Jump to content

When Did We Become So Wimpy On The Forum?


tidmack

Recommended Posts

On 9/9/2016 at 4:47 PM, jwc said:

 ... What about "updating" not "upgrading"? 

OK so no sell upgrades on forum.  But if unlistenable buying vintage Heritage...and Klipsch doesn't have an "update" package...can we discuss "updates" by third party vendors to keep Heritage alive?  W/O calling Heresy!!!!!

In looking at houses for sale, or amplifiers, or microphones, etc., "upgrading" is preferable to "updating," because "updating" is sometimes "downgrading."  The old stuff is sometimes better.  The Klipschorn, with almost all of the same components it has had for a long time, reportedly was preferred to the RF7 II and the Palladium by the Hope audience at the gathering.  Heritage, in general, beats many newly designed speakers by a variety of manufacturers.  Of course, I would consider candidates for true upgrades, but I'd like to hear them first, or at least have the designer/vendor have top measuring equipment and an anechoic chamber, perhaps with a revolving door.  Apparently Chris and Roy have encountered some so called "upgrades," or perhaps merely "updates," that weren't all that "up," grade-wise.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, dtel's wife said:

All the time we've spent at Rodney's we have never seen mosquitos. We were there at least ten weeks in total last year. 

 

That's probably because he commercially sprays half the farm to make sure everybody is comfortable.  No telling what that costs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/10/2016 at 9:49 AM, dwilawyer said:

Maybe one way to deal with it is to have someone with technical knowledge (which mine is limited) to be a dedicated moderator of Tech/Mods.  Someone who can call out bullshit.

I spend a lot of time with the Chicago AES chapter where we bring in a bunch of engineering types to talk about their research, passions, whatever...

 

One of the things I've noticed is that there is not consensus about what is / is not BS.

 

It's hard to talk about these things abstractly because these end up being very specific topics. For example, I can show you a ceramic capacitor that causes distortion in one circuit, but does not cause distortion in another. Someone who deals with the other circuit might subscribe to the idea that a cap is a cap and it doesn't matter - therefor snake oil. However, someone that deals with the first circuit where capacitor voltage linearity matters will subscribe to the idea that "better caps" are required....and they'll even have data backing it up...

 

So which ideology do we subscribe to? Do fancy caps make a difference? Some will say yes, some will say no. One of the difficulties with the person saying "no" is that there will always be some finite influence from the non-linear capacitor. The magnitude of this non-linearity can be readily calculated too. However, that little knowledge erodes away at the audiophile pursuit of finding every last drop of performance.

 

The point isn't to get into a debate about capacitors, but to point out how one perspective of a situation results in an ideology that is not true across the board - and now the audio community suffers from those over limited perspectives. In the meantime, it also breaks down what is otherwise a very fun part of the hobby. Questioning ideas and setting up opportunities to listen is something that brings a lot of people together....and results in bringing friends to these sessions as well where they get exposed to some great sounding stuff.

 

I'm actually kinda surprised Klipsch doesn't try to capitalize on the tweaker culture...or personal customization if you want to talk about the younger generations. Making things personal is a HUGE part of the hobby. This idea that there is only one way to do anything comes off very confrontational to the next generation. Why doesn't Klipsch make xovers with multiple slopes and make them easy to swap out? I could just see all the shootouts of people comparing which ones they like and comparing them. There are absolutely subjective tradeoffs when choosing xover slopes and different styles of music might benefit from one versus another....

 

Okay, I've rambled too long.....Klipsch can definitely do whatever they want (and they will). And as much as I'd love to see the real snake oil get ousted entirely, there's a part of me that still wants some of it. It's just part of the magic and if nothing else it affects the emotions of the person doing listening, and if my emotions are different, then I am definitely going to hear things differently. Why is that bias such a bad thing?

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On September 10, 2016 at 10:05 PM, oldtimer said:

When does Michigan play a real team?

 

Probably Oct. 1 when they play the Badgers.  While Michigan is clearly much improved, they had much room for improvement.  The answer to the, "What have you done lately?"question regarding OSU and MSU is, "Not much."  Two victories in the last 20 meetings.   Notice how often the Buckeyes get 42 against the Wolverines.

 

Michigan has one of the best traditions in college football, but bragging about beating high schools is tiresome. 

October 10, 1891   Ann Arbor High School Ann Arbor Fairgrounds  Ann Arbor, MI W 62–0    

 

101

2004

Columbus

Michigan (#7)

21

Ohio State

 

37

 

102

2005

Ann Arbor

Michigan (#17)

21

Ohio State (#9)

 

25

 

103

2006

Columbus

Michigan (#2)

39

Ohio State (#1)

 

42

 

104

2007

Ann Arbor

Michigan (#23)

3

Ohio State (#7)

 

14

 

105

2008

Columbus

Michigan

7

Ohio State (#10)

 

42

 

106

2009

Ann Arbor

Michigan

10

Ohio State (#9)

 

21

 

107

2010[1]

Columbus

Michigan

7

Ohio State (#12)

37

108

2011

Ann Arbor

Michigan (#15)

 

40

 

Ohio State

34

109

2012

Columbus

Michigan (#20)

21

Ohio State (#4)

 

26

 

110

2013

Ann Arbor

Michigan

41

Ohio State (#3)

 

42

 

111

2014

Columbus

Michigan

28

Ohio State (#6)

 

42

 

112

2015

Ann Arbor

Michigan (#12)

13

Ohio State (#8)

 

42

 

113

2016

Columbus

       

 

01

2008

Ann Arbor

Michigan State

 

35–21

102

2009

East Lansing

Michigan State

 

26–20OT

103

2010

Ann Arbor

#17 Michigan State

 

34–17

104

2011

East Lansing

#23 Michigan State

 

28–14

105

2012

Ann Arbor

#23 Michigan

 

12–10

106

2013

East Lansing

#22 Michigan State

 

29–6

107

2014

East Lansing

#8 Michigan State

 

35–11

108

2015

Ann Arbor

#7 Michigan State

 

27–23

109

2016

East Lansing

   
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...