Jump to content

Headphones

Talk about our in-ear and on-ear headphones here.


1149 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 7.7k views
    • 31 replies
    • 17.5k views
    • 0 replies
    • 139 views
    • 0 replies
    • 193 views
    • 15 replies
    • 4.7k views
  1. The Perfect Headphones

    • 8 replies
    • 2.8k views
    • 7 replies
    • 8.5k views
    • 0 replies
    • 467 views
    • 0 replies
    • 497 views
  2. HP-3 Headphones 1 2

    • 20 replies
    • 4.8k views
    • 155 replies
    • 70.1k views
  3. ESS Phones?

    • 1 reply
    • 823 views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.4k views
    • 22 replies
    • 14.4k views
    • 3 replies
    • 3.1k views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.7k views
  4. Custom 3 cables 1 2 3

    • 58 replies
    • 3.5k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.3k views
  5. T5 Klipsch Connect App

    • 5 replies
    • 4.3k views
    • 2 replies
    • 2.9k views
  6. Klipsch T5

    • 0 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 9 replies
    • 3.4k views
    • 24 replies
    • 3.5k views
    • 6 replies
    • 4.9k views
    • 21 replies
    • 3.3k views
  • Recent Posts

    • Hey Cappy - I wanted to keep this particular design simple. It can technically drive some grid current, but not much. My intention is to get DIY'ers to build and gain experience (if new in the hobby) to build a SE amp. A lot of people can build from a schematic and PCB vs a schematic & point-to-point wiring.    No doubt there are alternate circuits that can be used here, but I am already slightly larger than the orignal Get*SET*Go PCB and I did not want to design a "hybrid circuit".    I know you prefer to drive grids positive for the headroom, but awhile back you did a poll on how much power we actually use when listening, I believe your results surprised a lot of poeple and the power used was quite low in most circumstances. If this is the case, then for a lot of tubes used with this driver circuit, we should have plenty of power without going to A2. I love A2, but this driver PCB was not designed with that in mind this time around.       
    • That’s why I keep recommending to the good folks of this forum, to open a Discogs account and you have a free online catalog of your Record and CD collection  After entering your collection you can have an spreadsheet list emailed to you and print a hard copy if you prefer  And of course everything is also online 
    • A sensible post. I feel the same. There are a lot of different ways to enjoy recordings.
    • Come to Lynchburg. I'll convince ya...😁
    • I agree with you on all points. But I still enjoy my Stirling Broadcast LS 3/6 and LS 3/5 V2 for other reasons besides my old LaScala and the Underground Jubilees. I find that the richness of tone and naturalness of timbre for acoustic instruments like a classical guitar or string quartet is very good with these British BBC designs. Even a piano sounds very natural and with attack. But it is and remains (only) a psychoacoustic imagination. They are not more than imagined attacks, perhaps because the stop of the tones also works quite well. That's all I demand from these speakers. Never would they match the dynamics and stage size of the real sound event, as horns achieve this much better. But they have a meaning for me. It is just something different. I would also never think that the very large and very expensive cone and dome designs which use many drivers, such as those from Wilson, KEF, B&W or others (did someone say "Aspen"?🙃) can ever even come close to matching the "natural dynamics and power" of good horns. No, my personal experience is that big loud cone designs always tend to sound too much "electrical" and not natural. Cone designs like this BBC style speakers are no more to me than a good old tube kitchen radio used to be. A cozy fatigue-free nice sound that reminds me of the original only at moderate volume levels.
    • My recipe is a ground bus too. It's something I've done for 20 years and always yields excellent results. I use the solid copper ground conductor (or strip the black/white conductor) from a length of 14/2 household wiring for my ground bus and route this through the amp. One end terminates at the power supply capacitors, the other end at the RCA inputs.   I always ensure my RCA's are isolated/insulated and do not ground to the chassis when mounted. The RCA's are connected to the ground bus at one end. I also connect the chassis (earth) ground to the RCA end of the ground bus through the below circuit to keep the signal ground and earth ground paths separate. The essentially turns your metal chassis into a big shield to keep EMI/RFI out of your circuit, which is why I like a full metal chassis.    The ground bus is connected to the amp circuitry as the Captain said; power supply caps at one end (since this end of the bus has the most ripple) then subsequently less "ripple sections" attached to the bus toward the RCA end of the bus.    An X or Y safety cap can be used or a mylar one as well. I came across a bunch of X caps for free and I use them. 
    • Actually, that has been my thought. Which do you think sounds "better?" Mind you, Shaky has not yet convinced me to go back to vinyl, so CDs through LSIIs are the usual path. Thanks in advance.
    • A little rambling about tubes. The coating of the cathode in the tube is what separates a good tube from a not so good one. Something the old maker of tubes did so well. What makes Western Electric tubes so sought after and highly prized. It was their highly guarded secrete sauce they perfected back in the day when tubes ruled. The late Roger Modjeski said he once went to a European country that made what he thought was excellent sounding tubes. He saw the vat they mixed the ingredients in and they let it sit overnight every time. He said he did not know what was in the vat that made the tubes sound so good. He said it could have been the janitor urinating in the vat overnight that made them sound good.  This was said in his lecture at a Burning Amp Festival held yearly. Made me laugh. 
×
×
  • Create New...