Jump to content

RF-7II Owners Thread


BluBitRates

Recommended Posts

Yeah...I know that it's a ‘lower end’ or a ‘mid-entry level’ Denon AVR from 08's, but, it does offer the 'Bi-Amp' feature, which I'm exploiting since sometimes... Per Denon Specifications it has 'Identical quality and power for all 7 channels, 110W x 7ch (8 ohms, 20Hz - 20kHz)’.

If you are running 4 RF-7s on a lower end AVR that really isn't going to help much:

http://community.klipsch.com/forums/p/142559/1461527.aspx#1461527

..You are worng. you can Bi-amp these speakers. It's called "passive bi-amp" where you use 2 amp channels for one speaker. And NO it will not hurt the speaker or amp Channel. True, there is not much advantage to it. I have seen tubes on the HF and SS on the LF. I have seen 3:1 power ratio so you can have more LF at low volume, but a bass knob can do the same thing.

If you connect the HF section of the speaker to an amp, the amp will see the 8 Ohms + network load. If the LF section is connected the amp will see a min of 4 Ohms + network....but both will work just fine....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 'theory' at 101dB sensitivity (efficiency) of Klipsch RF-7 II, it should produce 121dB SPL @100W RMS @ 3.3 feet distance from speakers and @ 200W RMS it will produce SPL of 124dB. Basically, to increase the 3dB output from 121dB to 124dB, double power (200W RMS) is required from an amplifier.

....The below link/reference should help one to understand what I'm saying. If I have misunderstood, then open for correction!

http://www.integratedaudio.com/help/sensitivity.pdf

What your article doesn't address is the impedance curve of the speaker in question at different frequencies....Your RF-7s are listed as 101 dB sensitivity and are "8 Ohm Compatible," but that last sentiment can be misleading because it doesn't address that the RF-7s have been reported to dip down to 2.8 Ohms at certain frequencies .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 'theory' at 101dB sensitivity (efficiency) of Klipsch RF-7 II, it should produce 121dB SPL @100W RMS @ 3.3 feet distance from speakers and @ 200W RMS it will produce SPL of 124dB. Basically, to increase the 3dB output from 121dB to 124dB, double power (200W RMS) is required from an amplifier.

....The below link/reference should help one to understand what I'm saying. If I have misunderstood, then open for correction!

http://www.integratedaudio.com/help/sensitivity.pdf

What your article doesn't address is the impedance curve of the speaker in question at different frequencies....Your RF-7s are listed as 101 dB sensitivity and are "8 Ohm Compatible," but that last sentiment can be misleading because it doesn't address that the RF-7s have been reported to dip down to 2.8 Ohms at certain frequencies .

Keep in mind you double the centers power and the surrounds.

My GUESS is if you double the power of 5

channels you will gain around 8-10db (potential mind you). I personally wouldn’t

bi amp if you’re just using the avr for power. When you bi amp instead of doing

7.1 your engaging those 6th and 7th channels into the

fronts and thus pulling power from all the channels to do it (so you won’t see

a 3db increase). I know the manual probably says it’s rated at 7.1 all channels

driven but that’s never the case. You have way more power to go around just using

5 channels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the article has nothing to do to the dynamic response of the speaker and changing impedance for a given frequency. It's merely showing the a relationship of SPL, Sensitivity, and RMS power required at 8 ohms in 'theory'.

To tackle the dynamic response of the speaker that dips up to 2.8 ohms or even lower is 'amplifier' manufacturer's problem. For example, this amplifier went one time in 'safe mode' to prevent amp section from damaging while we were using 'Satellites with Sub-Woofer' in 7.1 configuration. These speakers were 4ohms and I'm pretty sure at some frequencies they were dipping below 2 ohms or even futher when I took it to -10dB. To produce that much of a sound from Klipsch RF-7 II, I don't need to dial more than -45dB. That's the point what I was eluding to with that article, showing the relationship between SPL, Sensitivity, and RMS power.

While, NOT claiming that the 2808ci is a hi-end receiver, there might be a incremental benefit to a cost in upgrading to the powerful amplifier, while typically not playing loud at -10dB and beyond. Just like what 'reference_head' said, 'I would look at a sub before an amp. A sub will blow your mind compared to no sub.' But, then who knows, when the upgrade bug hits me!

Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously, bi-amping is not double the power to the speakers (i.e. 110W RMS to 220W RMS because I bi-amped), but as the last line from 'Trey Cannon' quote states, the major benefit that I see from passive bi-amping is to help isolating HF and LF sections' load or a dipping for a given frequency. Thus LF and HF amplifier sections have their own dips to tackle for a given frequency and hence potentially a better amp response (again in theory, because I don't know how the amplifier section is designed on 2808ci.). In other words less stress/dipping cycles that amp has to recover when compared to combined LF&HF sections.

I totally agree, that very few amps that wouldn't degrade or would handle dipping (dynamic/transient speaker load) without clipping or distorting. So far, with Klipsch RF-7 IIs, we haven't experienced it...Fingers crossed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind you double the centers power and the surrounds. My GUESS is if you double the power of 5 channels you will gain around 8-10db (potential mind you)...

That isn't what Trey is saying in the link I provided and doubling the power to a given speaker results in a 3 dB volume increase is the rule-of-thumb:

http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/manufacture/0907/

"As audio/video hobbyists, most of us grew up thinking that if we have an amplifier with 50 watts of rated output power into 8-ohm speakers, and that combination produces reasonably clean and loud music, then by doubling the amplifier power to 100 watts per channel, the system would then play twice as loud. Many readers likely still believe that. Not so.

Although it's not the easiest thing to comprehend, doubling the amplifier power does not double the loudness. In the above example, the sound from the speakers would not be "twice as loud"; it would only be "a little louder," an increase of 3 decibels."

http://www.proavmagazine.com/acoustics/the-price-of-3-db.aspx

"The loudness increase is logarithmic — twice the applied power always produces the same 3 dB loudness increase."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind you double the centers power and the surrounds. My GUESS is if you double the power of 5 channels you will gain around 8-10db (potential mind you)...

That isn't what Trey is saying in the link I provided and doubling the power to a given speaker results in a 3 dB volume increase is the rule-of-thumb:

http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/manufacture/0907/

"As audio/video hobbyists, most of us grew up thinking that if we have an amplifier with 50 watts of rated output power into 8-ohm speakers, and that combination produces reasonably clean and loud music, then by doubling the amplifier power to 100 watts per channel, the system would then play twice as loud. Many readers likely still believe that. Not so.

Although it's not the easiest thing to comprehend, doubling the amplifier power does not double the loudness. In the above example, the sound from the speakers would not be "twice as loud"; it would only be "a little louder," an increase of 3 decibels."

http://www.proavmagazine.com/acoustics/the-price-of-3-db.aspx

"The loudness increase is logarithmic — twice the applied power always produces the same 3 dB loudness increase."

So with one speaker you gain 3db. But we are doubling the

power x5( 5 different times to 5 different speakers). It’s like going from 1

powered sub to 5 right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While, NOT claiming that the 2808ci is a hi-end receiver, there might be a incremental benefit to a cost in upgrading to the powerful amplifier,... A sub will blow your mind compared to no sub.'

Cheers!Beer

Cheers Pite, and I wasn't ditsing your Denon AVR. I have the Denon AVR 3805 and AVR 3803 driving my other 2 less demanding Klipsch Home Theaters and love them! When I had to drive the HT listed in my sig with the AVR 3805 for a few months, I had to switch out my side surround towers for Bookshelf speakers and then had to listen between 4 and 6 dB lower because of distortion at the higher levels I had been accustomed with my 48XX series AVR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While, NOT claiming that the 2808ci is a hi-end receiver, there might be a incremental benefit to a cost in upgrading to the powerful amplifier,... A sub will blow your mind compared to no sub.'

Cheers!Beer

Cheers Pite, and I wasn't ditsing your Denon AVR. I have the Denon AVR 3805 and AVR 3803 driving my other 2 less demanding Klipsch Home Theaters and love them! When I had to drive the HT listed in my sig with the AVR 3805 for a few months, I had to switch out my side surround towers for Bookshelf speakers and then had to listen between 4 and 6 dB lower because of distortion at the higher levels I had been accustomed with my 48XX series AVR.

np...All, I could say that either we are lucky having one of the nice Denon piece or may be because hearing loud for shorter duration doesn't tax the receiver. Fingers crossed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...