Jump to content

klipsch r 15 sw. 719.00


swa99a

Recommended Posts

I assume you're talking about a R 115 SW. I just picked one up for $559 shipped (new in box) and think it's worth about $459 shipped.

 

It sounds ok and all but just seems very cheap, which I suppose it is. I'm not overly impressed but that big copper woofer is purty....

not a big fan of it? what dont you like about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume you're talking about a R 115 SW. I just picked one up for $559 shipped (new in box) and think it's worth about $459 shipped.

 

It sounds ok and all but just seems very cheap, which I suppose it is. I'm not overly impressed but that big copper woofer is purty....

Hey hey now, I have me one and I like muh big copper woofer!!  LOL  :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I assume you're talking about a R 115 SW. I just picked one up for $559 shipped (new in box) and think it's worth about $459 shipped.

 

It sounds ok and all but just seems very cheap, which I suppose it is. I'm not overly impressed but that big copper woofer is purty....

not a big fan of it? what dont you like about it?

 

I agree Scrappy...what don't you like about it wstrickland1?  Just curious.   I have one and aside from being monstrously loud for the money, it is very clean.  Not Velodyne clean I grant you, but it can run with far more expensive brands and hold it's own easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ehh it's ok I guess, esp. for the money. I guess they had to cut corners somewhere and to me it just has a really cheap feel to it. I tried it with Belles thinking it would match better than my Martin Logan Depth but it doesn't. Maybe it's my particular application which is 2 channel only. The system consists of a C2500 tube preamp, MC275 mkVI amp, Belles, and various sources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ehh it's ok I guess, esp. for the money. I guess they had to cut corners somewhere and to me it just has a really cheap feel to it. I tried it with Belles thinking it would match better than my Martin Logan Depth but it doesn't. Maybe it's my particular application which is 2 channel only. The system consists of a C2500 tube preamp, MC275 mkVI amp, Belles, and various sources.

You make valid points.  I wouldn't say cheaply made, but it is middle of the road.  I really like it, but whatever sounds good to you is what matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean an RSW-15?  That is awful pricey for a 10 year old subwoofer unless it is mint and brand new in the box.  You can get a new subwoofer for that.

Not sure how I missed this, but the RSW-15 would curb stomp the offerings from Klipsch right now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am in the minority here but I wasn't overly impressed with any of the Kipsch subs I have owned, even the mighty touted RSW-15. That is the main reason I decided to pass on the R-115SW, even though the reviews have been very positive.

 

I just ordered a Reaction Audio Gamma 15 sub with the I.C.E. amp. I will try that sub out for the 45 day trial period (free shipping both ways!), if it doesn't impress me, I might consider the R-115SW. I love the copper cones :wub:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...