causing the pain, but I don't think you would believe if I told you.

Willing to do a little experiment for me? Break out the Van Alstine, and repeat. I believe you'll miraculously see your threshold of "pain" increase, and I predict 105db peaks before discernable discomfort. Do this from the listening position -- 12 feet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Dean,

Already did this - No difference!

If you really are listening at these volumes, you have already suffered hearing loss and that is why you cannot feel any pain. This is not my opinion, but the opinion of medical specialists. You should not be subjecting your ears to 90+ db's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

audiogram2.gif

http://www.gcaudio.com/resources/howtos/loudness.html

Stay away from that heavy street traffic then!

Seriously, duration of exposure is the biggest determining factor in hearing loss. Doing a CD or record at 95 db for 40 minutes is not really an issue. I've been doing it since High School, and can still hear all the test tones up to 15Khz. I can also still tune the G string on my guitar -- something most of my old bandmates can't even do anymore without a tuner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can fart at 80 db . 14.gif

These levels are great listening on the jazz , country etc . But do little to envelope my soul in rock 'n roll .

Some music is better felt than heard if you know what i mean.

95% of my listening is right in your range, so it's nice to have equipment that funtions well in this range.

Then again is even better to have gear that fails to fall apart at 125db as well. Not such an easy task as you might think , i've spent years getting my gear as pure as possible at these levels .

I've come to realize after 20 years that 1 system can't do both ( without emptying the bank )so i employ 2 systems just for that reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the threshold of pain from loud noises dereases with age. As we age, the threshold where we start hearing increases. When the two meet, hearing aids no longer provide any benefit. Bottom line is take care of what you have. Seventy-five decibels will not do any harm and provides lots of enjoyment.

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually have no idea as to the level I normally listen to except for the wattage meters on the amp, which are probable wildly inaccurate (McIntosh MC300).

Normally, I listen to 1/3 of a watt on each channel according to the meters. I can handle peaks of 3 watts if they are only peaks. To show off I turn it up to 10 watts, but only for less than 30 seconds or so. I'm not THAT old that I don't rock out, but JET ENGINE volume is downright painful... take it easy dude, or you'll hurt yourself permanently!

DM2.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the time I listen at 3.5 watts peak. Sometime when it's a special song or I want to feel like at a concert I push it up to 35 watts peak. This with my McIntosh MC352 according to it's meters at hold. In the early days of listening I was always just barely clipping my 150 watt Tandberg (clip lights barely blinking) which according to all studies I should be deaf by now. Of course I'm a sheet metal worker in a shop that's mostly over 90 bds anyway. We get hearing test once a year. I have some hearing lose but am considered to still have good hearing for my age. In the 5 years at this shop my hearing tests have showed no change. So I'm not totally convinced of the hearing loss due to ludness but believe it's the TYPE of lound noises we hear that cause the damage. Of course the sciencetific findings say I'll full of ------

hoggy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when everyone is out of the house and i've sat down dedicating myself to just listening (no tweaking), it's gotta average at least above 100db for at least 4 or 5 songs. It's not music if you can't feel it! 2.gif But then i usually turn it down to around 60db after my ears start fatiguing. As far as hearing loss goes, I can still hear dog whistles, so I think that's a good sign.

I'm not sure of any scientific significance, but I've found that loud SPLs hurt less when you're relaxed and "absorb" the sound. When running around mixing live gigs, I've measured acoustic drums to be as loud as 120-125db at times without amplification...in the meantime I'm running around moving mics and listening to monitors (which adds to the overall volume). Whenever I'm tense, stressed, or physically exhausted, I find myself walking off the stage with nasty ringing hurting ears. But if I take a sip of water, take my time and relax while I do my thing, then I find myself experiencing no discomfort at all. Dunno if it's psychological, but it seems to work in every situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dr. Who's intuition is right on the money according to medical studies.

When I was in college in the 1970's I did a paper on "Noise-induced Hearing Loss" for a course in acoustics at the Physics dept of Temple University. Read a lot of journals on Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (ear-nose-and throat for non-latin speakers). What follows is all from memory (the paper is long gone) so please don't bust my chops if I get some details wrong.

In the studies researchers noted that some types of environmental noise like subway trains, jack-hammers, airplanes, etc. caused hearing damage that actually tore off pieces of the tissue that support the sensory hairs inside the cochlea, where hearing is perceived. That was as expected, and the degree of trauma was proportional to hearing loss.

What puzzled the researchers was that some people where subjected to louder sounds without damage, or with considerably less damage than expected at very loud rock concerts. They eventually corroborated these findings on many subjects, and were convinced that loud music caused less pain and less damage than loud noise.

The question was why? The theory goes like this: the stapes are a series of small bones that connect the eardum to the cochlea. These bones are descriptively named the anvil, hammer, and stirrup. These bones have small muscles that keep them in connected with each other and with the eardrum and cochlea. When we hear a loud or unpleasant sound we reflexively tighten these muscles. This increases the conduction of vibration through the stapes because now they are more tightly connected. Better conduction with loud noises causes more damage.

What is the purpose of this mechanism? Presumably it was developed to increase hearing acuity in times of stress--listening for a predator, stalking prey, avoiding an enemy, etc.

This is why rock music doesn't always cause similar damage at higher levels. The listener is enjoying the loud music, and is not stressed by it so the muscles on the stapes are looser, and less efficient at passing on damaging vibrations.

So you can imagine, if you hate loud rock music it probably will damage your hearing with the same efficiency as a jack-hammer. Also if you are exposed to unexpected loud noises in your environment and you're not wearing hearing protection, you'll be less likely to have damage if you just relax (and cover your ears if possible!)

Finally, be alert for the sensation of hearing damage--a ticklish sensation in the inner ear which means the sensory hairs in the cochlea are being shredded. Move away quickly. If you think it is too loud it really is too loud--regardless of what the meter says.

Dean--I never could keep a plain G in tune, even before I trashed my ears!

Best in horns,

triceratops

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roughly similar levels here too, although it does depend largely on the music.

Rock I tend to listen to louder (which is another reason why all my night-time listening is classical).

Even with Rock I almost never break through 100 dB at my listening position (peak) which is typically 85-95 continuous, again depending on the music.

The most I have recorded with my current speakers was with DSOTM at 1 meter with a peak of 109 dB - but that was just when I was playing with the new Radio shack.

I am told by Tony that the system goes a lot louder than that (he stayed at my house for a week whilst I was away). Frankly - I dont want to know what levels he was listening to. Fortunately for my neighbours the house seems very well sound proofed - at least no-one complained...

My washing machine, on the other hand - is starting to approach the mid 90's on its own - worrying!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Triceratops -- that's some pretty interesting stuff.

I also read once that people routinely exposed to loud "things", have more wax imbedded around those sensitive parts in the inner ear that affords them a level of protection that most others don't possess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...