rackmeister Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 or give Audiovox rights to my photos Come on now. I'd be really surprised to learn that Audiovox wants the rights to anybody's photos around here. Thanks for the reply, JL. Yep, I agree that it's a long shot that they would want to do anything beyond hosting them in the forum. But the Terms of Service do award them unlimited usage rights to our posted content "in connection with the Service" which some web services (like Facebook if I mistake not) have interpreted to allow its use for e.g. promotional purposes, so I like to be cautious. From the TOS: All Content you submit becomes the property of Klipsch Group, Inc. We reserve the rights to remove or modify any Content submitted for any reason without explanation. Requests for Content to be removed or modified will be undertaken only at our discretion. You are granting us with a non-exclusive, permanent, irrevocable, unlimited license to use, publish, or re-publish your Content in connection with the Service. You retain copyright over the Content. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtimer Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Yep. It's the MDeneen clause. Mark Deneen forever associated with Kilpsch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators dtel Posted October 30, 2015 Moderators Share Posted October 30, 2015 (edited) It's not hard to recognize someone's style of photo's, composition, subject, and exposure, a dead giveaway sometimes. No matter what Klipsch would want to do with the pic's there online elsewhere after you post them, I have ran across my own pic's while searching subjects not on this forum. Edited October 30, 2015 by dtel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigStewMan Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 now i’m scared. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rackmeister Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 No matter what Klipsch would want to do with the pic's there online elsewhere after you post them, I have ran across my own pic's while searching subjects not on this forum. Yep, the only foolproof ways to protect them from unauthorized use are to not post them, or to restrict viewing privileges to trustworthy people only. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Naseum Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 or give Audiovox rights to my photos Come on now. I'd be really surprised to learn that Audiovox wants the rights to anybody's photos around here. Thanks for the reply, JL. Yep, I agree that it's a long shot that they would want to do anything beyond hosting them in the forum. But the Terms of Service do award them unlimited usage rights to our posted content "in connection with the Service" which some web services (like Facebook if I mistake not) have interpreted to allow its use for e.g. promotional purposes, so I like to be cautious. From the TOS: All Content you submit becomes the property of Klipsch Group, Inc. We reserve the rights to remove or modify any Content submitted for any reason without explanation. Requests for Content to be removed or modified will be undertaken only at our discretion. You are granting us with a non-exclusive, permanent, irrevocable, unlimited license to use, publish, or re-publish your Content in connection with the Service. You retain copyright over the Content. You're a pro and you certainly do have to protect yourself even from unlikely exposure. I guess it's good you read the TOS carefully! Good on you. It would be a million to 1 that audiovox would use your stuff, but then again that Big Balloon did break loose on a million to one shot in Pennsylvania! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schu Posted October 31, 2015 Share Posted October 31, 2015 water mark... problem solved Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldenough Posted October 31, 2015 Share Posted October 31, 2015 Watermarks don't stop people from using them...Plus I can remove a watermark in seconds. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schu Posted October 31, 2015 Share Posted October 31, 2015 (edited) I bet you can't remove on in "seconds"... and not one photo posted here is worth the effort. good photographs are really a dime a dozen. Edited October 31, 2015 by Schu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Naseum Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 Almost a dime. My photographer friend used to get $1200 for a photo used in a commercial brochure. Stock houses grew by millions of photos. When they went below $100 he got out. Now they go for $25...... And less! Sent from my ALCATEL A564C using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mungkiman Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 Consider not posting any photographs intended for publication/recognition, elsewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldenough Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 I bet you can't remove on in "seconds"... and not one photo posted here is worth the effort.I stand corrected...It took me 49 seconds.... 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fjd Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 (edited) When I drive through various towns, I'm somewhat amazed at the "creativity" that goes into erecting the water towers. Here is one taken with a cheap auto focus camera from an open car window as we drove by. I suppose that any watermarks on this picture would be from leaks in the tower. . Edited November 2, 2015 by Fjd 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Full Range Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 (edited) Recently went to a wedding that was held at a winery on top of a hill This photo is a look at there dam that's used for irrigation from above Edited November 2, 2015 by Full Range 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JL Sargent Posted November 2, 2015 Author Share Posted November 2, 2015 Those are the skinniest little evergreens I've ever seen along that driveway. Sure is a pretty place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Full Range Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 Those are the skinniest little evergreens I've ever seen along that driveway. Sure is a pretty place. I think they are called pencil pines but they could also be young plants It was a very nice place 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators dtel Posted November 2, 2015 Moderators Share Posted November 2, 2015 Or young Italian Cypress trees ? Nice looking place either way. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvel Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 Church in Bacong, Negros Oriental, PH. Built in late 1800s... The organ, built in Spain, metal and wood pipes, the wood being bamboo. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvel Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 I hate posting from my phone... :-( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nismo Posted November 4, 2015 Share Posted November 4, 2015 Took these this morning. Not the most exciting: 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.