Schu

...

come on folks... let's break a hundred donors.

that's a beautiful piece...

Has that one base board been replaced or is it just the photo angle?

I also got this Topping MX3 to drive my Focal computer speakers in a 2.1 setup...

Crites are just OEM replacements... don't expect sonic enhancement beyond original specifications.

Gojira

I thought that he is Joseph... Much of that analysis/gain is centered around the throat transition... controlling directivity after that transition is just a matter of taste or preferences. Someone send him a 402 so he can rip it a new arsehole.

I got a pair of NEW FOCAL speakers for my recently built AMD Computer System...

Buy used and save money... because they wont be the last Klipsch speakers you will buy.

Since you are located in Nippon, and just want a taste, I would just look for a used class A amplifier in the <50 watt range. it can be tubes or solid state... $1000us should get you something really nice.

I think these are the first Klipsch speakers I ever purchased... the original metadata says Jan 2004.

Craigs completely restored Scott compares to an do it yourself Amp Camp Amp?

Tony TS McPhee... The cream of British blues.

Good... Not Good...

if that surface has Micro perforations or slats, then yes... it is probably some form of sound absorption.

all direct radiating Subwoofers are more alike than they are different...

I think I cross mine even lower than that... or I raised the bass bin cut off as opposed to letting roll off naturally. its been a while since I've look at the settings.

Ancora Qui (Ennio Morricone)

how many channels are you trying to achieve?

whats the old fellas name?

flanks? do you mean First Reflection points? if so, that position is the most important point, with the back wall being second. your room looks as if it could use some sound cloud panels because of the low flat parallel ceiling layout. this is my next room mod if I ever get around to it... my room has only four parallel surfaces as the ceiling is slanted in a couple angles and is also very tall at 9' in the front and over 13' in the back... like an inverse stadium. once again, I am not a fan of absorption on the front wall because of first hand experience of using panels in that placement and what happens to the sound stage and the center image. to my ears, it is effective at reflection reduction, but it also flattens the image and removes dimensional aspects of that center image. It does clean up the transients though. overall you have an extremely good start, and I am sure you are very happy.

Like the body of a acoustic guitar, or other hollow bodied acoustic instrument, a room is part of the sound signature... and the tone woods used do indeed change the timbre and sound. I am also open ended on one side like your room... it's not ideal, but it works.