Jump to content

Headphones

Talk about our in-ear and on-ear headphones here.


1157 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 8.2k views
    • 3 replies
    • 4.2k views
    • 4 replies
    • 3.7k views
    • 5 replies
    • 145 views
    • 0 replies
    • 224 views
    • 1 reply
    • 114 views
    • 5 replies
    • 590 views
    • 0 replies
    • 152 views
  1. Klipsch T5 ii

    • 0 replies
    • 52 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 3 replies
    • 232 views
    • 1 reply
    • 709 views
    • 0 replies
    • 153 views
    • 4 replies
    • 1k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.3k views
    • 2 replies
    • 694 views
    • 1 reply
    • 563 views
    • 0 replies
    • 632 views
    • 15 replies
    • 5.3k views
    • 7 replies
    • 9.3k views
  2. HP-3 Headphones 1 2

    • 20 replies
    • 5.7k views
    • 155 replies
    • 73.6k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.9k views
    • 22 replies
    • 16.3k views
    • 2 replies
    • 2.4k views
  • Recent Posts

    • Yes. I measure everything in grams. I do the same with second rise but now use a 12 lb. cast iron loaf pan.
    • Newbie mistake. Sorry. Hope your not offended. 
    • Nay, Nay, Nay   That's all your fault I had to get that 'Usual Suspects"... thanks!
    • My thoughts...   I went Forte, Heresy- CW4.  Huge difference along the way.  I thought La Scala would be the end game speaker.  They are dang good for sure.  I did not hear one at home though so hard to tell.  I run mid mono tube amps and the CWs sound exceptional. I went to cardas interconnects and kept my Kimber speaker cable (for now).  The combination of overall sound and bass is top notch in my book.  Also I love the way they sound at low volume which I do a lot as I wake up early.   Based on your initial post and what you listen to, you would probably be very happy with either. Especially as you do not feel the need for a sub.  Personally I can't imagine a system without a sub but that's just me.  I listen to a lot of acoustic and jazz but also rock. Everyone is different.     So after a listen and speaking with some experts would I trade my CW4s for La Scala- No.  The law of diminishing returns is alive and well in audio but imho, particularly so in this scenario.  Big jump $ wise for what is essentially a trade off (bass vs some mids).  Unfortunately  I think the only appreciable path on Heritage line is Jubilee.  And that ain't happening any time soon...lol..
    • Great!  We both can blame billybob.  hahahaha 
    • Umm…did you not see that this was posted in 2014?  The OP hasn’t been back on the forum since then.
    • I also suggest turning the heat down to 450 D.
    • Well my subwoofer’s plate amplifier has an internal crossover (actually, a pretty good one), so there is really no need to tap into the woofer leg of the Khorn’s network because the sub only allows the low frequencies to pass to the driver any way.  Also, a Khorn’s woofer leg crosses over at 400Hz (around the middle of the piano), so the frequency range would not be appropriate for a subwoofer which should really operate at frequencies about 80Hz and below.    However, you do give me idea for  a potential solution: I could make a resistor box that brings down the amplifier’s speaker output to any potential “line level” I desire (picture plugging into an  RCA jack with a “stepped down” speaker lead signal). Similar to what you are saying but with a full range signal allowing the sub’s internal crossover to determine the low pass.    Thank you for your thoughtful replies.    Respectfully,   Andy
    • Had Leslie singing "Don't Call Me Legend" earlier today!
×
×
  • Create New...